Is this any good?
No.
Disregard all posts below this one.
>>78105213
The first season took itself too seriously, but it gets better over timeAlthough the 3rd season opening is awful
does this really exist? who thought this was a good idea?
>>78105296
It has 3 seasons??
>>78105332
No it doesn't. I fucked up
No, it's utter shit.
>>78105213
At the least, it's better than people give it credit for. It was basically Legion of Superheros but with Looney Tunes. Didn't really have many noteworthy villains, but it was alright in humor and action.
>>78105231
>>78105332
>does this really exist? who thought this was a good idea?
After Back in Action flopped, WB thought Looney Tunes weren't relevant anymore. So they made Loonatics in the hopes of making them more "hip".
Turns out Back in Action only flopped because it was a terrible movie, not because Looney Tunes weren't relevant. So Loonatics was pointless and no one wanted it.
>>78105518
>-it was a terrible movie
>>78105213
Nothing spectacular, but not near as bad as everyone bitches about
>>78105231
If it was made 5 years earlier it might have had a chance.
>>78105213
No. But here's the thing . . . if this program were made today, kids would more than likely go nuts for it.
>>78105213
I liked it.
What up, BITCH!
>tfw I actually like edgy remakes
Sometimes a universe needs a dose of drama and actual plot.
>>78107536
I think even /co/ would go nuts about it, since it'd probably be one of the only action cartoons airing, and it'd almost be a breath of fresh air instead of one of many.
It wasn't actually a bad IDEA, but combination of
1) FUGLY 1980s-Real-Ghostbusters-style character designs and
2) superserious first-season storytelling approach
really, REALLY hurt it.
>>78105213
2nd season is okay. Skim the first to get the gist of the plot, imo. I don't think it ever really reached 'good', but it's not bad overall for what it was trying to be.
