What went wrong?
>>81660062
I don't mind any of these. I'm just annoyed about JLaws apparent makeup allergy that they somehow can't work around.
>>81660062
CGI became way cheaper. Also if you see Jlaw you can say no to make up that upsets your akin and have the whole move reworked to accommodate you.
>>81660100
>makeup allergy
It's called being a diva cunt.
I like Nightcrawler, but I don't get why they gave the younger one the scars/tattoos that Alan Cumming's had.
Especially since this movie is post-reboot/timeline reset whatever the fuck.
Why do they insist on scaly wet Mystique? It looked awful in X1-3 and it looks awful now.
also glasses on Beast never made sense to me. Enhanced strength, reflexes, speed, sense of smell and hearing but oh whoops, eyes are still fucked.
>Beast now has a cat nose
>>81660187
He doesn't need them, he wants them. Its a relic of when he looked like a person.
Visually it also makes him look like a horrible cat-man who is also a refined professor which is, y'know, Beast.
>>81660136
They were from Kurt punishing himself.
He still looks like a demon. He's still going to harm himself.
Beast just reminds me of that were-cat incest monsters from Sleepwalkers.
>catlike Beast
>what is tertiary mutation
It's like you people don't read comics at all
Because Americans have been raised on shit sandwiches all of their lives and don't know that they're eating shit.
Kurt looks the most the same in terms of quality of make-up
>>81660279
I actually like the cat-like beast more than the old gorilla-like one in the comics, but it's the other way around in the movies. I guess it's just one of those things that don't translate well into 3D.
>>81660288
Yeah, I sure love the European comic book movies coming out.
Why are you on a board anti US shit posting when 99 percent of the media discussed here is made by Americans for Americans
>He doesn't need them, he wants them. Its a relic of when he looked like a person.
Did he also had all that disgusting facial hair? I can understand how shaving your entire body may be a problem but whats the excuse for that un kepped neckbeard? At least a trim with some clippers would do better than how he just lets it all lose and shit
>>81660279
Out of all the things they for once decide to stay true to the comics, it's the most retarded looking character design ever thought up...
>>81660231
I haven't read X-Men in years but when I did I remember him putting them on to focus on something on one of his monitors or something indicating that he needed them to see. Whatever, I just thought it was interesting that all of his other senses were enhanced but his sight.
>>81660132
No, it's called latex. Latex is a sensitizing agent; eventually it'll provoke such a strong immune response from even a very small contact that her dragon dildos will set it off with the slightest touch.
>>81660100
The options are greasepaint (which is pretty shitty; it can look good, but it comes off quite readily and it's more useful for live theater where people in the audience can't see you up close), a bodysuit and greasepaint (which is better, because there's less of it to continually have to touch up and it means you can sit down on props without painting them the same color as you), or CGI.
CGI is prohibitively expensive for a full-body, full movie character's appearance, especially for a leading actress whose fans are propping up the gross; greasepaint doesn't hold texture well, so for the close work you'd have to do something else anyway.
>>81660187
Because something else requires people to spend time designing, pitching, and approving it. It's going to take at least a dozen people (concept art, makeup, financial producer, director, stunt choreographer - who needs to know they can work with the costume convincingly - and so on). and they all have to be paid for their time. Whereas the scaly look has already been approved and doesn't need to be changed.
Basically, the same reason they're using the exact same digital props for Wolverine's claws after 16 years - developing something new costs money.
>>81660399
Asterix? Tintin? The first four Superman movies, financed and made in Europe? The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, V for Vendetta, and From Hell, written by Europeans and mostly filmed in Europe, as well as being set in Europe in 2 out of 3 cases even in the film versions? Dredd?
>99 percent of the media discussed here
Why don't you start a sit-in and see if anybody cares what you think?
>>81660928
>Asterix? Tintin?
Those are movies? Because if so, nobody in the US has seen them.
