Worth reading? Isn't this basically soft core porn?
>>83253862
>Worth reading?
>Dynamite
lol
>>83253862
I mean, if you want "basically softcore porn" read Tarot, which is at least endearingly stupid
What's wrong with reading softcore porn?
>>83253862
do we actually see her nipples?
>>83253992
just pasties, I believe
>>83253992
there are full frontal nude variant covers, but in the actual comic there is never any nudity.
>>83253992
Bare ass is shown a couple times but not any more than that
>>83254347
That's not how reflections work.
>softcore porn
>no nips
pg13 movies can show nips
>>83254387
It's not really how sheets work either
>>83253862
not worth it
>>83253862
>tfw you actually liked John Carter from Mars
>>83254347
that's not how sheets work
>>83254479
>from Mars
Whoops
>>83254479
It was a solid movie.
Disney just stopped giving a fuck at some point and didn't market it. Also I've heard the director had some autistic insistence on not titling it John Carter 'of Mars'
>>83254347
"I'll just use these sheets to cover a little bit of my chest and pelvic area"
>>83253862
>>83254347
See it's shit like this that makes decency rules so stupid. Clearly this is appropriate for teens and anyone who is ok with a teen rating, but if we saw a nipple/those pasties she was on were pink, it's be illegal for anyone under to 17 to see it.
>>83254564
Which is weird. "Mars" in any part of a title boosts ticket sales by like 10%*
*Source: My ass
>>83254347
why is does it look like she the the loops covering her nipples and pelvis are just stitched to the middle of the sheet. it isn't folder over and the boob one is clearly coming out of the middle of the sheet and not a corner.
>>83254698
It's the Gorilla of the 21st century.
>>83254710
clearly the sheets have some kind of chest strap to help her boobs defy gravity
>>83254698
I'm going to have to discredit your ass there.
>>83253897
Some Dynamite stuff is great-- like Ennis' Battlefields. Check yourself, m8
>>83253862
Being American must be hell - so afraid of anything sexual, yet attracted.
"Dont' think about sex, but do go forth and multiply"... woah, mental tightrope.
>>83253924
Seriously. And the man's idea of what constitutes sexiness in a woman is so... 20,000 BC.
>>83254479
I did. It was nice.
There's a fully explicit webcomic version of the book which is outright bizarre.
>>83255236
>webcomic version
link?
>>83254800
10% of nothing is still nothing.
>>83255345
Uh. Lessee.
http://www.erbzine.com/mag13/1316a.html
>>83255753
thanks
>>83254698
>Which is weird. "Mars" in any part of a title boosts ticket sales by like 10%*
Actually, it's seen as a curse in Hollywood. The Martian aside, movies with "Mars" in the title always seem to flop.
They should have called it Barsoom.
>>83254479
>finally get Barsoom movie
>but it's the Age of Faggotry so of course they have to recast the princess as some sort of fighting haxor
Insult added to injury desu
>>83254479
>Vur...jin-ya!
>>83257042
Yeah, but Lynn Collins was smoking hot
>>83257042
>>83257322
She was also my first pick for Wonder Woman.
>>83257388
Mine too. Fucking shame they wasted her as Silver Fox.
>>83257388
Gal Gadot was cheaper
>>83253862
Dynamite's "bad girl" books are GARBAGE.
Is there a good comic adaptation of the Barsoom stories? Like, at all? because I've only read the books.
>>83253942
Nothing.
But if I were going to read softcore porn, I'd hope it would be better drawn than this.
>>83254479
Its funny, Lynn actually demanded they give her a more revealing outfit that we got compared to what Disney wanted to put her in.
Based as fuck woman.
>>83258190
Dark Horse has some trades of various versions.
>>83260357
Not sure about this one...
I like the old Tarzan meets John Carter series.
For reasons.
>>83257322
All the more reason she should've been written as a smoking hot literally naked red damsel in distress.
