American translation or British translation?
>>83592791
British English is better any time.
>>83592791
Why is the art different?
>>83592898
Which one is the UK/US one?
>>83592898
because Americans cant handle little girl nipples and other cultures
>>83592876
Wots thaht govna? Nother pot of tea?
Let's compare, shall we?
US left / UK right
>>83593281
Does the UK version really have that? And if so does her mom go topless?
>>83593472
>Have you still got a crush over the boy opposite
What a clunky fucking sentence. Its trash.
>>83593524
5 pages; verdict, GO!
>>83593554
UK all the way!
>>83593533
- Marcelle, I dare you to use ze most awkward possible phrasing in zis balloon!
-Challenge accepted, mon pote!
>>83593554
The American version reads better in most instances.
Book 2! Hope I'm not spoiling anything.
>>83595530
There.
>>83593554
Where are the nipples? I was told that there would be nipples!
>>83593477
>And if so does her mom go topless?
This is the important question.
French.
>>83595552
Sweet jesus UK version, who the fuck approved of that font!?
>>83593472
I can't auctualy decide they both have about the same number of superior lines
My first impression was in favour of the left though the first 3 panels of the right were trash
>>83595763
>>83595911
Next volume?
>>83596102
Wait so they redrew an entire fucking comic to get rid of some nipples on 2 panels
I get they did it all instead of just the one panel to maintain a consistent artstyle instead of having one panel in a difrent style but still.
>>83593472
I'm still stuck on the first line the mom says in the UK version
>crush on the boy opposite
Like what the fuck is this
Is this that cockney dialect I hear about
>>83596126
Come again? That was a page from the upcoming book 7.
>>83593486
Writing styles and how you present your dialogue seems to really matter. The frenchie who wrote the dialogue seems to have a few more books read under his belt, compared to the american variation where he expresses himself like an intellectually inept commoner.
>>83596166
im from london. that sentence doesnt sound strange to me but it probably isnt wording id use
>tfw no curvy, nerdy middle-aged woman to sit on you
>>83596102
Can't show this on facebook.
>>83596102
Tits are great, aren't they? The gay lads are really missing out.
>>83595552
Usually I like the lettering in the UK version more, but this one doesn't make much sense.