>The first four Superman movies, financed and made in Europe?
That doesn't make them European lol, Superman is American.
We use your land to film our movies, what's your point? They are still American movies by American companies about American characters primarily for American audiences.
These days you could argue the Chinese have some pull, that's about it, not Europe...LOL.
>>81660062
The old make up artists were better. That's it.
>>81660062
They stopped giving fucks about those movies. And me too, since X-3 the franchise has become "Hugh Jackman in tank top & friends", and later "Hugh Jackman and/or JLaw show".
>>81660062
Casting, even cyclops is more of a betafag than he was in origional timeline. And jean is supposed to be good looking, not a monster like they cast now
>>81660187
It was to make it look like the cartoon everyone loved. He only used them to read
>>81661247
>I don't find her attractive so I'll complain.
Every time.
>>81660100
Wouldn't her character make her the perfect actor to be replacable?
I mean, contracts aside.
>>81660279
Reading comics doesn't mean you think every stupid decision they make is good.
Kelsey Grammer beast was so perfect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvHW1oIKUxI
Different make-up artists.
>>81660062
Fraiser Beast the best Beast
>>81660271
Is that Scooby Doo and the Zombie Island?
>>81661221
Yeah, and it sucks. I love Hugh as Wolvie, but god damn I'm sick and tired of X-Men being centric on him and not the team as a whole, and F U C K Jlaw. I wish 3 wasn't as shit as it was. 2 was such a step in the right direction and it was all fucked by 3.
>>81662479
Yeah, it was the live action remake from last year.
>>81662377
Now THAT is the Beast i know and love. He's such an outsider even amoung the X-Men, not that he isnt loved by them but because the X-Men dont really understand his brain. He goes off on intellectual tangents all the time and no one can follow him, even other intellectuals because most of them are scientists and then he starts talking poli sci or lit and even they are lost. He may not be as smart as Reed but his knowledge of arts and culture has no comparison
>>81662437
That's obvious.
>>81662437
Agreed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvHW1oIKUxI
>>81662437
>Abe Sapien & Beast at the Cafe Nervosa.jpg
Alternatively Emperor Zombie & Sideshow Bob.
>>81662080
I thought pretty much the same thing.
I mean, she's a fucking shapeshifter, right? If anyone can get away with changing actors it's the one who's whole thing is changing into different people.
Plus, one would think that a severe allergy might be enough to nullify a contractual obligation.
>>81660062
The make up on the new Mystique looks so shiny and cheap.
>>81660062
The gut playing Beast would've made a better Cyclops
>>81663120
Lol.
-The wizard of Oz
-Dune
-Goldfinger
The make up allergen stories that came from these shoots are legendary in how little the studio gave a shit.
>>81662623
damn he was perfect...
>>81664236
And to think they wasted GOAT Beast casting on that shitshow...
>tfw I more aroused by JLaw being "naked" in blue make up than by her actual nudes
send help
>>81664634
The mutant cure part wasnt bad it just didnt get flushed out enough.
>>81660216
Bronson should be released goddammit
>>81664704
Yeah but it also had other problems
-Dark Phoenix Storyline not done well
-Bad Juggernaut
-The literally whos that was Magneto's army
-Stormberry given more screentime
In fact parts involving the cure were the only decent parts in the movie
>>81665065
Yup. Too many cook
>>81665065
>Stormberry given more screentimeis that a complete bad thing?
>>81665065
Hyping angel for no reason as well
>>81660062
Nothing. People's appearance changes with age.
>>81660062
I'm actually quite fond of Jennifer Lawrence and Twink Nightcrawler.
>>81665343
In Last Stand? Yes. Did not like her.
In the first two movies+DOFP she was alright.
>>81665343
Ha, if her tits would have been that big this would have been far more popular when it came out.
>>81660216
>>81662314
lol
>>81660399
Europe has some pretty solid movies in general. As for comic movies, if you haven't heard of Asterix, it's really YOUR loss. I'll take Gerard Depardieu over Cavill any day.
