>Tfw remember Hasbro and Sony put out a Jem "tribute album" last year
>Finally listen to it, mfw
Ok...so they aren't even covers of the songs from the show, it's just a bunch of completely original pop songs that sinply have been given the titles of songs from the show
WTF how many possible ways can you drop the ball
Go figure
>>83452508
Man, Hasbro doesn't even know what to do with GI Joe, what makes you think they've got a clue as to how to handle Jem?
>>83454488
It would be one thing if they just called it "original songs inspired by Jem", but they call it a tribute album....something I think most people equate to meaning "cover album", and not only that but they actually DO have the song titles of songs from the show
It's almost like they went out of the way to say fuck you
>>83452508
Fuck, that's truly awful.
>>83457785
Don't you mean truly outrageous?
>>83452508
bump
>>83452508
Whilst mostly true, it also is not. 'Glitter n Gold', 'Destiny' and one or two other actually use many of the lyrics from the original songs. So they are still covers to some extent.
>>83459790
Man, these are two completely different songs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjvfb8GqCl4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW6YtztJrfU
Literally the only thing in common is that the words "glitter and gold" are uttered in both songs lmao, they're not even sung in the same melody
Hasbro hates Jem
