> trailer comes out
> people whine and bitch about Peters costumes yes
> movie comes out
> turns out, they are automatically adjustable, because Peters eyes are light sensetive.
Can we please stop judging movie details by the Trailer?
>>82602769
none of this post makes sense
people never criticized Spidey's eyes they usually pointed out the black parts on his arms and the small logo
>>82602780
They criticized the fuck out of it anon. /co/ was wrong as usual
>>82602769
My thing about his eyes is...if he needs the blinders because they're overly sensitive, how does he function normally out of costume?
>>82602796
You make it sound like it was a long time ago. It was only like 2 months ago and I remember the majority of people bitching about the black strips and only a few hating the eyes. But I agree with the point you're making.
>>82602858
Dude, literally everyone was shitposting endlessly about how eyes are shit because they are not muh mcfarlane
>>82602839
with glasses
>>82602858
I still don't like the black stripes very much, and I'd prefer more webbing. The costume did look much better in action than it did for the brief time it was in the trailer, though.
I always liked the eyes.
>>82602769
>Can we please stop judging movie details by the Trailer?
The purpose of the trailer is to make people judge the movie before it's out.
Also,
>we
>>82602954
True, but people keep clinging to minor insignificant details, like they make or break the film and start hating or loving the movie based on them before it comes out, which is fucking dumb.
>>82602922
I like the black stripes, I don't get why the top half has black while the bottom half has blue though.
>>82602973
>bottom half has blue
?
>>82602839
He even says the sensory overload happens "when things happen" - I suppose his spider-sense is tied to adrenaline.
>>82602769
>turns out, they are automatically adjustable, because Peters eyes are light sensetive.
As if this bullshit makes it ok. And now his eyes will do this shitty mechanical sound every time he "emotes".
>>82602769
>>82602896
Soooooo, Now he can do it. IRL!
Marvel is really getting smart with these emotive mask workarounds.
>>82603282
>getting
as if therere any more examples of Marvel making masks convey an expression.
>>82602769
I wish we got a better, longer look at the cheap homemade suit. Are there toys of it?
I hope his suit gets thrashed in Homecoming and he has to wear the old one again, temporarily.
>>82602769
>>82602796
It's an unnecessary explanation that made how silly the whole thing was kind of stand out.
Deadpool's eyes didn't need any camera shutters. They just moved. No need for overexplaining shit.
>>82604445
deadpool
>>82602769
>because Peters eyes are light sensetive.
This is never fucking said in the movie, you god damn troglodyte.
His "senses" overwhelm him. Meaning is fucking spider-sense.
>>82605240
Deadpool came from a cartoonier movie. The MCU is too grounded in realism for "they just move" to be acceptable
He says all his senses were dialed up to 11 when Tony asks how he can see in his crappy goggles.
All it really means is his vision is so good that even terrible dark goggles don't impair it too much. And the reason the goggles are dark, though not stated directly, is obviously so people can't see his eyes.
He doesn't actually need to block out light or anything. It's not like Riddick.
>>82606376
It's acceptable. And it's not only acceptable, by not bringing attention to it you avoid making how silly it is obvious.
Was the suit completely CGI? Or did they make a physical suit for Holland to wear for reference?
Even the bit in the airport where he took his mask off seemed like cgi
>>82606393
Or Spider-Man 2099 with Miguel being sensitive to light
>>82606420
I'm thinking it was probably Holland/a stunt actor in a mocap suit. I really hope they go with an actual suit for Spider-Man after this, the CGI isn't going to age well.
>>82606436
I hope so too
Granted these films are CGI heavy and that's completely understandable, but if they don't have Holland ever wearing a physical suit for his solo film it would kind of ruin the magic. I like the idea of there being a tangible suit for the actor to wear on set. I suppose for civil war it may have been because of a time constraint sorta thing or maybe because they didn't have enough time to get Holland into Spider-Man shape to look good enough for the suit
>>82605240
>>82606376
Deadpool's eyes were just that, eyes, all you need is to assume that his mask was made out of a material light enough to move along the face's muscles
Spiderman's eyes on the other hand cover much more that just the eyes and are usually depicted as made of more solid material like glass, that shit can't move period in a real life scenario
>>82606393
>All it really means is his vision is so good that even terrible dark goggles don't impair it too much.
>what is "spider-sense"?
Goddamn casuals.
>>82606524
You had to assume his mask perfectly covered the inside of his fucking eyelids and had white plastic lenses underneath them. Don't be stupid.
>>82605348
Thank you, I thought I had to fend for myself there.
>>82606524
>real life scenario
>>82606556
>What the movie says is wrong even though it doesn't actually contradict anything in the comics and I'm just being a contrarian dipshit.
>>82606629
>What the movie says
Has, literally, nothing to do with with light sensitivity.
>>82606629
>m-m-muh realistic fan theories!
are there any good images around yet of his amateur homemade suit before Tony upgraded him?
>>82606636
Thanks for agreeing.
>>82602769
>Can we please stop judging movie details by the Trailer
were you born yesterday?
