>>78397922
Pretty much.

File: FeedtheKitty_zps77c9baab.jpg (21 KB, 400x298) Image search: [Google]

21 KB, 400x298

Looks like autocorrect spelled your image wrong.

PORKY'S MOVING DAY is infinitely superior.

KILL THE WABBIT
KILL THE WABBIT
TOHOHOOO-OH

File: DuckAmuck.jpg (28 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]

28 KB, 640x480

You're all wrong

>>78398186
this. Rabbit of Seville is a close (but not that close) #2

>>78397922
No, not even close.

File: image.jpg (268 KB, 640x359) Image search: [Google]

268 KB, 640x359

Just re-watched some of Chuck Jones's Bugs Bunny cartoons made for TV, and oh my God...they're utter shit.

where's literally me guy when you need him

I like the Bob Clampett shorts better

File: Feed.the.Kitty.1952.720p.BluRay.x264-Codres.mkv_snapshot_01.07_[2014.01.11_18.07.31].jpg (70 KB, 960x720) Image search: [Google]

70 KB, 960x720

>>78397967

>>78397922
Correct.

>>78398186
Overrated.

>>78398691
Bugs is a troll

>>78399836
you talking about those movies/specials they made where they spliced together like a dozen shorts using various framing devices?

File: 1450957551945.jpg (123 KB, 914x1280) Image search: [Google]

123 KB, 914x1280

>>78401141
No, look up Bugs Bunny in king Arthur's court. It's horrid. Looks like Chuck couldn't make decent cartoons without the people who he used to work with at WB.

Chuck couldn't make anything work without that crew. Everything he did was awful. Even some of the fifties Looney Tunes were pretty bad.

I'm putting my vote in for A Wild Hare.

I can't this entire god damn cartoon from memory, but I can't add fractions.

>>78398186
Always the best.

I prefer shorts where Bugs loses.

File: RabbitFire.jpg (45 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]

45 KB, 640x480

>>78397922

File: 1450977502665.jpg (118 KB, 450x300) Image search: [Google]

118 KB, 450x300

Is "a Looney Tunes Christmas" any good?

>>78404368
oh fuck no, even the LTS christmas episode is better

>>78399836
did you ever see the webtoons

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP-R8XqNDds

>>78404622
Alright then.

>>78402697

^This.

Chuck Jones was a good director, but an even better credit hog and self promoter. Those unfunny and poorly-timed Tom and Jerry cartoons of his convinced me all the rumors were true. I'd put both McKimsons and Clampett above him.

File: image.jpg (1 MB, 1440x2125) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1440x2125

I'm so glad the comics were based on McKimson's Bugs.

http://www.toon.is/bugs-bunny-whats-opera-doc-video_5fc2b5ea1.html

>>78406585
All the Jones cartoons mentioned in this thread were written by Michael Maltese, that guy deserves some credit too

>>78407175
Don't forget about Warren Foster

>>78407175

Absolutely. While we're at it, how great was Carl Stalling's music. Even as a lad, whenever I saw Bill Lava's name in the credits, I knew it was going to be one of the shitty Looney Tunes shorts.

File: 1450992634706.png (538 KB, 673x517) Image search: [Google]

538 KB, 673x517

Has anyone else noticed that sometimes Bugs seduces guys without dressing as a woman? What's up with that.

>>78408739
>What's up with that
he's a huge gay that's what's up

File: Daffy's Bizarre Adventure.jpg (27 KB, 318x307) Image search: [Google]

27 KB, 318x307

>>78397922

File: 1450993182110.png (373 KB, 557x459) Image search: [Google]

373 KB, 557x459

>>78408852
Yeah, that's what I thought.

File: larriva1-2.jpg (17 KB, 312x228) Image search: [Google]

17 KB, 312x228

>>78407401
I wonder: are there any people in existence who like the Rudy Larriva version of these shorts?

I've even seen a few people who like the Deitch Tom & Jerrys, but everyone seems to unanimously hate 60s Looney tunes. Are they even worse (I never saw much of them as a kid)?

>>78408739
Rabbit ass is tappable with or without a dress.

>>78408866
literally me

>>78408852
I miss flamboyant Bugs. LTS and Wabbit Bugs is boring as hell.

File: latest[1].jpg (22 KB, 400x307) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 400x307

we can all agree the 80s shorts sucked hard, right?

>>78410141

Box Office Bunny was decent.

File: image.png (153 KB, 452x290) Image search: [Google]

153 KB, 452x290

>>78410169
That's from the 90's like Blooper Bunny and Invasion of the Bunny snatchers.

Both of those were pretty good.

>>78410359

It was released in Jan 1990. It's essentially 80s.

>>78410359
>Invasion of the Bunny snatchers.
Lewd.

File: latest[4].gif (9 KB, 186x351) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 186x351

>>78408952
As a kid I always found the Deitch T&Js fascinating as it was like the duo were warped to some strange alternate universe with all the weird ass sound effects and 'strange' humor.

The latter era Looney Tunes always made me change the channel though. Especially if something like the Daffy versus Speedy shorts or this fucker showed up.

File: image.png (574 KB, 770x529) Image search: [Google]

574 KB, 770x529

>>78410454
No, it was spooky

>>78410387
fine

>>78404368
I thought it was okay, kinda trippy hearing Porky's daughter talk with the exact same voice as Sari Sumdac though

>>78410588
I feel sorry for this character... just completely born into the wrong time