Is the book worth reading at all?
Sure, why not?
Depends on if you want to read the original, or the revised edition, made to be more like the movie.
>>82524644
wait, there is a book?
The book is nothing like the movie excepr for character names. Roger works as a star of a comic strip, not animated cartoons. Delves a little more into world building though.
>>82524644
Even the author thinks the movie is better and wrote a sequel that made the first book a dream.
>mfw the author of the book himself was considered to play the role of Eddie Valiant
>mfw he would have actually been a great choice
That said, Bob Hoskins was part of what made the movie so great so I wouldn't have it any other way.
>>82524644
I heard there's a Garfield-cameo
>>82524644
I've wondered the same, OP. I love the movie.
>steamy broads and killer creampies
MUH DICK
>>82529453
Also, is that Darren McGavin the motherfucking Nightstalker on the cover?
>>82524644 >>82529453
It's interesting if you like WFRR and want to see what absolutely negligible merit did the source material hold in the excellence of the result.
The novel has an interesting enough high concept, and gives it a simplistic, charmless and all-round terrible execution
>>82529669
>charmless
I don't know about that. I thought it was interesting enough.
>>82524644
Horrible book was Horrible. Jessica Rabbit was actually a Tijuana Bible starlett. Ending came out of nowhere (something about a genie). The whole thing was bad and completely without merit.
>>82531192
>Jessica Rabbit was actually a Tijuana Bible starlett.
This was the only sentence that mattered, and you know it.
>>82531192
The whole thing was very much like the Hammet/Chandler novels it was paying homage to.
Spoiler :it's nintendo
>>82524644
I liked it overall but got really let down by the end. But I'd say yeah, go for it.
>>82526740
really?
>>82531330
Yes. Sequel is "Who P-p-p-plugged Roger Rabbit?" and I believe another book got made following after "Plugged's" story called "Who Wacked Roger Rabbit?"
