What does /co think about this?
>>80335350
Garbage.
>>80335360
Why?
Wait. Is this victorian insect porn?
>>80335350
Depends, is it porn?
It involves lesbian bug women. I haven't read it yet, but I really want to.
>>80335492
>>80335532
It's softcore pseudo-porn about lesbian insect ladies who spend their lives fucking eachother and brutally killing men.
It's also entirely awful in almost every way.
>>80335532
It's kind of softcore victorian bug women's stuff...
I just can't decide if I like this or not.
From the writer of [Nope, too gross. Sorry.] comes: lesbians killing cis-scum in victorian-era England.
"This is the pinnacle of the medium."
-some blogger
"10/10"
-Comicsalliance
"Handjob 3$, Blowjob 5$"
-yuore mothers
>>80335350
>two insect lesbians have a boy baby somehow
Fuck you.
>>80337174
You literally have no imagination.
Decent enough. A lot of it is wish fulfillment, but the art is gorgeous, the pacing is pretty good, and the main villainess is really fucking evil in the best possible ways. I do wish it hinted a bit more at where the bug eggs came from, but other than that it's entertaining.
>>80337697
>Main Villainess
What main villainess? Blonde Girl was killed in part 3 of this drek.
>Pacing
???????
>>80337697
Bennett is a lesbo?
>>80337780
The Countess. Issue 3 just ended with harpy claws flying towards her, and they weren't the MC's. So I don't think she's dead. Figure she's just been taken over by a rival monster or something of the sort. We'll have to wait and see.
>>80337908
I dunno.
>>80335532
Yes, a lot of it is softcorn porn.
>>80337908
That or bisexual
Everything she's written so far has gay women in it
>>80338447
That's like saying Bendis has to be black.
>>80335350
never heard of it
>>80337908
She's bisexual.
>>80337697
Do you really think this is good?
I mean like I'm fucking 'what' at "the art is gorgeous" but then everything you say makes less sense. The pacing is good? The pacing is so bad the comic appears to have no plot. There is no main villainness, because the villains keep dying providing perhaps a trivial challenge, if they are lucky.
This is the most I've ever disagreed with you but Insexts is fucking crap. It's dull, it's boring. It promises gore and provides a few red paint explosions. It promises sex and provides the tamest of lesbian trysts.
Someone in one of these threads a few days ago mentioned "The Princess Who Loved Insects" which I went and read and which is some kind of very well drawn Nausicaa transformation hentai comic. I didn't find "The Princess Who Loved Insects" arousing but it was spectacularly more effective as an erotic horror comic than Insexts because IT ACTUALLY EROTICIZES WHAT IS HORRIFYING IN IT. Insexts NEVER does that.
I didn't find Insexts compelling from the first but it died to me with the doctor who was a laudanum addict. The scene is a bad doctor delivering a child which actually turns out to be a tumour in the stomach of the patient. You don't see any of this and that's terrible because there is the real horror of a reproductive system, there is the real horror of malpractice. Instead what we get is that doctor being eaten by a SyFy channel butterfly monster in what must be one of the least shocking incidents of vaginal horror in the last decade. They don't even show the goddamn pussy, but maybe they don't need too because the comic as a whole is already too much about pussying away from what it wants to be.
>>80340171
>>80338447
>>80337908
She Kate Leth and Noelle Stevenson are the bisexual mafia ruining your comics ;^)
>>80340449
But I like Noelle Stevenson's comics.
And I like... some of Leth's comic strips?
>>80340470
The ;^) is a memeface indicating a certain level of facetiousness anon ;^)
>>80340557
Ooooooooh. I was tricked.
You are a good tricker.
>>80340407
The one thing I will say about Insexts is it gets across unstated details about each character well. I have a lot of time for any comic, novel, film, etc. that can do an unstated plot and Insexts is good about hinting, or letting you assume plausible details, about its characters backgrounds and motivations without doing anything more than having them take a natural course of actions.
>>80340638
Yeah but that's because they're one note characters. Maid wants sexy time with mistress and protects the mistress for snu-snu/secrets. Mistress is lesbian bug avenger and wants to go and take out men she deems evil. Blonde girl hates mistress for racist and rich bitch but technically true reasons but is still killed/evil. That's not really good writing, that's just seeing 2+2=4.
Also if Indian girl was really a superhero instead of an opportunistic killer with a messiah complex, why isn't she hunting down the London Ripper who's probably killed children and women alike?
>>80335350
>Marguerite Bennett
I saw it on /aco/, I wasn't aroused.
So what exactly is insect about them?
They look like humans.
>>80343724
Why do people post non porn comics there anyway?
