PIXAR'S DONE IT AGAIN
Do they find Dory?
>>83828063
No, she gets shoved down a garbage disposal.
>>83828036
>taking the word and mouth of one site
>assuming earlier reviewers can't be paid to write reviews
They can't rate it badly because the MC is a cute retard.
Dory was the worst part of the first movie.
>>83828427
People say that every single fucking time. No, you can't buy 73 fucking reviews.
>>83828697
Dory was great in the first movie.
>>83828697
She's missing in this one, so i guess that's why it's good
>>83828427
That's not one site. It's an aggregate of 73 (as of that pic) sites.
Oh, wait, you believe in the paid reviews conspiracy. Nevermind, you're just retarded.
>>83828036
Can someone spoil me the ending?
>>83828697
>Dory
thats a funny way of spelling Crush anon
>>83829090
brah ya totally need to check out this strain of kelp
>>83828427
>word and mouth
mistakes like these are a diamond dozen now that it's summer on /co/
>>83828036
Saw it on wednesday.
It's basically about disability and how people with disabilities are treated.
Quality-wise, it's good. It's not amazing. It's Finding Nemo 2: Dory Edition
Just saw it too last night
pretty damn good movie, a little tad too familiar in the beginning but it was really starting pickup as long as they reached the marine institute. And that what makes the movie felt fresher than the predecessor. The new characters were great, especially Hank The Octopus. But somehow, I felt it lacked of little charm of Pixar's best.
I put it right in the middle compare to other Pixar films, definitely not their best but it was really good.I still found Zootopia better overall
>>83828036
More like the jews doe it again. how the hell did they manage to outscore the first movie?
This shit is literally a half assed cash in to the original
>>83828036
Remember guys, with RT you have to apply the Pixar Bias Scale, where each point is actually worth five.
100% = 95%
99 = 90
98 = 85
97 = 80
96 = 75
95 = 70%
This is a solid C movie.
>>83828427
Are you an idiot son?
>>83829875
>This shit is literally a half assed cash in to the original
I haven't seen it but it could just, you know, be good
>>83829147
I forerun agree with you
>>83830002
>using RT score as a measure of quality rather than a likelihood of you enjoying it
>>83830002
Yet another retard who doesn't understand how Pixar works.
>>83830158
What? What does the Pixar Bias Scale have to do with how Pixar works?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSJ4RK7dzm8
>>83828427
>Something I don't like was well received
>They must have been paid off
>All +50 of them
>>83828427
>word and mouth
Go back to growing weed Ricky
>>83828036
>tfw the next film won't be out for another full year and it's cars 3
>>83828036
>It took the lifespan of zootopia to get 4 bad reviews
>Finding Dory has just come out
Nah, but I'm sure it will be a fine movie
>Pixar
>Disney
>implying the critics aren't getting paid
>>83828427
Disney can't buy people's opinions.
>>83830002
>wahh pixar bias
kill yourself.
>>83830002
>Pixar Bias
Tell that to Cars, Cars 2 and Brave.
>>83828427
>assuming earlier reviewers can't be paid to write reviews
You do realize they do get paid to write reviews. It's their job.
assume these reviews are 100% true
>Disney succeeds with frozen
>Disney succeeds with Zootopia
>this
>Animated movie with The Rock electrifies all.
>Dreamfinder and Figment come back and make Journey into imagination great again.
>???
>Disney master plan works.
>I can experience the fact that Disney is great again.
So that's my theory of what happens next for Disney.
>>83828036
who else expecting this movie to make a billion dollars
>>83829875
>This shit is literally a half assed cash in to the original
actual jew here.
I don't know how they (or in this case "we") do it. But I do have ideas.
They built up SUCH good vibes when their movies were more original, and less predictably sentimental all in exactly the same way, that people convince themselves they're seeing the same spontaneity again.
They're not.
They lost me at Up, when the start convincingly made me emotional but then it was jammed together with a movie full of talking dogs. I felt like the grab for my emotions was fake.
And that's how it's been with every Pixar since.
>>83828427
>>83829090
That's a funny way of spelling Bruce.
>>83831309
>tfw Kubo comes out in two months
>>83833233
Hope it's good after the mess that was Box Trolls
I WANT to like you, Laika
>>83830362
>Something I don't like was well received, They must have been paid off
>Something that I like got top score, is a completely legit score and they are professional reviewers.
All the fucking time.
>>83831639
>implying pixar has a perfect track record
>>83828036
I was actually expecting this to be a let-down. GG Pixar, see you at the Oscars,again...
>>83830266
Dammit, Onion. This actually made me sad.
