Is that new Animated Spidey movie going to be based on Spectacular Spider-man?
Its most likely going to be standalone
Sony must have sunk in money before the marvel deal
I hope not. I want to see something new. However, I wouldn't be against having this mother fucker come back to play Peter.
>>82683217
>Standalone
I swear someone's dying if they cast Drank Bell.
>>82683073
No.
Disney is trying its hardest to make sure people forget about SSM or other non-USM Spidey shows, and Sony doesn't care.
>>82683280
>yfw they use i found a way as spideys new themesong
>yfw they cast brendan fraser as norman osbornes voice
Was the Spectacular Spider-Man ever shirtless?
>>82683409
>Harry is Josh Peck.
>Flash is Miranda Cosgrove
>They don't change his character design in anyway, he just has a really girly voice for some reason.
>>82683436
No. But he wore a tank top once and he looked well toned.
>>82683937
Do you recall when that was?
>>82683357
>We will never get a proper conclusion to Spectacular
>Meanwhile Ultimate Spider-Man is on its 4th season
>>82683991
It was around Season 1 Episode 10 when the symbiote was beginning to kick in.
>animated movie written by based Lord & Miller
>mcu film written by Vacation writers
why do they do this?
>>82684053
Thanks, I'll give it a look.
I'm surprised this Spidey was never shirtless, considering the USM Peter was shirtless twice in 4 seasons.
>>82684053
Yeah, in episode 11 he goes to sleep in a wife beater, and he looks pretty fit.
But there's something weird going on in the show that makes everyone's arms look like action figure arms when they're shirtless.
>>82684117
Why will you give it a look, anon?
Are your intentions noble? I hope you're not up to anything foul.
>>82684121
But Peter was never shirtless right?
>>82683991
Episode 11, "Group Therapy.
>>82684184
Nope.
>>82683073
>Our reboot was a failure. We tried to set up too many movies for one franchise.
>REBOOT AGAIN, NEW CONTINUITY
>ANIMATED MOVIE, ANOTHER NEW CONTINUITY
>VENOM MOVIE
>SEQUEL TO THE SECOND REBOOT
>THE LIVE-ACTION ONE, I MEAN
>>82684243
Wow, that tank top looks painted on, why did they even put it?
>>82684144
My friend, Atleast I'm not looking at nudes of them like Stephen Wacker.
>>82684400
Wait, they're going through with the Venom movie?
>>82684557
It's back on their release schedule.
