Daredevil for both questions

>>77765628
Jessica Jones.

It's realistic, and good.

Daredevil is too campy, and far too ridiculous to even bother watch.

It's a joke.

It's like someone slapped a daredevil costume on Spider-Man. It's really hard to tell it's even Matt Murdock under that crappy costume.

>>77765676
>a comic book show
>campy

You don't say?

>>77765676
Nothing wrong with campy.

>>77765676
>It's like someone slapped a daredevil costume on Spider-Man. It's really hard to tell it's even Matt Murdock under that crappy costume.
I quite honestly don't know what you mean by this
His fighting style it much more street level and he doesn't make any punchlines. He doesn't go swinging around on a grappling hook or anything like Spider-Man would.

>>77765628
They're both good.

I'd watch Daredevil first because it is chronologically first. Not that there's much connecting the two series, but it's as good a place to start as any.

>>77766208
>They're both good.
Kek

>>77765628
Nigger why would you pay for Netflix when the entire series has been online for free for months

I liked Jessica Jones more I think, but both were really good.

Jessica Jones takes place after Daredevil so I recommend watching DD first, but really it doesn't matter.

You may as well watch Daredevil first because it takes place before JJ and there are light references to Daredevil in JJ

Watch Luther and quit being a faggot.

>>77765628
Daredevil. Jessica Jones is pretty mediocre in comparison. (Unless you want to work backwards)

>>77765628
At first i thought Daredevil , but Jessica Jones really gets better as it goes , which is the opposite of Daredevil

The one with Michael Jackson