>>83831639
I doubt they're getting paid and are just incredibly biased towards Disney and Pixar
>>83832769
Make Disney Great Again
When it comes to Pixar, don't bother trying to argue with /co/. They'll defend any of their shitty films to the death of them, unless it's Cars. Same applies to any Disney film.
>>83828036
Really hoping this movie is an actual good Pixar film. Inside Out was good at first, but after re watching it falls apart.
They haven't made anything amazing since Ratatouille.
>>83833233
Please don't fuck that up like you did with Box Trolls Lakia, I beg you.
>>83833037
That pic is funny because Warner owns both DC and Rotten Tomatoes.
Found a new trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9n-9bFkkkI
>>83832034
Brave has a 78%, dude. It should have a 28%.
>>83833275
You can already tell just from the trailers it will be at least better than that. Whether or not it's as good as ParaNorman remains to be seen.
>>83828036
Ever since it got announced, I've been trying to call the plot:
Does she find her family, not to be remembered, and decide Martin and Nemo + company were her family all along?
>>83833918
Wouldn't it be neat if film critics could review movies without knowing who made them? Like those blind taste tests where the tasters end up rating expensive brand food that they think they like better more poorly than cheaper ones they would normally not buy. If Brave could somehow be put to that test I think a lot of people would mistake it for a different studio.
>>83834142
They will definitely make a point that Marlin and Nemo are her "real" family at some point, no matter what else happens. It very well could be the lesson at the end or a climax near the end, but they also could get it out of the way and brush it off quickly at the very beginning with a line like "I know you guys are my family now, but I still want to find my mom and dad. Will you help me?"
does it have a depressing ending?
>>83833656
Make Imagination Great Again.
>>83831569
>It took the lifespan of zootopia to get 4 bad reviews
>lifespan
You furfags are really fucking stupid.
>>83834692
Jeremy Jahns said it has three endingsBut the real ending is sort of abrupt.
Are critics nowadays blinded by anything Disney produces? Their movies are fine and all but nothing really extraordinary.
>>83834948
Do we have to wait til the DVD comes out to get the other endings?
Now I'm wondering if I should see it right away in case there's a bad audience reaction and they swap endings. Is that possible here?
>>83835094
He meant it was like RotK when you thought it was going to wrap up but kept going for another few minutes..
>>83835184
Ah, I see.
>>83828762
>conspiracy
I bet you thought frozen was good
>>83833284
>someone makes a post
>someone else shitposts
>gets a (you)
All the fucking time.
>>83829218
Literally just got back.
It's basically this. There's no need for it to exist, but it doesn't offend anyone by existing. See it on a matinee.
>>83829218
>about disability and how people with disabilities are treated
Hm. That actually makes it sound like an interesting concept.
>>83832034
I'll give you Cars 2, but Cars and Brave are both in the 70's.
If they were made by a studio like DreamWorks they'd be lucky to make it to 60%.
>>83830202
Pixar formula:
1.) make generic animated film
2.) at one or two scenes loaded with emotional manipulation
3.) put that logo with the lamp out in front of the film
3.) sit back and watch as critics hail it as a masterpiece and you win Oscar after Oscar over superior competition because 'muh Pixar feels' trump all
>>83834990
Yes.
Doesn't hurt that Ellen Degeneres is the main character, and everyone seems to suck up to her.
Add the Pixar bias reviewers have, the speculation that there are gay characters and voila! You've got a critically acclaimed film that'll undeservedly win the Oscar over Zootopia!
P.S. That "The Force Awakens" has a 92% on RT should be enough to invalidate the majority of modern film critics
>>83829218
Katawa Sakana when?
>>83828427
>implying Disney can't hire 70 "professional reviewers" to pad their reviews/make other films look bad.
Marvelshill still made BvS was better than Civil Bore
>>83837198
Zack please leave
>>83837198
Why are you shitposting about BvS in a Pixar thread
>>83837220
>>83837265
>SAVE ME REDDIT
Marvel BTFO
>>83836931
>make a good film that people like
>Receive praise and money as a result
Funny how that works, huh?
>>83837198
Honestly it wouldn't surprise me if this were the case.
I mean, we're talking about fucking Disney here. They literally ARE the film industry, and have been for the past few years.
Of course there is the occasional flop, but it always seems like the films they make that aren't critically loved are ones that are not vital -- i.e. non-franchise films or original films (Alice in Wonderland is only two films and Tomorrowland wasn't a franchise yet so its failure was confined to one film).
