no I believe he only goes after crimes where it hurts or kills someone else.

>>82495934
he kills people for littering, so yes.

No, he only attacks predators.
>>82496575
That was when the mob altered his mind to make him crazier.

>>82496624
No it wasn't

>>82495981
It hurts the publishers, so he would kill you.

>>82496663
Yes it was http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2011/12/20/the-abandoned-an-forsaked-did-punisher-just-shoot-that-litterer/
Granted, it was a retcon, but it was a necessary one.

Why the fuck doesn't someone just kill the Punisher? Go get Immune To Bullets Man to bash his head in with a tire iron.

I mean, Frank is an active serial killer that's done WAY worse shit than half the people he's murdered but none of the fucking capes or metahumans seem to give a shit.

Probably not, just like he doesn't kill prostitutes.

>>82495934
He can try, I'm behind seven proxys
>jaywalking
>implying I go outside
I'm invincible, fuck off Frank

>>82496748
That was a different incident

>Would The Punisher kill someone for
Yes

>>82496871
If 2 Punishers existed at the same time, would they try to kill each other?

>>82496985
According to Bendis in Ultimate End, yes.

>>82496985
no, they'd fuck

>>82495934
No, he really doesn't kill for victimless crimes. You'd probably get off with a stern warning if he even cared.

>inb4 that one time Frank shot some guy for a completely victimless crime
Let's not bring in one offs from bad writers that later got retconned into this discussion. Anybody who writes a half decent Frank won't have him kill somebody for littering. >>82495934

Torrenting isn't a crime, it's illegal.

You shitters should really educate yourselves.

>>82497074
Yea but how much can you trust Bendis?