Somebody fucking tell IGN to stop review animation.
>>80876258
*reviewing
Fucking typos.
>>80876258
can't spell ignorant without IGNI'm so glad all these sites are jumping ship from video games
I'm gonna take a shot in the dark here and guess Max Nicholson.
I sincerely doubt this guy is going to watch ever episode, no matter how "great" he thinks it is.
>>80876747
Ironically, there are people who think it's shit that are going to dedicate themselves to watching every single one.
>>80876258
They are running into the same problem /v/ is. Nothing is really happening, nothing new to discuss so they are trying to find anything to rip into.
How much did Cartoon Network pay them?
>>80876258
>>80876783
It's scary that we're on a board full of grown men, angry at a cartoon made for little girls.
Who cares what it's like? You're not the target audience, kids...mostly girls are.
>>80876258
>That time IGN reviewed Monster Musume no Iru Nichijou and admitted they didn't even finish the first episode
IGN just needs to stop reviewing everything in general.
>>80876258
>great visuals
Compared to what? Problem Solverz?
>>80876806
More than the fags here who do it for free, you can be sure.
>>80876844
>Kids from the 90's watch the original PPG
>They love it
>Fast forward to 2016, those kids are grown up
>PPG reboot comes out
>It's shit
>"lol who cares its 4 little girls and shit"
>>80876844
>It's scary that we're on a board full of grown men, angry at a cartoon made for little girls.
If you're just barely figuring out, this website isn't for you.
>>80876844
Guess what Craig doesn't like it either but he can't do shit about it because CN owns the PPG.
>>80876783
I know, since I'm one of them.
>>80876258
they're either being bribed, threatened, or blackmailed to do this
>someone was paid to write this
>>80876258
>nice visuals
objectively wrong
>>80877220
>>80878045
No, he is wrong.
These are nice visuals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-ji8Oo5q3o
>>80877919
the power of mun-neh
>>80876844
I'm pretty sure that part of the charm of the original ppg is that its target demographic was both boys and girls.
>>80876483
>spoiler
Any reason why they are?
>>80876258
Somebody tell retards to stop giving page views to IGN
>>80877220
>Craig doesn't like it either
Source?
>>80876258
Or you know, to stop reviewing in general.
>>80878966
I'm not defending this review, but you do know multiple people work at IGN?
They all have difference tastes and opinions so comparing one review to another doesn't work at all.
IGN doesn't actually give a shit about western animation, they just review reboots for geek brownie points.
The only other cartoons they review are like, Ultimate Spider-Man and TMNT, which OBVIOUSLY warrant further observation.
>>80879442
So what's the point in a site giving a score at all if you have to research each individual writer's history and preferences to put it in context anyway?
Then again why even look at a site that will assign some poor bastard to write a serious review for an actual fucking baby game and then give it the default "7.5/10 - it's okay" IGN score anyway?
>they gave Super a 5
>God Hand gets a 3
>yet this gets an 8
>>80876258
>Nice visuals
What the fuck? Are they blind?
>voice actors do a great job,
>but...
But fucking what? So they didn't do a great job if you miss the originals. This review is retarded.
>people haven't realized IGN was probably most certainly paid to give this a good review after all those animation errors google image backgrounds and spelling error
>>80880333
>IGN was probably most certainly paid
Yup.
>>80876258
I wonder how much CN paid for this review.
He should just move on. Don't keep sulking about it like Lauren did with her horses.
>>80880846
He has since season 4, she has since Wander Over Yonder.
>>80880880
Didn't WOY get cancelled? I keep seeing mixed messages. If so, they should make something together. Could be interesting.
IGN cant review ANYTHING properly. I remember they rated an anime poorly because "its not my thing" and "I only watched 5 mins of it". Fucking Christ. Theyre only around because companies pay for good PR
>>80880943
Yup. It got cancelled because "reasons".
>>80876258
I like the show, but I think the only way to actually like it is to distance yourself from the original and take it for what is, by itself. I mean, no matter who they have working on this, it won't compare to the show that Genndy Tartakovsky AND Craig McCracken directed several episodes of together.
>>80879984
> a serious review for an actual fucking baby game
Actually I didn't catch their Street Fighter V review, what did it say?
>>80878057
That would be correct if CN didn't shit all over batman and DC comics as well.
>>80880315
It's a paid review.
>>80882070
But anon, CN treats TTG soooo good!
>>80879984
it's all meaningless. people review books, at least a few hundred people I'm sure. the critical review a book gets has 0 effect on how well it sells, or if it finds an audience, and if that audience likes it or loves it. it's a statistical fact that close to no one that has ever paid for a book has bothered to read a book review about said book.
tl;dr
>professional criticism is the height of intellectual masturbation.
and I can't think of a single video game I own that I've ever read a review for. they are totally meaningless, either I'm interested in it, or someone I talked to face to face said it was alright.
>>80876258
>>80876258
>>80876258
>Counting on IGN for reasonable reviews
>>80882492
>Kinda liked Greg Miller
>He was in that retarted gamer male privliage video
>This shitbird is in Greg new's company
Fuck IGN, Greg Miller, and this faggot.
>>80882492
This is the baitiest bait I've ever seen.
