Suck on THAT Watterson!
>>83550360
You can't put a price on principle, you fucking sellout.
I imagine Watterson is still pretty well off. I think they still publish Calvin and Hobbes books?
>>83550716
I thought Watterson wasn't interested in that stuff
>>83550874
I heard Jim Davis hires sign spinners to stand outside Watterson's house all day with his networth prominently displayed
>>83550360
And when he actually tries he's pretty good.
Just he doesn't need to try.
>>83551944
Right when Watterson is doing his daily painting bonfires?
Bellowing fire behind him.
"BUT I STILL HAVE MY PRINCIPLES JIM"
Looks back at the amber cascade.
"MY PRINCIPLES"
>>83550360
Jim Davis has admitted that Garfield was by design to be marketable. He didn't even try to make him funny.
>>83554100
True, though later he actually started caring about it.
But yea he was made to sell.
>>83550804
That doesn't apply to Watterson though, since he actively turned down merchandising and ended the strip when he felt it was right.
>>83554407
More like he got to it too late for some things. All those Calvin peeing on shit? Not a penny went to him because he never bothered to fight the copyright over it.
>>83550360
There is more than one wealthy man named Jim Davis.
New Balence Owner http://www.forbes.com/profile/jim-davis/
Cartoonist http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/authors/jim-davis-net-worth/
Bill Watterson http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/authors/bill-watterson-net-worth/
So the actual difference is 800m to 100m which is a factor of 8. Still a substantial difference, but one lacks the plague of terrible movies.