Then again there's always the chance that critics are just blinded by nostalgia and their childhood, and can't bear giving a movie surrounding one of the cartoon characters they grew up with being bad. Also the cult-like nature of Ellen's fans and people towards her makes me contemplate the existence of the illuminati, much like Beyonce's success does.
>>83837296
Film critics nit-pick movies for a living..except when it comes to Disney films it seems. Those they handle with kid gloves and judge on the basis of "fun".
Also it's one thing to say a film is good, it is another to go all in an throw praise like 'best animated film of all time' around like they do with the majority of Pixar films which, let's face it, are for the most part vastly overrated.
>>83828427
Just got back from an early showing a few hours ago and I must say, it's surprisingly good for a sequel, considering how godlessly awful sequels usually are.
Solid 7.5/10
>>83828885Charlie and Jenny are okay
>>83829374
He's a fuckin septapus anon
I can't wait to see it, I love water and fish and ocean life and I loved finding nemo because of that. Like looking at aquariums for 2 hours
SPOIL THE FUCKING ENDING
>>83828036
How many Blue Tangs are going to die this year because retarded parents put them in goldfish bowls full of tapwater like the clownfish of old?
>>83828036
not sure why you care, it changes nothing between us and animation inustry
For people who have seen the film, I just want to know:
Are those chicks in the trailer actually confirmed for lesbians or was tumblr just pulling that out of their asses?
>>83838081
go to any bookstore. the whole story is in children's books.
>>83838122
Who the fuck cares? They're fish.
>>83838122
It was kind of nice seeing this in the petstore last week.
>>83836931
Matt Singer
ScreenCrush:
>After 21 years, the Pixar formula is still very satisfying. But it also feels more like a formula than ever before.
sure i kinda cherrypicked this one, but it confirms modern movies aren't made anymore, they're produced.
>>83838318
Name a good movie that was "made" in the last five years.
I'll wait.
>>83838318
I bet he still caved and gave it a good review though.
And yes, while I realize movies have always been "produced" at least older films gave the impression that there was an actual artist behind the camera. I know it isn't all Disney's fault, but I feel like they've only made this issue worse in the past couple years and have accelerated it to the point where it is very difficult to defend films (at least mainstream films) as an art-form.
Give me studio filmmakers like George Stevens, William Wyler, Fred Zinneman, and Billy Wilder over 99% of modern "filmmakers."
>>83838382
There are definitely good movies still being made, but they pale in comparison to older films.
Honestly I get 10 times more satisfaction watching stuff on TCM than I would going to the theaters to see whatever shlock is being produced these days.
>>83838422
Older Movies > "Produced" Movies > "Made" Movies
I'll take mediocre shit over genuinely terrible shit. We're lucky anyone is even making movies anymore instead of just killing themselves anyway. Movies almost don't belong in today's climate.
>>83828036
Who should I blame for these shitty fucking RT bait threads? /tv/?
>>83838396
>Give me studio filmmakers like George Stevens, William Wyler, Fred Zinneman, and Billy Wilder over 99% of modern "filmmakers."
My brother! Classical film-making=best film-making
>>83838396
>>83838755
Eventually you'll get bored and join the rest of the world as it produces new content.
>>83828427
>word and mouth
>one site
First of all, it's "word of mouth" and second of all, it's a collection of reviews from a bunch of other sites.
I don't think someone can be this stupid so I'll just assume you're baiting.
>>83838781
I'm not saying I won't, but it doesn't kill to have some artistic standards, even for mass-produced entertainment
>>83838396
Pixar has been pushing the boundaries of what can be done in children's animated films (Ratatouille, Up, Inside Out), while Walt Disney Animation Studios has been mostly tapping into 90s nostalgia (The Princess and the Frog, Tangled, Frozen).
None of this is even remotely as cancerous as Marvel movies and live-action remakes of Disney's classic animated films.
>>83838849
Even gods sometimes falter.
>>83838849
And you know for a fact Moana is going to be at least between 80%-90%, regardless of quality (case in point -- Frozen... except with the use of a brown princess it'll be even more critic proof).
I just don't fucking get it. It's like critics are trying to help Disney smother all competition until they are the only big studio left in Hollywood.
>>83839097
I still can't believe the first one made over $1 billion, the movie was shit
>>83838382
A few of my favorites of the last few years include Her, Upstream Color, Birdman and Kumiko the Treasure Hunter.
Of course, your millage may vary, everyone is welcome to their own opinion. But writing off all modern movies is like writing off all modern music. There was just as much shitty music back in the 70s or 80s as there is now. Just all the really shitty songs have been forgotten with time. Same applies to film.
What you've done is akin to eating a snickers bar and asking why no one cooks good food anymore.
