>this image exists on the public Space Jam website.
Get it together WB
>>78338168
What's the problem exactly?
>>78338168
Isn't that site a literal time capsule of 20 years ago?
+1 respect for them
-1 respect for you
>>78338168
thought it said "Lola tits" for a second
>>78338168
>sexuality is a sin
>>78338168
... The problem?
>>78338168
>OP is scared of cleavage
>>78338290
>>78338179
Its a movie for kids not furries
>>78338168
what are you doing looking at lola sketches? FURRY!!
>>78338168
Is it just me or do I detect a hint of Lola's LTS personality in this drawing?
>>78338353
Looney Tunes has always had a cheeky streak of sexual innuendo going back to the 40s.
At least one person responsible for Lola masturbated furiously to Bugs as a kid. She was their bid to prove they weren't a gay furry.
Enough with the "it's furry!" shit.
It's a fucking kids movie.
>>78338353
>its a movie for kids!
>Therefore, storyboard artist, whose works never leave the studios, should bother to draw safe to look at art even if I'm never going to be personally affected by it but THINK OF THE CHILDRENS
>>78338353
>>78338514
>lets draw tits on a girl rabbit and feature lots of ass shots
>its just a kids movie
pick one
>>78339401
the tits are for the adults, duh
has there ever been a succesful kids movie for kids only? fuck no
>>78339401
Why would you want to put tits on a rabbit anyway? That's disgusting. Fucking furfags.
reminder that proto-Lola is best Lola
>>78340465
Those shorts look like they'd hurt. Like, massive front-wedgie.
>>78340526
which is what's attractive about them
>>78338353
Thanks for the input, captain autismo.
>>78340465
There are many proto-Lolas.
>>78340465
so urban
>>78338179
Improper use of the term "evolve"
>>78340594
I'm 100% sure top left is just Bugs
>>78340828
>Bugs
>With those hips
>>78340828
Well that's how the main girl rabbit before Lola looked like, a female Bugs Bunny.
>>78338168
What does it fucking say?
>>78341203
*Lola tilts bucket back*
"Evolve!" she says
>>78341322
Thanks
>>78338353
there was a time when anthropomorpfic animal were for fun and jokes, even sexy jokes, and not for sexual perversion
>>78341579
That's not true and you know it.
>>78340526
She is into bondage.
>>78341618
I knew the world before the internet so I know that it's true.
furfags have been so obnoxious and loud that now we associate any depiction of anthro animals with furryshit
>>78341728
>we associate any depiction of anthro animals with furryshit
So you started to think like furfags instead of how you used to think. You let them change you.
Interesting.
>>78341579
>>78341728
the only purpose of Lola was to market the movie to furries, that's literally why she exists, so guys would find her hot, no matter their age
>>78341891
>the only purpose of Lola was to market the movie to furries.
Okay, that's just dumb. I think Bugs in a drag is much cuter than Lola.
>>78341915
dumb? really? well then explain to me why they put her in the movie
>>78341891
True, every company in 1996 wanted a chunk of that massive furry demographic's money.
>>78341951
Obligatory love interest for Bugs. Also her design is loosely based on Robert McKimson's honey Bunny.
>>78341951
Because girl power was a huge thing at the time. You may be too young to remember.
>>78338179
the girl rabbit has boobies
>>78341997
It's still a huge thing.
>>78341997
>1997
nice post number
>>78341873
no, but you can't mention anthro cartoons without someone associating them with furries.
Like in this thread
>>78341891
no, you see. Furfagss specifically like a character because it's a furry.
Giving an anthro cartoon the traits o an attractive woman doesn't mean they're trying to appeal to furfags.
it's for fun, and for what this anon says>>78341987
>>78345188
what is this shit? of course furfags like attractive furries?? even they have standards
>>78340594
damn
>>78340594
>That sitting Lola
cute
>>78345347
Must not be that high
