Thunderbolts #2 unlettered preview. Moonstone, MACH-X, and Atlas were all right.
>>82550701
Oh, and Moonstone's alive again.
>>82550716
>What if Liefeld actually got gud: the artist
>>82550818
I wouldn't really call this good
>>82550855
it has good fundamentals; anatomy, proportion, perspective, action poses, kinetics, panel structure, all the stuff that keeps Liefeld from being a competent artist
problem is, aestethically he just copies Liefeld, with the jagged contour lines and crosshatches everywhere
>>82551098
Every background is a gradient and the proteins and placement on this page are screwed up >>82550732
The layouts are nothing to write home about, neither is the action poses
It's mediocre as hell and combined with the bad aesthetics I don't see how this counts as good
Geeze, this art is crappy.
something about this 90s ass art works for me
>>82550732
Looks like that thing's grabbing Mach-X/VII's ass
>>82551687
Wouldn't you?
My god that art his horrible.
Also why the fuck did they give them such 90s costumes instead of what they had last. Like what motivates that in the story? or did the artist just say fuck it they have their old costumes now deal with it.
art is garbage, costumes are garbage, comic will probably be garbage
>>82554086
seriously between this and new avengers I don't get it
why are artists taking 50 steps backwards? neither look like a modern comic at all and I mean that in the worst possible way
Is Osborn still the commander, or is this Waller or something?
>>82550818
This looks worse than 90's X-Force, Liefeld's art at least had a ton of enthusiasm behind it