>>83838318
If you're looking for films less over produced, maybe don't gravitate towards the ones with hundreds of millions poured into their budget? It's basic risk assessment; the studios want to feel they've gotten their moneys worth, so the directors have to bend to their specific desires.
>>83838382
Zootopia.
>>83839439
I think you underestimate how big Alice in Wonderland is with prototumblrite, DA fangirls.
I dunno, maybe don't make a sequel to a movie like Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland like 7 years after the first one.
Also, you might want to wait until your Star's, admittedly pretty flimsy, accusations of Domestic Abuse blow over before releasing it
>>83830266
This is hilarious but also so true and incredibly sad I'm tearing up.
>>83838382
out of /co/?
Rango (2011)
>>83839439
>American McGee's Alice was more Burton than Burton's actual Alice
I find this extremely amusing.
>>83839590
That movie was a mess during the production, director wanted it to be entirely about the protagonist, who constantly was shatted on by the world, and you were supposed to root for him, instead it just made the audience hate the world around him, fortunately Disney figured it and the crew asked Pixar for advice, it was a rare case where everything went right despite and thanks to the production problems.
>>83840098
What are you talking about
>>83839097
I don't know why they even decided to go with an Alice motif for this movie. It felt nothing like Alice. It felt more like a Pirates of the Caribbean movie.
>>83833895
if this is the average korean movie then no wonder their suicide rate is so high
>>83840091
>We will never get American McGee's Oz
This really rusts my jimmies
>>83829374
it was less enjoyable than the nemo, but overall the pacing wasnt too bad. Seemed shorter than it actually was.
>>83840461
>yugioh can get an Oz archetype but Alice never will
This just makes me sad
>>83828427
what source of reviews do you consider reliable?
>>83838154
I don't even know what characters your talking about, so probably not lesbians.
>>83841271
I doubt they're actually characters.
>>83840146
I coild give you brief summary, but it'll be faster to direct you to "imagining zootopia" in YouTube, almost everything is explained there.
>>83841468
i've seen backlash and complaints at this because they're only in the movie for a quick bit
>>83841468
Those two are on screen for about 5 seconds. If there's anything to indicate that they're a couple, it's quick and subtle enough that I never noticed.
>>83841529
That's pretty dumb. There was nothing in the trailer to indicate that they'd be on screen much longer than the few seconds they were in the trailer. They're pretty clearly just pieces of a small scene and the only reason they've gotten any attention at all is because of meme power.
>>83830266
this hit home hard
javascript:quote('83828036
This movie will do fine, it will sell overpriced plastic trinkets and some snacks, it's made to promote merchandise.
Just like Minions and recently, Angry Birds
>>83841468
you wouldnt be able to tell its not a dude anyway
like real lesbians
>>83833233
>>83833275
Same here. I hope it's at least close to how good Paranorman was
>>83828427
>DIsney paid 73 individual outlets to write reviews and not one of them decided to break a lucrative story about said payment
>>83838154
No, it's just tumblr. Ellen said herself she doesn't know and it never actually thought of it. The creators on the hand neither denied it or admitted to it, probably just didn't want to anger the fans and prevent people from boycotting the film. So no, I don't believe it was a lesbian couple. You can't just assume they are just because two females are walking together.
>>83828036
LOOK AT ALL THE CRITICS WE BOUGHT
>>83832938
Thank you Schlomo for using actual logic unlike these goyim.
>>83836085
Not really. If this was the 19th century and they Dickens, then it would be a neat concept. As it is now, people with disabilities are treated with respect and are offered the help they need. At least where I live. Dont have a clue what its like in Hollywood.
>>83839204
Which will only help the opposition when they make a better movie that grosses 2bil because it defied the Disney/Pixar formula.
>>83838849
>m-muh paid critics
>tfw I actually loved all of them and glad they got a great score
>>83833186
I think we can all agree on this.
>>83831309
at least Coco comes out right afteer
>it's about people with disability
So just like Finding Nemo then, or have ya'll forgot Nemo had one fin shorter than the other?
>people watching pixar
>>83828036
>Disney paid the Positve Score Fee
What a surprise.
>>83844115
>people using 4chan
>>83840146
He's right, it was a clusterfuck up until nearly the end, but I wasn't aware they asked Pixar for advice. But even most of the deleted scenes, for example, involve content relating to the previous concept (notably the shock collars).
>>83834294
On the flip side of that, it's weird how many people mistake Disney's 3D animated films for Pixar films. My friend thought Pixar made Zootopia and Wreck-It Ralph, and he didn't realize Pixar made Cars....He's not much of a /co/mrade, to be fair. But /co/mrades aren't really a good litmus anyway.
