What if The Rugrats weren't just babies with active imaginations, but were actually manipulating reality?
>>83864844
better than one or more or them being still born
>>83864844
>>83864844
Then it'd just be the baby version of Haruhi.
>>83864844
>what if this kid's show was actually really edgy
Stop that.
>>83865435
what if I fucking KILLED YOU
>>83865487
>>83865501
Dude don't even joke, that scene made me cry.
>>83864844I used to think that to a degree that was the case. I was a stupid kid.
Also, why couldn't Angelica/Suzie translate between the babies and the adults?
This sounds like the concept of a shitty creepypasta written by a fifteen-year-old.
>>83865589
Or a shitty anime written by 30-year-old.
>>83865534
I saw that scene the first day it was in theaters when I was 17. Didn't make me cry.
>>83865501
Holy fuck, why was that scene so sad? All he was doing was pouring food on a baby
Babies fucking do that on their own
>>83865666
>>83865666
>666
>why was that scene so sad?
It wasn't you are just weak and going to hell for being so.
>>83865559
I think they could if they wanted to, but Angelica wouldn't want to.
And the parents wouldn't necessarily believe them if they did that anyway.
>>83865666
He was pouring food on a baby so that he would get mauled and devoured by monkeys.
The fact he was about to do something THAT malicious, and realizes it right before doing it, that's what makes it sad.
>>83865559
would you believe a four year old claiming to translate for babies?
>>83865559
How could they even understand them? At what point in your life are you not able to understand babytalk anymore? There were kids older than Angelica and Suzy who could understand the babies.
>>83866906
Along with your question why can't Dil speak in baby gibberish - i mean understandable baby language.
>>83865435
>really edgy
Manipulating reality doesnt really fall under that word, even this site's warped definition of it
>>83864844
But that's just a theory
