>we live in a world where Mickey is currently funnier than looney tunes
>we live in a world where fucking Scooby doo is funnier than looney tunes
What happened?
>>77653273
comedy ain't funny anymore
Comedy is subjective.
>>77653273
>Mickey
>that Gene Deitch show
heh nah
>>77653273
>mfw people think Wabbit is better than LTS
>>77653417
the only ones I've seen say that so far are those who are like "but both are still shit though"
>>77653273
Needs more Daffy
>>77653572
Has he been in it at all yet?
you have to pick one
>>77653273
Bugs bunny reboots =/= looney tunes.
Looney tunes is still funnier than a majority of cartoons that exist.
How come LTS had to switch the characters back to normal from the great redesigns they got halfway through, then Wabbit comes in with completely fuck awful redesigns?
>>77653975
LTS designs got changed because people bitched that they didn't look like the originals: "the originals" being how they were drawn in Space Jam and similar merchandise/shows of the '90s. Seriously, people seem to forget that the Looney Tunes have been drawn differently all the time over the years, the look of one decade or artist isn't going to exactly match another, etc. Even though the same audience that complained about those designs didn't seem to like or watch the show, it seems the crew bent over backwards and redesigned everyone to appease them anyway.
Guess Wabbit is trying to do its own thing too, but with a less competent/stylized interpretation if the characters.
Still pisses me off that the woman who did the original LTS designs was literally called a cunt by multiple bitter Looney Tunes fans for attempting to try something new.
>>77653273
Because its not Looney Tunes. Looney Tunes has anvils, people getting blown up and shot at.
The new Looney Tunes shows have none of those things that made it famous and thanks to the politically correct age we live in that'll never happen.
>>77653683
>Kath Soucie
no further questions
>>77653975
The longer I look at it, the more I laugh. Not because it's funny because of its own merit, but because of how absurd and shitty the designs are. Foghorn's head is one color away from being a kkk hood.
>>77655061
Both?
>>77654150
>>77653975
The designs of LTS were fine, its the writing and drirection that were the problem.
Also, looking into the woman's art and honestly, I like what I am seeing so far.jessicaborutskiDOTblogspotDOTcom
>Name a show "Wabbit" after Elmer Fudd's classic mispronunciation
>Elmer Fudd isn't even in the fucking show at all
What the hell, yo? Probably because he carries a gun and liberal assfuckers think that's the worst thing in the universe, besides capitalism and free speech.
>>77653273
Micky Mouse Youtube Shorts > Wabbit >>>>>>>>>> That new Scooby Doo show
>>77656529
I'd say Wabbit and Be Cool are equal in shittiness.
Or maybe Be Cool has the advantage, because at least it doesn't have a character as fucking awful as Big Foot.
>>77653572
>take away what made Bugs so funny
>give him a small squirrel that brings nothing to the show
>have him deal with a angry cowboy more than anything else
>>77653403
You can say that about most things
>>77653683
Aaah but would you do her old concept design?
>>77653683
>>77653273
Because they are trying to make a loony tunes cartoon that doesn't offend anybody, and this is the unfortunate result a banal disappointment.
This is what you get when you demand political correctness from comedy, boring loony tunes.
>that horrible font in the title
>Bugs being nothing but an annoyed downer
>that hideous bigfoot design
>a fucking mute squirrel as sidekick
>yosemite sam in every second episode but no elmer ever
how can you put this many bad decisions in one show?
>>77657438
What was with the bigfoot character anyways? Why couldn't they just use Hugo?
>>77653273
The looney tunes show was something, but this is just horrible.
>>77653683
The prototype version of the fox.
>>77657198
This design was perfect. Why did they change it?
>>77659672
More goofy less sexy
