http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/original-batman-films-get-new-official-box-art
The original Batman film franchise is getting a modern makeover, at least where their art is concerned. The digital HD versions of the four original Batman films -- 1989's "Batman," 1992's "Batman Returns," 1995's "Batman Forever" and 1997's "Batman and Robin" -- will soon show off all-new box art, each one featuring head shots of the Caped Crusader and, in some cases, the film's villains. The franchise was steered by two directors: Tim Burton for the first two and Joel Schumacher for the latter pair.
>>84109092
>>84109105
Why does a digital version need box-art?
photoshop is a dead meme
>>84109114
>>84109178
>>84109178
>Batman & Robin
>No color
DC, come on.
>>84109231
It's like they're trying to make the Batman Forever and Batman and Robin box art look more like Snyder's DC films.
>>84109251
Exactly. If it's meant to be a joke, then it's pretty good.
>>84109178
>>84109114
> using desaturated promo pics and stock photos of cities
Wow. Even these turds deserve better than that.
>>84109105
Original was better
>>84109178
>Batman & Robin
You mean Batman & Freeze? Is Freeze supposed to be Robin?
Because that's what the new official boxart is trying to tell me.
>>84109178
>Batman & Robin
>no Robin
Talk about a Dick move.
>>84109092
How is this newsworthy? No, seriously, HOW? Did nothing else really happen today in the comic books sphere?
>>84109610
Imagine them attempting a super serious and desaturated cut of Batman Forever and Batman & Robin.
There's no possible way to do it.
>>84110607
Someone once did a fan cut of Batman Forever with all the deleted scenes. The scenes, IIRC, were a tad bit darker, but nothing that really changes the film all that much.
I think that version began with Two-Face fucking up some orderly at the asylum or something.
>>84109178
>>84109114
>>84109105
>>84109092
>hey guys, what's the cheapest way we can make new covers for the Batman films?
>how about we just take some old promotional photos and photoshop them together?
>brilliant.
The cities in the boxart dont even match the Gotham cities in the movies
My favorite example of this ever was the re-release of Near Dark a few years ago which gave it a very "Twilight-ish" cover.
The idea of teenage girls buying the movie and watching fucking Near Dark thinking it's going to be a tender romance is hilarious.
They all look like shit.
In comparison, here's few covers from the official comic adaptations from 90's.
>>84113931
>>84113931
>>84109092
>2016
>still not looking at those movies as two separate canons
>>84109251
More like trying to make it look like the Nolan films.
>>84113931
>>84113940
These covers are best parts of their respective movies.
Photoshop was a mistake
>>84109092
>>84109105
>>84109114
>>84109178
Wow, these look like a montage project some kid had to make for his highschool graphic design class. These are terrible.
>>84109092
>>84109105
>>84109114
>>84109178
they look like some kid's work for a high school project
>>84109251
>>84114925
>>84115148
A high school project where the kid was asked to do a montage in the style of Zack Snyder's DC films.
>>84110519
>Original was better
Agreed.
>>84109105
Nice
>>84109114
>cuts off just before the Bat-nips
>>84109178
>full-on Bat-nip
>>84109092
Why did they smooth out Nicholson's face like that? And make his eyes fucking massive?