I think a lot of people just lump things into either "kind of feelsy, has a lot of heart = Pixar" or "crass pop culture bullshit = DreamWorks", since that was the trend for years, even if it's no longer true.
>Disney paying anything
>implying they just didn't memed the opinion that "Pixar=Good", ensuring that no matter how mediocre, unnecessary, or unoriginal one of their flicks are, braindead bandwagoners who want to fit in with the crowd will write it off as good.
>>83845158
>even if it's no longer true.
>last year pixar did Inside zout while DW did Home
>>83845243
Didn't work for Dinosaur Homeward Bound.
>>83844254
Hmm I wonder who could be behind this post...
>>83830266
I didn't come here to feel.
>>83835976
>but it doesn't offend anyone by existing.
Yeah it does. It totally does.
>people believe the Disney buying critics meme after Alice 2 was a critical and financial flop
>>83845384
>this year DW is doing Ice Age Collision Course and literally none of the jokes in the trailers thus far are funny
It's like watching nu-Simpsons.
>>83839540
>Birdman
Opinion discarded.
>>83839706
>admittedly pretty flimsy
She has witnesses, video, she called the police, she showed up to court with bruises.
What the fuck more do you want?
>>83845011
Makes me wonder why they bothered put so much collar related stuff on bluray.This something to be ashamed of, not proud.
The moment it was brought up it should be entirely scrapped, that collar is basically a taser triggered by adrealine: be upset over petty thing -shock, someone run over fox's tail - shock, kid is over excited over birthday gift - shock, fox trying
to defend himself from bloodthirsty panther -shock.try to burst in tears -shock. Almost all of these scenes were going to be in the movie.
This item should never be brought up to the table and eight writers tried to make a movie around it,amazing in a bad away.
I reluctantly look at the future of zootopia's franchise, perhaps this was the reason Disney tries to forget about this movie asap.
>>83845384
So are you saying it's still the trend, then? With things like Brave, Cars, and The Good Dinosaur?
I'm not saying Pixar can't make emotional films any more, nor am I saying DreamWorks can't make shallow stinkers, but these days the automatic "Pixar = quality feels" assumption is unwarranted.
>>83845543
Come now, anon, I doubt it's a source of pride. They just thought people would find it interesting, and people did. Do you think creators are proud of the sketchy, half-formed crap that ends up in artbooks, too?
>>83828036
As someone who enjoyed the first film, convince me to see this one.
>>83845508
You're talking about Dreamworks, right? They don't do Ice Age. There aren't enough dirty jokes in those films to be by Dreamworks.
>>83845585
>Brave, Cars, and The Good Dinosaur?
Ironically enough all those films were better recieved than Home, The Croods and Peabody and Sherman
>>83845585
>Putting The Good Dinosaur together with Brave and Cars
Come on man. The Good Dinosaur might not have been a top-tier Pixar movie, but it's a lot better than those two shits. I thought it was pretty good.
>>83845721
I enjoyed Cars a lot more than that shitty uninteresting tech demo dinosaur movie.
>>83845585
Every drawing in the "art of zootopia" artbook is top notch, it was and is my personal opinion though, feel free to disagree.
I also am pretty sure they could put something better on the disks, perhaps in the future they will, Disney is known for frequent re-releases of their works with some minor bonus content.
>>83845721
I haven't even seen The Good Dinosaur. I'm just going by what people have said.
>>83845782
I'm talking about art books in general. There's lots of shit in broader supplementary material, including bonus disc content (for any cartoon), that got axed for reasons other than time. Early drafts of characters in wildly different forms, terrible story concepts and clashing colour palettes... This is like the meat and potatoes of behind-the-scenes stuff. It's a documentary, not bragging rights.
>>83845721
I don't know. TGD felt really really short. After watching it I thought the film was 45 minutes long when it was actually twice that long. Hardly anything happened in it. At least Cars felt like a solid film.
>>83845598
if you like Dory, you're gonna love this one
>>83832938
>They lost me at Up, when the start convincingly made me emotional but then it was jammed together with a movie full of talking dogs. I felt like the grab for my emotions was fake.
I stopped watching Pixar after Toy Story 3, when I stopped seeing it as "tugs at your heartstrings" and more like "openly and without subtlety grabs and yanks at the heartstrings until it's not amusing any more."
>>83845887
Lassetter(?) said animal equivalent of sewing on a yellow star on a jewish kid was a great scene, but what do I know. I'm merely part of audience with my preferences and dislikes.