>>81660928
Aside from Asterix and Dredd, you didn't really list any good examples. Just sayin'...
>>81660062
Why is the new paint so much lighter? The dark one looked absolutely perfect in all light conditions. Kelsey Beast is JKSimmons's JJJ tier.
How can they go from so wrong to so right? It was a Matthew Vaughn cast, too, not Brian Singer.
>>81660928
John Rhys Davies was allergic to his Gimli makeup but still played Gimli because that was the job he agreed to. It's bullshit that JLaw plays herself or a member of the Blue Man Group just because she doesn't want to be uncomfortable for a few minutes of shooting.
>>81668648
>How can they go from so wrong to so right?
Obviously the other way around.
Did they fire all of their makeup artists after X3 or something?
>>81660187
>Why do they insist on scaly wet Mystique? It looked awful in X1-3 and it looks awful now.
Mate, I rubbed out to Lizard Mystique many a times.
>>81662437
10/10 and in the worst movie, too.
>>81660062
Blue Man Group makes movies now?
maybe i just have my facts wrong but i swore nightcrawler was mystiques son.
How old is she in this new movie that her son is like 16?
>>81670212
They aren't related in the movieverse.
>>81660216
>never killed anyone
>still in prison
British people are such pussies.
>>81670212
Well it takes place in the 80s meaning she's 20 years older than she was in first class... so like 50?
>>81670320
is that the actual case or just what we assume?
>>81670398
I guess if you look at time that makes sense. I was going off of Jlaws appearance.
Does mystique not age the same?
>>81660928
>dragon dildos
Those are made out of silicon, not latex.
Sorry that was the only thing that set me off.
>>81660928
>CGI is prohibitively expensive for a full-body
Back when LotRs and Avatar first came out maybe; but Dawn/Rise of the Planet of the Apes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lezfSnO9n5g
>>81670473
No one in these movies age but yeah there was a line in first class and I think the very first x-men movie about it
>>81660062
man Kelsey makes a good looking beast.
>>81670920
>No one in these movies age
So sliding timescale is cannon to the Fox X-men?
>>81670920
Yeah Prof X is supposed to be like in his 50s still played by a guy in his 30s.
>>81670473
>Does the woman who can look like anyone she wants age?
What do you think?
>>81660062
>not posting Chin Grey
>>81671195
If there's one thing that the X-movies did right it was casting Kelsey as Beast.
I believe that is the sole reason why X-3 was mediocre as opposed to sucking.
>>81671949
Wasn't Xavier in his 30's or 40's when he formed the X-Men? He fought in the Korean War and X-Men #1 came out 10 years after it ended.
>>81664686
Dr Smurf reporting in.
>>81662377
One of the few God tier casting choices. Too bad he was wasted on that shit movie.
That seems to happen a lot; GOAT casting choice completely wasted on a mediocre to shit movie.
>>81660279
Not shitty ones.
>>81660062
Grammer is god-tier
>>81665640
>In the first two movies
No she wasn't. That scene with her and Kelly was godawful and she can't deliver a one liner to save her life
>>81672129
why
>>81672129
Terrible! The old cast at least looked their part
>>81674162
>"Do you know what happens to a Toad that gets struck by lightning?"
I'm not blaming that one on her. They could have done retakes.
Any of the crew+Bryan Singer (who later lamented about the line) could have figured out the obvious joke and said "oh wait that's what the line is suppose to be" but nope....
"Same thing that happens to everything else"
>>81662798
You're mistaken anon, its Doug Jones who plays Abe sapien
>>81674982
Ah, but he didn't voice him. That goes to Niles and Stan Smith strangely enough.
>>81674982
Gad damn it, he didnt even need makeup for that role
>>81660062
Kelsey's Beast is fucking awesome, but it still reminds me of Ganondorf.
