Will an animation studio ever make another photorealistic film?
No because they should just hire actors. It avoids the cost and skill required to avoid the uncanny valley.
>>80712329
Why does this movie look so much like Mass Effect
>>80712377
This.
Beowulf came out 6 years later.
>>80712329
This looked a lot better in 2001 than it does now.
>another
lol
>>80712664
Mass Effect hacks admitted to draw inspiration from Spirits Within during ME3's development.
Don't know how much did it inspire first two, but by the time they were making ME3 only Bioware's hacks were left.
![Adventures_of_Tintin_01[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ndVm6tY.jpg "Adventures_of_Tintin_01[1].jpg")
Is Tintin just cartoony enough to not qualify?
>>80713089
Hnnng Angelina Jolies naked scaley everything birthing monsters from kings and what not
>>80713214
>That evil Spielberg
>>80713214
I fucking loved this movie and man, is it incredibly good looking.
Sequel fucking when?
Rango was pretty realistic texture.
>>80713214
One is slated for this very year, but information on it is scarce.
>>80712329
If the characters are photorealistic human just like FFSW or this >>80713089 there is no point in making the movie CG.
If however one plays around with proportions to make the characters photorealistics and yet stylized like >>80713214 or >>80714729 then I'm all for it. Tintin was great.
>>80713560
>Model Rachel Bernstein (uncredited) was the body double for Angelina Jolie in the film's nude scenes.
Isn't that basically what Avatar is?
>>80715735
No, in Avatar only the blue monkeys were CGI, everyone else was real actors being filmed.
>>80712329
It's difficult to stress just how big of a failure Spirits Within was.
Maybe, someday in a distant future we'll see an upsurge of photo realistic. But it's 15 years later and Spirits' Within is still the poster child of massive cinematic flops.
>>80712329
Stop making these threads, we're on to you George Lucas
