What makes you unreasonably angry when discussing comics, /co/?
For me, it's when retards ceaselessly spout "edgy" as a buzzword when the slightest inspection of the materiel shows that it's not. It's a lazy buzzword that smothers any kind of actual thinking about context or intent.
>>81977647
>What makes you unreasonably angry when discussing comics, /co/?
That people get unreasonably angry about discussing comics.
>>81977647
Women discussing comics
>>81977647
People spreading misinformation about something via word of mouth, whether it's about creators or the story. Though it's more like it bothers me more than it should. There are better things to actually be angry about.
/co/
Nothing because I'm not an autist about comics.
>>81977647
When people use things from movies or elseworlds books to prove a "point" about a character.
>>81977647
Nothing, OP. I'm neurotypical.
>>81977926
How is that even a problem on/co/?
A screencap of one SJW tweet that will be read by 6 people gets a thread with 300+ responses while any thread discussing comics disappears in minutes.
>>81977647
>"Superman is a boring marysue"
>grouping DC with Marvel when complaining about SJW agendas, when it's clearly just Marvel forcing it so hard
Marvel
>Batman's not a super hero because he doesn't have super powers
>Superman is boring, because he's too powerful
Often by the same person.
>>81977647
When someone loves a mary-sue character but doesn't understand what a mary-sue is and why it's bad. And it's impossible to explain to them why you don't like the character because everything you can list as a negative comes off as a positive to them since everything wrong with the character is exactly what fools them into thinking they're a good character.
>>81978964
>>81979355
OP said "unreasonably angry" not "the cancer that has destroyed this board"
>>81977647
>Ywo weeaboo fucks are standing around in a Books A Million
>Overhear them stumble across a Witchblade paperback
>They begin bitching and moaning about how some asshole Americanized Witchblade
>They bitch about stupid Americans and how much they suck and cannot ever come up with something original and always steal from anime
>Bitching about how awful the art is and how the artist is shit for not getting the look of the main character right at all
>They leave the store too furious to remain because they are that personally insulted
>They are both wearing Naruto headbands in public
>>81978954
OP never specified it should be on /co/.Plus, I can sometimes tell it's a woman posting and it irks me.
>>81979493
Oh i just got mine.
It's when people make up stories about shit that made them angry that very obviously didn't happen.
What happened next anon? did you go visit your uncle who works at nintendo?
When people don't realize a book is edgy and think you're calling it that without knowing what you mean. It gets worse when they make edgy posts on /co/ about it
>>81979680
Kek. Beat me to it in a better way.
>>81979493
>He's defending weeaboos that rage in public
Company wars
not talking about comics
willful ignorance
>character x has the same power as character y therefore X is a ripoff
>I've read half a chapter of one characters comic book so I know for certain every book they have is shit
>this threads needs more company wars
People who like Lobdell
Also that one Simon Baz shitposter who is obsessed with his gun.
People who disguise their personal distastes under false criticisms of realism or practicality. If I could smother such ploys in their conceptual crib I would.
>>81979769
This.
That 50% of the board would stop posting here if we banned superhero movie discussions
>>81979899
Would that be a bad thing?
People that apparently get personally insulted when someone does not like their beloved favorite character. And then feel like they have to defend the honor of their fictional character.
>>81979927
It would be the best thing that could happen to this board
when you call some fags favorite thing garbage and give reasonable answers when they ask why and they take out personally.
>liking a comic I don't like makes you a shill/ storytiming is shilling
>That one Nicofag that still hasn't let go of Arena/undercover
>>81979899
>>81980070
You forgot the part where after you make a few reasons why you do not like the comic and why you never cared for their series, they just reply with "Kill yourself faggot" or a pic that captions the same thing.
>X-fags that only read X-books
>>81979128
>Superman is boring, because he's too powerful
This
Ultimatep pleb red flag
>>81977647
>What makes you unreasonably angry when discussing comics, /co/?
Flashfags
Both extremes of the "not muh" spectrum
Like when someone hates a well-written character only because it's different than other iterations. But on the flip-side it's just as annoying when there's a character who's so different from their usual depictions that they may as well be a different character altogether and people just say "You can't be mad, it's just a different version!"
>Character isn't nice/likable makes them bad
moralfags
>>81980016
What's the story behind this?
>>81980997
some retarded intern at CN drew that over a drawing of spike spiegel Kawamoto had made
>>81979899
If it were moved to a new board, /sh/ - Super Heroes
which board would you main?
>>81980016
Company Wars. I've always been a huge DCfag but the amount of shitposting on both sides has gotten quite annoying.
>>81979028
Like this shit right here.
>>81977647
How DC and Marvel utterly dominate most discussions.
>>81981976
It's because of the /tv/ invasion. /tv/ has always been a containment board for some of the worst shitposters and insane company-loyal autists. Since the Marvel movies hit big they've been flooding over here and engaging in their usually faggotry.
>>81981742
>new board
But /tv/ still exists. /co/ just needs some moderation, but that'll never happen.
>>81982039
I really don't get this though. What /tv/ related companies are worth fighting over?
>>81982039
When a topic threatens to overrun multiple boards, the most effective solution to date has been a new board to let it burn itself out. Worked for 2hu, pokeymans, horse fuckers. It's not like we don't have boards for all kinds of ridiculous stuff these days anyway.
>>81980101
>Assholes who defend blatant garbage and then whine when people call them out on it.