>>83845585
>Brave, Cars, and The Good Dinosaur
Considering critical consensus is that all those films are better than Dreamworks current output? Yes. Brave and GD aren't even bad films so I'm not sure why you're stacking them up together.
>but these days the automatic "Pixar = quality feels" assumption is unwarranted.
No that's just you being a contrarian. Quite ironic that when it comes to Zootopia another Disney flick the RT score matters but when Finding Dory gets universal praise the critics are getting paid off. /co/ was just so ready to shit on this film before it was released and to see it once again blow up in their faces is a site to behold.
>People trying to defend DW as if they've made anything good in the past 5 years that wasn't KFP or HTTYD
You remember that they're next movie is that fucking Trolls shit right?
>That crab couple near the end
:3
>>83846223
Are they really "crab fab"?
>>83828036
Why would I want to watch a disabled thing flounder about for an hour. Seems cringey.
>>83845910
I really didn't. Does the new movie at least have the same amazing atmosphere?
>>83833833
Boxtrolls was actually pretty good. At least the parts with the Henchmen were.
>>83846327
>Boxtrolls was actually pretty good.
No
>>83846219
KFP and HTTYD are their only great films. They have a couple of good/okay ones like the first two Shrek, Puss in Boots, The Croods, Megamind, RotG and maybe a few others but the rest are shit, only made to make extra money inbetween stuff like KFP and HTTYD.
>>83846187
There is a continuum between bad and good, anon. It isn't all one or the other, and just because something isn't a bad movie doesn't make it some kind of slam dunk. It could just be middle-of-the-road mush. Stop trying to make this into a company wars thing when that was never the intent. I was only speculating on why people assume that films like Wreck-It Ralph and Big Hero 6 are from Pixar: first impressions are everything.
For the record, I'm not particularly upset if Finding Dory is well received. I want to see good movies, and if Finding Dory is a good movie, that's great.
>>83846348
>>83833833
>>83833275
Fuck you guys. I loved Boxtrolls.
>>83846187
I was wary of Dory because Pixar sequels haven't had a good track record considering the last bunch so I was quite sure this was just another cash-in and I doubt I'm alone. If the movie is good, that's great.
Also, people in general are predisposed to disliking the idea of Pixar sequels in general besides Toy Story because they used to say they would never do them. Compare that to Zootopia which is a new Disney IP and came out in the wake of Frozen, despite being much better than Frozen, obviously it would get more people wanting it to succeed
>>83843752
>implying the general public doesn't lap up the Disney formula and fear anything that deviates from it
That's why you had people complaining thatStoick's deathin How to Train Your Dragon 2 was "too dark" while seemingly being fine about what Big Hero 6 did.
>>83835626
>Don't Like a Thing
>Must Mean Everyone Else Don't Like A Thing
>>83846463
>I was wary of Dory because Pixar sequels haven't had a good track record
Jesus Christ, this only applies to Cars 2 and Cars wasn't a good movie to begin with. Monsters University was good just wasn't really necessary much like Toy Story 3 and the upcoming 4. Nobody wouldn't shut up about wanting an Incredibles 2 for the longest of time either.
>>83846463
zootopia did great! Except the fact... No one cares.
Honestly at this point, as long as it doesn't win the Oscar over Zootopia, I don't give a fuck.
Still won't see it.
>>83846626
>Except the fact... No one cares.
Except the furfags who keep making threads
>>83846638
>Honestly at this point, as long as it doesn't win the Oscar over Zootopia, I don't give a fuck.
I really hope it does just to spite you. How fucking petty do you have to be over the fucking Oscars of all things.
So how long before Disney smothers out all its competition and they are the only major Hollywood studio in town?
I only ask because I wonder if the Best Picture nominees will include Infinity Wars and Frozen 7: Elsa is a Lesbian.
>>83846675
I'm just sick and tired of the fucking Pixar circle-jerk.
>>83846713
>I'm sick and tired of a Pixar circle jerk
>I want a Disney circlejerk
>Yet another fucking animal movie weakening chances of Kubo's award for best animated feature.
>>83846766
Honestly I want neither, but this year at least Zootopia is an original property.
If the voters are such retards they're gonna vote Disney regardless, the very least they could do is pick a Disney film that is original and deserving.
>>83846805
>Zootopia
>original and deserving
Furfag pls
>>83846797
Assuming it's actually good
>>83846713
Their praise is warranted. Grow up.
I'm this anon >>83846638
While I do want Zootopia to win, I agree that the attention and awards that Disney/Pixar films get is obnoxious as all hell.
It's a shame too since this is the year Disney would be at least a somewhat deserving winner, while they should have lost in 2013 and 2014 and Pixar should have lost in 2012.
