If Frank went back in time to the American revolution, would he Frank the founding fathers for owning slaves?
>>82748131
The AMERICAN REVOLUTION? This is actually a much more interesting question than you'd think since most of the world was still cool with slavery in the 18th century.
>>82748190
yes, the American revolution. would he Frank them for owning slaves?
>>82748131
Quite Frankly he only kills racial caricatures like Paddy the Irish monkey or The Russian. So if the Slave owners were portrayed in an outlandish fashion Frank would have to kill them. The Punisher basically follows Jojos bizzare adventure rules where the more outlandish you are and dressed or act the more likely you are to be an antagonist frank is going to kill.
>>82748131
No, unless they whipped them personally.
Frank would Frank any sort of overseer, but the Founding Fathers were rich enough that they never had to deal with the mechanics of owning slaves.
If Frank believed that chain of command truly gives responsibility, then he'd off the President for all the atrocities the US Military ever did.
>>82748245
so any competent criminal s safe from frank?
>>82748290
Would Frak Frank the president for that?
>>82748485
He broke into the White House once and threatened to Frank the President for trying to kill him.
>>82748751
when?
>>82749867
Welcome Back Frank. It was the second time that The Russian had shown up, and it was thanks to Bush. I can't find the page, unfortunately.
>>82748131
Back then, slave owners weren't breaking any law
Frank kills criminals exclusively, so they would all be just fine
I like to think Frank's read "A Sound of Thunder" once in his life and knows the kind of shit that comes of going back in time and Franking people willy-nilly.
frank would frank slave owners. shit wasnt right then which was why they abolished it. id like to see frank go back in a time machine and go at kkk that tried to enforce jim crow laws
>>82748131
Yes, he would and we'd be living in the Unbtied Franks of Frankmerica now.
Would Frank just Frank everyone in existence that didn't conform to modern moral sensibilities barring of course being a murderous vigilante?
>>82748131
When's the last time Frank franked a guy who hadn't commited a crime?
For an antisocial guy, he takes all his morals from society's laws, it's a bit awkward.
So all in all, not, seeing as slave ownership was legal, he'd probably let them be.
>>82751853
>murderous vigilante
He kills those too.
The guy has shown no indication that he can make up his own morals, so either he'd take the laws of our time and apply them to historical times, or he'd just apply their laws.
>>82751903
Doesn't he try to give capeshit a wide birth?
If he was dropped back in time, I'd imagine he'd be smart enough to atleast not murder the fucking founding fathers.
What if Frank was born in the south and his family were killed by runaway slaves from his plantation?
>>82751930
>Doesn't he try to give capeshit a wide birth?
Probably out of obligation more than anything. I mean if he started murdering Avengers he wouldn't last long.
>>82751978
That seems like a contrieved way to make him into a racist.
>>82751996
*speciest
popular scientific theory at the time was that blacks were not really human.
>>82752008
I don't see what would make him the speciest.
>>82752039
*Intolerance or discrimination on the basis of species, especially as manifested by cruelty to or exploitation of animals by humans.
owners weren't really any crueler to blacks than they were to any other animals of the time
>>82748290
>No, unless they whipped them personally.
Frank would Frank any sort of overseer, but the Founding Fathers were rich enough that they never had to deal with the mechanics of owning slaves.
So if you hired an assassin to kill someone Frank wouldnt come after you for it because you didnt do it directly?
That seems like a pretty massive loophole.
I feel like this thread is mainly Americans not wanting to believe their revered founding fathers would be considered worthy of being killed by Frank.
>>82752065
I was just mocking your typo, tardo.
>>82752203
I'm a Euro and I don't think he would because he has shown no indication that his morals are separate from secular law.
>>82752269
He never gives a fuck about prostitutes or drug users.
>>82752256
its not a typo though. its literally how its spelled. 2 seconds in google would have confirmed this
>>82752323
Yeah but does he give a shit about people who cause harm within the limits of the law? I don't think so.
>>82752357
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/speciesism
>>82749867
bro, get with the program
We never see the Presidunce, but i bet he also looks like Frank
>>82752466
>call a character "warhead" in German
>can't even get the spelling right
God I hate capeshit writers.
>>82748131
>Reading this thread while watching an episode of Fresh Prince involving a man named Frank
Unintentional and weird
>>82752492
Ennis wouldn't literally call a character "warhead" but they'll get close.
>>82748131
depends entirely on if he's retarded enough to fuck up time.
>>82752476
I don't recall that sign looking so poorly done.
>>82752700
Since this is by Dillon we must be thankful the sign doesn't have a Frank face too ...
(
>>82748226
No, because they wouldn't be criminals
>>82752323
Frank lets prostitutes and drug users go because he sees them as victims. He kills the fuck out of pimps and drug dealers on the regular, though.
It's got nothing to do with the law itself, Frank's code of Franking is its own thing. And considering that he's Franked the fuck out of human traffickers on many occasions, I don't see why Southern slave owners would be exempt from having the same happen to them.
>>82752750
>Frank lets prostitutes and drug users go because he sees them as victims.
Unless they actually try to kill him.
>>82752727
There's a difference between what's morally correct & what's legal you doof
>>82752700
It was the early 00's.
>>82748131
best place to download cbr?
>>82752954
>Unless they actually try to kill him.
Well yeah, but that's a given
>>82752476
that sign looks so out of place
>>82751903