>>82606656
It's pretty much this but with less detail, black eyes and one-piece mask, no hood. There is no good shot in the movie, we only see it in shit quality youtube videos and folded.
>>82606745
>the spiderling.
I can't blame him, the name fits for that at least.
>>82606420
>Even the bit in the airport where he took his mask off seemed like cgi
Nah, it's just because it's flat and there's no raised webbing - precisely how it should be.
>>82606774
Not really, it looked like CGI still.
>>82606824
Its a mocap suit. Its an actual suit, but they CGI'd the Spider-Man texture over it.
>>82606854
So in essence, it is CGId.
Are his web shooters mechanical or organic?
>>82606887
Mechanicalplease not here
>>82606887
Mechanical. And now they house a surface projectable stark tech computer interface...which he is also gonna use as a spot light to scare crooks.
Was anyone else weirded out that Peter and May were in an apartment and not a house?
I mean, change with the times and the viability of home ownership but still...
>>82606887
Watch the fucking movie.
>>82606436
>>82606516
As long as they keep the movable eyes and design of the suit.
>>82606934
It's whatever
>>82606905
>And now they house a surface projectable stark tech computer interface
This is literally never stated in the movie. Quit making shit up.
The only thing it has aside from actually shooting webs, is the spider signal.
>>82602954
>wuz
>>82606943
Why so hostile friend?
>>82606969
Because they flat out say whether or not its mechanical or organic in the movie. Watch it. Listen to what the characters say.
>>82606987
He was just asking a question though. What's your problem?
>>82606987
>Watch a movie you otherwise have no interest in to gleam one detail that could just as easily be answered by asking one question on an image board
>>82602796
>maybe 10 or so people complain
>/co/ is wrong!
I wish you faggots would stop trying to start shit.
>>82607037
>btfo toby fags revisioning history
Cry harder
>>82607083
I actually didn't care for the raimi films or the garfield films. Please kill yourself anytime
>>82605348
Not marvel, fox.
>>82602769
I was one of those people OP. I criticized the mechanical eyes narrowing because I thought it was fucking stupid. I get that they did it because it mimics the way he was drawn in the comics. It gives him a little more personality (which is a big part of how Spidey fights) and it was a fun little grab for the trailer.
But you know what. It was like a 2 second shot from an otherwise pretty damn great (but definitely not perfect ) movie. Didn't ruin it for me.
>>82607158
My problem wasn't the narrowing, it looked fine during fights. My problem was the stupid mechanical whirring it made.
>>82606964
In the post credits scene, it's got all those widgets rotating around it. If it was just a spotlight it would be a spotlight, not have all those stark tech projection thingies floating and turning around it.
>>82606964
It has an options menu as shown in the fucking movie, did you not pay fucking attention to the fuckinh ring around the spidey symbol you fucking mong?
>>82606964
Nigger you wot?
Did you miss the after credits scene? His web shooters host a computer now full of stark tech shit. It's got email, phone, tv, internet, etc.
>>82607014
Go pirate it then, asshole. Watch the scene.
>>82607510
>It has an options menu
It literally does not.
>>82607555
2 posts above yours
>>82607555
Did you not look at the corners you easily impressed sperg?
There is a fucking ring of options around the signal you dumbass, go watch the actual movie instead of the cam and pay attention.
>>82607592
>Did you not look at the corners you easily impressed sperg?
Yeah, its just generic tech porn. There are no actual "options" or "menus" so to speak of.
>b-b-b-but my headcanon is fact!
>>82607627
>there is no actual menu
Software dev here, ever heard of minimalist interfaces?
Pay attention, it's a menu.
>b-but it doesn't have words
Do you know what a menu is is you dumbass?
>>82602769
>Peters eyes are light sensetive
Aren't everyone's eyes light sensitive?
>>82607679
>Pay attention, it's a menu.
Not until it actually is shown being a menu on screen. As it currently stands, its a spot light. That's, literally, it.
>>82607723
It literally has a tv, internet, phone, and email icon rotating around the side of it. What the fuck did you even watch?
Why the fuck would spiderman need a spotlight? That's about as stupid as batman having the batsignal on his wrist.
"Oh shit, there's some crime here! Better summon myself by aiming my logo at the sky even though i'm right here! Best give the baddies warning that i'm like right outside their door!"
>>82607859
>Why the fuck would spiderman need a spotlight?
You just outted yourself as a gigantic fucking casual.
Spider-Man has ALWAYS had a fucking spotlight. Pic related is from ASM #5, published in 1963.
>>82607921
Nice way to deflect the fact that you're getting anally destroyed on the fact that his mechanical shooter is also a stark computer.
>>82607859
He used it as a flashlight when investigating sometimes, and scaring criminals. I feel like spotlight is the wrong word to use
>>82607979
>is also a stark computer.
Screenshots as proof?
>>82607859
>Why the fuck would spiderman need a spotlight?
He's had this since ASM #2, when he develops his utility belt, moron. We first see him use it in ASM #3 (pic related).
In the 60's animated series, it was moved to his webshooters.
Read a comic or two.
>>82608099
Better yet, why not go pay 8.50 and see it in action?
>>82608126
>>82608130
>and see it in action?