So unfortunately with three Disney-produced films in the mix Kubo unfortunately has no chance. It'll get lucky to get nominated regardless of how good it actually is.
Case in point: Big Hero 6 beat Lego Movie (not nominated), How to Train Your Dragon 2, Song of the Sea, and the fucking Tale of the fucking Princess Kaguya.
If Kaguya and SoTS can't win over animated capeshit despite being arguably two of the best animated films of the decade, what chance does Kubo have?
>>83846797
The music was apt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5TmIuUb9SA
>>83846824
Nah man, their films are overrated as hell.
It's one thing to say many of their movies are good, which they are, but the way people salivate over them is annoying -- especially when there are other animated films out there that run circles around them and never get half of the attention they do.
>>83846675
>How fucking petty do you have to be over the fucking Oscars of all things.
Oh yeah, because /co/ totally wasn't annoyed when Brave won the Oscar over WiR and Paranorman
Wait, how can this be really good but Cars 2 be shit and Monsters University being mediocre?
Doesn't make any sense.
Finding Dory seems like it's pretty good. It sounds like it's not quite as good as the first but still hilarious and heartwarming nonetheless. I don't know why /co/ is pissed at Disney and Pixar, since them and Laika seem to be the only ones giving us good theatrical shit nowadays. I get you it that you hate the circlejerk but come on. We're finally getting a decent animated movie in the US since Zootopia and everyone's complaining.
>>83846872
>because /co/ totally wasn't annoyed when Brave won the Oscar over WiR and Paranorman
Pretty sure only WiR fags complained.
>>83846675
I was pretty happy when Force Awakens didn't win anything it was nominated for. Now that was overrated.
>>83846888
Because it's a Pixar film that stars everyone's favorite lesbian Ellen Degeneres.
Plus the majority of these critics probably grew up with the characters, so it is hard for them to give a negative review to something with Dory's face on it.
>>83846890
>$20 Mickey Mouse Bucks was just deposited into your bank account
>>83846871
Like? Don't fucking say HTTYD.
>>83846888
Different directors
>>83846947
I honestly can't believe it got a nomination for Film Editing.
Literally how???
>>83846960
Worse, Zootopia
>>83846967
Nostalgia factor, what else.
Like how John Williams got nominated despite making the most forgettable score in the series.
>>83846960
>hating HTTYD
Go fuck yourself.
Also let's see, just off the top of my head:
- Rango (which won the Oscar, but only because now Disney film was nominated)
- Song of the Sea
- The Wind Rises
- The Tale of the Princess Kaguya
- Kung Fu Panda 2
- Wreck-it-Ralph
- 5 Centimeters Per Second
>>83847046
>5 Centimeters Per Second
Not even Shinkai's best let alone the best animation has to offer
Didn't one of the Best Animated Film judges admit they don't bother watching the nominees and just vote for what their kids watched?
>>83847104
Still liked it more than the majority of Pixar films.
>>83847127
One of them alluded to Song of the Sea and The Tale of the Princess Kaguya as "obscure freaking chinese fuckin' things".
>>83847127
Yes because the most prominent members of the Academy are grumpy 60 year old men
Don't worry give it 10 years or so and they will all be dead and it might finally get some real consideration going into the nominees
>>83847046
Japanese films shouldn't be included in 5his discussion.
Wreck-It-Ralph? How can any movie with a Rihanna segment beat Pixar's best? Laughable.
Kung-Fu Panda was DW's best 3D film and is still outclassed by many Pixar films.
Rango was good, but come on man. Better than The Incredibles? Toy Stories? Ratatouille? WALL-E?
Nope.
>>83838382
It Follows
>>83847046
I don't hate HTTYD but the circlejerk around it is far, far more irrational than Pixar, considering how mediocre the sequel was.
>>83847270
>far more irrational than Pixar
Funny you say that, but for me it is the opposite. The circle jerk surrounding Pixar films baffles me. It's one thing to enjoy them, but to act as if they're somehow these indisputable masterpieces feels like everyone jumping on the bandwagon.
>>83838382
Are you really so ignorant that you think Hollywood sequels and capes are literally the only films out there
>>83847327
Not him, but with the sheer amount of press capeshit and sequels get you'd think that's all there was.
>>83847303
Pixar set the Gold Standard for 3D animated movies, changed the animated movie industry. Their best works trump any other studio, and it's not close.
>>83847380
>best works trump any other studio, and it's not close
Your opinion.
To me, the best Disney films (Lion King, etc.) and especially the best Ghibli films trump Pixar.
