Spider-Man would be the ideal character for a TV show on the CW now that they're all about superheroes
>Lighthearted tones
>Attractive teenagers in multiple romantic entanglements in a high school setting
>Highly serialized storytelling
>Wide variety of villains available
>Doesn't require that much CGI
Too bad he's too much of a drawn to ever get a show anywhere.
CW is DCTV
>>77483457
That's bedside the point, I'm talking about THEEEMES, man.
>>77483356
They made a show about Superman that lasted for ten seasons and currently have a show about Batman.
I don't see anyone as being off the table.
It would be on ABC, not CW though.
The problem is Marvel refuse to make anything that isn't part of the MCU and they won't waste Spider-Man on TV.
>>77483457
>>77483356
CW is Warner Brothers
>>77483356
If only CW didn't produce shit shows
Which is why Spectacular Spider-Man should have kept on going.
If it was live action, it would be the same few sets, and fights less than 2 minutes cause budget.
>>77483667
But it's not about Batman at all.
>>77484625
and spider-man would have just fought by punching while standing on the ground, like any generic strong schmuck
Spiderman is in a really weird place where his stpries are strictly street level, but his powers are bug budget.
Heck, I'd say even Ghost Rider would work better.
>>77485289
Some anon even did a pilot script for Ghost Rider like a month ago
>>77485289
>>77485360
Found it
http://pastebin.com/ePAGMi80
>>77485289
>implying spider-man has high budget
>thinks a CGI character with 80% CGI villains would be better suited for TV
jesus christ
>>77483356
fuck no CW shows are cheesy as fuck, they're cringeworthy and embarrassing to watch.