I've seen the movie twice. What you're saying is not in there.
Until you supply actual screenshots with hard evidence, you're just making shit up.
>>82608126
>I almost wish for a foe who can give me any real opposition
>gets the shit kicked out of him by Doc Ock hours later
Oh Peter
>>82608162
It's your word against the internets, dude.
>>82608381what site do you use to stream from?
>>82608464putlocker
>>82608381
It's also a menu?
>>82608381
Looks like menu options to me. You think they're gonna go full Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon and give him electric webs Ben Riellys impact webbing?
>>82608664
*or maybe Ben Reilly
also didnt he have a bunch of extra stuff in the cartoon like a targeting display?
>>82602769
You want a bunch of internet nerds to stop whining and bitching about nothing? Good luck, mate.
>>82608162
There are two post-credit scenes. You missed the second one.
>>82608893
I saw it. Twice. How else would I know about the spotlight?
>>82602796
No one complained about the eyes, at all, infact most of the more positive comments were aboit the eyes. The main complaints that people had when the unfinished cgi trailer came out was the lines on the arm and the lack of webbing over the costume. I have no idea what you are on about, but you are wrong.
/co/ was wrong!
>>82609056
There were some complaining early on. But it died quickly.
Most of the whining I saw was about it not being Toby, and that the suit looked too CGI:y
>>82608162
Go watch the second scene again and PAY ATTENTION, just because you are a fuckinh spaz that can't notice details doesn't mean everyone else is also retarded.
>>82608639
Yes, why do people argue against shit they didn't spot?.
>>82608962
You did see the SC yeah? You saw it twice and missed twice. Why argue like a tard?
Can someone point me to a decent camrip of this movie?
>>82602896
Raimi suit is still best suit
>>82608639
>bad guys get to choose the type of ass-beating they receive
>>82609818
sure thing, faggot.
>>82602896
literally every other suit was better than the CW suit
goddammit, marveldrones will lie to themselves about anything now
>>82610211
Just because this is true for Batman doesn't mean it's true for Spider-Man, I'm sorry that your opinion of the suit is so low. I just can't agree with you, the suit looks Spectacular.
>>82606393
He said his senses got dialed to 11 and that the eyes help him focus. They literally block out everything that he doesn't want to see. So he's not spazzing out from input overload.
>>82604479
we might see it in his solo film
>>82607691
his eyes aren't light sensitive. he said his senses were overwhlemed. which probably means he can't really handle being able to see as much as a spider can so he needs to tone it down
>>82602896
To be honest, I really liked how shiny ASM2 Spidey's eyes were.
>>82610664
That whole costume was great
>>82610840
WELL GARFIELD
YOU GOT YOUR WISH
>>82610976
NOT LIKE THIS, NOT LIKE THIS!
>>82602780
I was here when the trailer broke out and /co/ and /tv/ were just filled with Spidey threads. Literally the boards were just Spidey threads, especially /co/.Those goddamn frisbee threads did make me laugh
There were some that criticized Spidey's eyes and said how it looked stupid.
Anyone else feel the film overdid it with Peter being poor? Dumpster diving and all that. Makes it harder to ignore Peter being able to afford his web shooters.
The vast majority of /co/ instantly loved the costume.
>>82607723
So you think the phone, mail, etc pictures were just there as design? Fucking christ, don't be this stupid.
>>82610976
OH MY GOD ANDREW HAS PARKER LUCK
>>82610840
>>82610976
>>82611029
YOU GOT WHAT YOU WANTED
(BUT YOU LOST WHAT YOU HAD)
>>82610976
That fucking monkey's paw
>>82610158
Sure thing, Gaylord.
>>82610211
Here we see the DCuck being triggered about his fav movie being BTFO by a Marvel movie, resorting now to nit picking with his own, terrible opinion as back up.
>>82610840
I want to fuck this.
>>82602769
GAY
>>82611848
Oh that poor man
>>82602769
But at least the new guy they got to play him is cute. He was adorable as fuck during the fight.
>>82615782
I just like how his powers contrast the others. in a solo spidey movie, you never get a real feel for the scale of his powers, but the airport fight nicely contextualizes his abilities.
And I liked how nimble and bouncy he is, that's another contrast as well. all the other avengers are heavier or fly, but he just does whatever.
>>82615933
That too was nice to see. Like they said everyone has a gimmick but Spidey's powers are very unique and everything he does stands out as something all his own from his mobility to his fighting style as a hit and run kind of crowd control support.
>>82606420
>>82606436
>>82606774
>>82606824
>>82606854
>>82606881
I remember some interview a while back where a journalist or whatever visited the CW set and mentioned a "familiar red and blue costume" on set for the airport scene when questioning whether or not Spidey would be in the movie. This was before the trailer where he was revealed.
>>82608162
>tony stark builds a new suit for peter
>somehow the touchscreen computer webshooter is not starktech
>>82602769
>turns out, they are automatically adjustable,
We knew in the trailer they were automatically adjustable.
>>82616201
It is. Guess what will be used once Peter starts to disobey...
>>82602769
But I think the trailer is pretty good.
