LOLHere's to 38 years of Garfield.
>>83908861
I make the same face when trying to read something I wrote down, but I'm not old.
>>83908861
God help me I laughed
>>83908861
I smirked.
>You will die in Garfield's lifetime
a Funny garfield strip? Is this the end times!?
I think everyone here has felt that "Holy fuck, did I really do that?" moment.
Also the last panel looks like a reaction image waiting to happen.
>>83908861
This is a weird day. I smiled at a Garfield comic, and I ate walnuts shaped like testicles.
>>83909274
It happens a bit more than you'd think.
>>83909283
Let's put that to the test.
>>83910259
To be fair, it's a Sunday newspaper comic. They intentionally have panels that can be removed, as not all papers run top third of it.
Garfield is pretty bizarre. From launch to late 80's, there was plots and story arcs and character introductions and whatnot. Then from about 1990 or so up until late 2000's, it was the never-funny and repetitive recycling of jokes with nothing happening ever. Then you suddenly have Jon dating Liz and everyone suddenly switched from rotary phones to smartphones. Archiving binging feels weird because of this.
>>83908861
hahahaha that's actually pretty good.
>>83910381
that's not exactly true, most of 90s garfield was good stuff.
>>83910259
God DAMMIT
>>83909508
So Jon actually does understand what Garfield is saying
>>83910343
Also removing the old age comment changes the meaning of the joke.
>>83910259
I hate you.
>>83911062
It varies depending on the joke, I think.
>>83910343
>>83911076I think you're at a loss as to the meaning of this edit.
>>83911135
It doesn't work.
>>83911062
technically nothing about that scene requires garfield to talk, just to put antennae on jon
>>83911062
No. He's just a lonely man who talks to his pets and humors whatever crazy thing his cat is doing.
>>83911270
So he's literally me?
>>83911004
Meh, it was acceptable at best, and bland to the point of boring at worst. Compared to the pre-90's and new-age Garfield, it was pretty bad.