>>81979606
Are you implying OP is a woman?I'm not
>>81982160
I pretty much only defend things I haven't read or seen after seeing people trash them on 4chan.
>>81982209
I am not.
>>81977647
When someone who has never read comics before because it is beneath them, tries to tell me why my taste is wrong, because they saw ant-man last month.
I am all for everyone enjoying the movies, but anyone coming to the table to have a fun discussion on comics had better have at least noticed the lack of wife beating in Ant-man.
Additionally, when someone insults muh Aquaman. I personally appreciate him as a character and have especially rather enjoyed all of the recent run.
>>81982876
It's not like he beat his wife all the time. There were a couple incidents, when he was all hepped up on science, or she was.
>>81982944
But you can't tell me that a little part of you was wondering how or if they were going to incorporate it in anyway.
They even worked in a way to make Ant-man and Yellow jacket both be part of Hank Pym. If anything, it was a discussion point for comic fans.
>>81979128
It's not JUST because he's too powerful, but sure, condense it to justify your autism
>>81982160
I'm not defending it but it kills all Nico, runaways, and even A-force discussions. It would be fine if it was relevant but if Nico even gets mentioned it turns into muh witch arm shit. It's been three years anon let it go.
>>81981976
>calling out my post as company wars
let me clarify
>Marvel comics
they been fuckin' up, and it's pissing me off
kinda hyped for Young Animal tho
>>81983870
Ah, I see. I agree in that case then. Then again, I think Marvel and DC have been fucking up for quite a long while.
>>81977647
>What makes you unreasonably angry when discussing comics, /co/?
Not having read the comics is one thing I can excuse, not everyone enjoys the medium and doesn't want to spend the time to gradually work their way into extensive superhero settings.
But people who then turn right around and IGNORE or DISMISS points from the comics and treat the movies as invariably the "true" interpretation and disregard every other contradicting point are fucking infuriating.
>>81982876
>>81977926
Why?
>>81984874
Report rather than respond to trolls.
>>81977647
>[blank] is so lame and kiddy, I only read mature, grim books like Batman/Punisher
>>81983410
Why the fuck would they do that on a movie that is aimed to a general audience, not to mention that shit was shot down by Feige.
>>81977647
People admitting that they buy Bendis GotG or bringing up anything from that shitty comicm
>>81984874
Because reasons, the tl;dr is I'm old and bitter.
>>81985057
Not trolling. son, OP did say "unreasonably" angry.
I really hate when comic writers have public twitter accounts but block anybody who tries to talk to them about their work.
What's the fucking point? Just stay private and follow your little buddies in the industry.
>>81977647
>using a shiklah image
you're epitome of nigger cancer.
>>81984823
One.
More.
Day.
>>81984823
People who give Aquaman shit because of this series/Family guy drive me nuts.
>>81988940
how would you feel if people were asking you the best method to flip burgers all day?
>>81977647
When people use adaptations as examples.
When people use pre-Flashpoint feats as examples.
>>81988940
You know sometimes people are open to discussing shit with people they dont necessarily know....but not about their fucking profession.
I mean honestly in this situation you seem kind of like a jack ass. I don't throw around the word entitled a lot. But being pissy because someone wants to have some shit on the internet open to the public but on their own terms and therefore is not open to your questions about their work seems pretty fucking entitled. Also gay.
>>81994086
>Unreasonably angry
>One More Day
Pick one.
Whenever someone says something silly in regards to female characters.
"Not a lot of female characters have the power of flight."
"There aren't a lot of female lead books."
"Well, they only just recently started giving women their own titles."
x vs y thread where everybody only knows what one of the characters can and/or post illegitimate feats
batman fanboys
When I look at a conversation where one person is technically correct, but they talk like an asshole and drive the other person away.
Like, some chick says, "Wonder Woman's the first female superhero!", you COULD try to engage her interest and guide her to something older she might enjoy. But instead more often than not I see people going, "ACTUALLY YOU'RE WRONG LOOK AT ALL MY SOURCES SO YOU KNOW YOU'RE WRONG AND I'M RIGHT."
It just. You lose your message in your presentation, and you don't even realize it.
>>81995406
>"Not a lot of female characters have the power of flight."
Seriously?
>>81977647
>What makes you unreasonably angry when discussing comics, /co/?
Faggots describing a character as 'cute' or a book as 'fun' as reasons for either being good.
>>81995650
I also hate faggots that say, "YOU'RE JUST MAD THE WRITER ISN'T PANDERING TO YOU!", when someone rightly claims the SJW bullshit running rampant through comics needs to stop.
>>81979899
>>81980019
>>81981742
You guys are supreme faggots. Super Heroes are the backbone of comics and their films are part of comics in the media. /co/ is not just printed material
also
>implying superhero movie's provide less valuable discussion to the board than shit like whether a fox and rabbit are going to fuck in an unannounced movie or the endless gay threads
>>81977647
>A person who is not white is introduced to the comic or is the main character of a comic
>entire threads of the phrase "SJW/tumblr pandering" appear
>>81995704
Was there any backlash against Kamala or shills did their job well?
>>81995459
Isn't Wonder Woman the first female superhero though?
Well the first who wasn't a secondary character in someone else's stories?
Not trying to disprove your point, I'm just wondering.
>>81997042
Fantoma or whoever, from the guy who made stardust
>>81984874
Because he's 25 years old and blames women for his virginity
>>81995459
Not everyone has a "message". Politics are cancer.
