So is DCU: Rebirth technically a reboot, or...?
It's a retcon
>>83210406
It's not a reboot and it never was
>>83210406
It's a retcon of a reboot, basically DC took Synder's take on the Watchmen and put the blame of New 52 on Doc
>>83210406
Let me ask you this OP. Is the end of Back to the Future a reboot of the beginning of Back to the Future?
>>83210406
it's basically a Keikkaku
It's a ReRe. Just like everyone defending it.
It's an anti-reboot. It literally un-reboots the New52.
![1445453665486[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6eyChR6.jpg "1445453665486[1].jpg")
>>83210564
>>83210573
so will we get the real Mr. Fries back?
you know, the one with an ACTUAL wife?
It's like Heroes Reborn
>>83210699
>so will we get the real Mr. Fries back?
>you know, the one with an ACTUAL wife?
He's barely a character, but maybe.
It's a reboot but it's a bad word these days so it tries really hard to make you think it's not
>>83210737
In exactly what way is it a reboot? It reveals that the New 52 and the pre-Flashpoint universes are one and the same. We've been following the same characters all along, it's just that someone messed them up.
It's not a reboot, and it never was.
Rebirth retcons the New 52 into not being a reboot.
>>83210913
Then why are there two Supes?
>>83211624
We don't know yet, that's a plot point for Action Comics.
We know that they're not who they thought they were.
>>83210913
Really putting the CON in retCON amirite xd
>>83210406
It's more like a rollback.
>>83210699
probably, I mean they did say Love was stolen so it's easy to explain why they were not married.
>>83211624
Pre-52 Supes and Lois were captives of Brainiac so whoever's behind this made new ones to take their place. Mr Oz said that neither pre-52 nor 52 Supes are who they think they are or something like that.
>>83210552
*"Keikaku" means "plan"
>>83210406
I'm glad the costume lines meme has stopped.
How soft are Jon's nipples?