>>83828427
> DC couldnt pay the BvS reviewers enough money to sell their conscious
>>83847439
>best Disney films
>The Lion King
boy I'm boutta do it
>The Piper short
Their animation shits all over everybody else. It was also cute :3
It was decent, the emotional manipulation felt super fucking obvious though, with the flashback scenes especially. Made me realize in the end we really didn't need a sequel to Finding Nemo.
>>83828036
>implying it's not going to be another Toy Story 3 situation
>implying Finding Dory isn't literally just going to be Finding Nemo, but with Dory instead of Nemo, and no other differences
this exact thing happened with Toy Story 3 and it was god awful garbage.
>>83847692
When in a Pixar film is it not obvious?
>>83847694
This.
Pixar can make a sequel that rehashes a fuckton of elements from a previous entry in the canon, but thanks to a few emotionally manipulative scenes and the Pixar brandname critics are able to overlook it and call it a masterpiece.
Also, daily reminder that Toy Story 4 is real and happening -- and all of the closure you felt with the third film is about to go bye-bye in the name of money.
>>83847747
Early on they had a better balance. Brad Bird's films don't tend to hinge on emotional manipulation and are probably the least pretentious of the bunch.
The worst offenders are Toy Story 3 and the films directed by Pete Docter.
>>83847747
At least with most of their other movies it's to a lesser degree and helps tell the story to an extent but here it just felt mostly unnecessary.
>>83838382
Song of the Sea
>>83846797
That movie never stood a chance. Animated Feature award is always won by a children's movie because judges rarely watch all the nominations and usually go for the popular choice or the one their kids liked the most, and that means Disney.
This year's is guaranteed to be Zootopia, Finding Dory or Moana.
>>83849133
Loving Vincent stands a chance, it doesn't even have any animators in production! this means the academy's raging hateboner for animators is quelled. Also it's le moody oscarbait
>>83843649
Depends on the disability. I see alzheimers patients getting treated like shit all the time. Physical disabilities are often treated reasonably well but mental ones still get shit on all the time.
>>83845158
I'm still adjusting to the fact Disney exclusively makes 3D movies now considering that was once a big part of what they owned Pixar for.
>>83847204
Great post anon. Keep up the good work.
>>83846818
But it is original and deserving.
Finding Nemo was never good. People just like to look at fish and other pretty ocean shit.
>>83830266
Jesus.
>>83847694
>>83847810
>Toy Story 3
>god awful garbage
Sup /co/ntrarian
http://deadline.com/2016/06/finding-dory-box-office-central-intelligence-captain-america-totals-1201774498/
Furfags blown the fuck out
Saw it yesterday.
I dunno, felt really flat and boring.
Things just kept happening and resolving so quickly that I thought the movie would be over in 30 minutes.
Also Nemo was suuuuuuch a bitch holy crap get over yourself.
Overall it was like a 6/10, definitely overrated but not offensively bad or anything.
>>83828036
>DISNEY PAYS IT RENT AGAIN
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>83851156
Thank you for your irrelevant opinion
>>83850179
Okay mate
https://youtu.be/peM4idXEyM8
>>83833656
Build a wall to keep tumblr out
>>83847046
Don't forget the LEGO movie not even getting nominated.
I thought this movie was great. When it started playing what a wonderful world, I lost my shit. I give it a solid B+ the beginning of the movie was slow, but it picked up at the aquarium. Also, the octopus and whale shark are goat
>>83833233
I went on a date to see finding dory, and the trailer showed before the film. After we were discussing how the shitty most of the trailers were. And she said "yeah, like that weird Japanese movie with the monkey"
I'm deleting that cunt from my life 100%
>>83838154
No just tumblr, I didn't even fucking notice. And to be honest I just assumed they were two moms taking their kids to the aquarium
Anyone else's favorite pixar filmwall-e?
>>83830002
How the fuck do people still not realize how RT works yet? 95% doesn't mean that the movie is 95 out of 100, it means that 95% of critics gave it a score higher than 6/10. If you want to gauge a movie from RT check out that tiny number underneath the big one called AVERAGE RATING.
>>83846947
Mad Max wasn't that great either, but it still was probably the best last year. Ex Machina deserved a couple of those Oscars, I think.
>>83847038
The score was fine, JJ Abrams just didn't believe in it enough to put it in the memorable scenes and chose to put the well known themes everywhere instead.
Must be a TV thing, because the Russos did the same thing, where they put the music too low for it to be part of the movie foreground, and it ends up seeming forgetable because you can't hear it over the metal clanks.
>>83846967
The revenant was nominated for Sound Editing AND Mixing and every indian had a 1 second delay between mouth movement and sound.
