I'm no comic expert (in fact I haven't read a dc comic in 5 years or so) but don't you guys think that having 4 iconic characters of comic history into one movie is a little risky? how are they gonna develop them? sounds like a huge mess to me.
>Snyder
It will be shit.
>>78604052
lol manomurder amiright?
>>78604044
There's Batman
There's Superman
There's a Batman vs Superman fight
It might not be good but go fuck yourselves if that's not entertaining
>>78604044
>4 iconic characters of comic history into one movie is a little risky
Avengers exists.
I belive in Aquamomoa.
Been waiting 2 years for this movie and I won't let a few sceptics derail my hype train. The trailers look solid so I have little doubt this will be good fun to watch.
>>78604067
All his movies are shit senpai
>>78604044
it's not even a good match-up. Supes vs Green lantern, I'd like to see that. Hell Batman vs Luthor could be interesting.
but BvS is pointless because the sole deciding factor is if Batman has kryptonite. If Batman has it, he wins, and if he doesn't, he loses. That's pretty boring yet it's all it comes down to. May as well just flip a coin
>>78604397
>inb4 fags saying ''Avengers are not iconic''
>>78604461
>Superman
Already had an entire movie setting him up. Check.
>Batman
Although this Batman is different, the character itself just had three wildly successful movies. People know Batman at this point. And in any case, the focus here is less on his character than it is on his conflict with Superman.
>Wonder Woman
She doesn't factor in as heavily as Bruce and Clark, and she'll be getting her own movie next year. They only need to cover the bare essentials for now.
>Lex Luthor
Lex is the one who will require the most development. But, since the other three are covered, that shouldn't be a problem.
This "bloated mess" meme really needs to die. It's a bullshit argument that can be defeated with about 30 seconds of critical thinking.
