>>84121141
Is it out of hiatus?
>Classic Sonic solo series imminent
>>84121544
That's just a new arc, ding bat.
>>84121544
That's it? That's the cover they've been drip-feeding us for over a week? Lame.
>>84121567
I know, but I am hoping this and the one shots doing well enough...will lead to something long term.
>>84121596
It's a pretty big deal, given that it's for the main book where classic Sonic has been off-limits by corporate mandate for years.
>>84121513
Yeh. Green Lantern Robotnik just came out in the Universe series
>the only thing Sega is doing for Sonic turning a quarter-century old are some comics and more Boom
>the next real game is in 2017
Please...please just kill him already...
>>84121954
I'd rather them release the next not boom game later in 2017. Maybe it'll mean it won't be riddled with bugs. Maybe they'll learn why everyone hates the Boom games and get back to what made the Sonic Adventure games so good. Maybe Chao gardens
>>84122299
Can they just get rid of Boom altogether? Please?
>>84121954
Shut up, Boco.
No really, just stop talking. You're so tiresome.
>>84122348
The games? I wish man I'm with you there.
But the show? Well it's not great but it's totally saved by beef knuckles
