>You will never ever see the first preview pics of the first Iron Man movies for the first time ever again.
>>77398139
God, I remember being so excited for this. Then the Avengers tease at the end made me so giddy.
Now it just feels wasted.
I wasn't excited for anything until about Iron Man 2. That's when it started looking like the shared universe plan wasn't actually bullshit. To be q honest, familia, the shared universe is what makes these films so good. Guardians can stand on its own in glory but overall, the universe is what does it.
>>77398220
>Then the Avengers tease at the end made me so giddy.
>Now it just feels wasted.
I'm not sure if you've been following Marvel Studios lately but there have already been two Avengers films.
TONY STARK BUILT THIS. IN A CAVE. WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS
i wish i could watch them all over again for the first time desu senpai
>>77398249
Pretty sure he's saying those movies sucked.
>>77398249
I think you have a problem processing information. Maybe try going to bed.
I wish I could un-watch the Thors and IM 2-3.
>>77398139
This movie is largely what got me into big two comics, I was mostly going to the 'adult graphic novel' section of my library before and getting weird stuff. But this got me into Marvel and DC, whether that's good or bad....lately started getting all my comics from the library again so read far less Marvel and DC again
>>77398396
Yeah, w-well, I-I'm not Tony Stark [audible gulp]
>>77398619
>>77398608
>greatest shared universe since star trek
>every film with the exception of iron man 2 and ultron is better than the last
>not a critical or box office bomb in sight
How the FUCK is that wasted?
>>77398723
Maybe anon, just maybe, he didn't like most of the follow ups to Iron Man
>>77399020
So every movie after The Wrath of Khan was a waste? Cause Marvel had many good movies after Iron Man, maybe he didn't like any as much as Khan-er Iron Man, but many people thing there were better ones.
>>77399124
>shilling this hard
>>77399238
>hating things for being popular
Nice handlebar mustache.
>>77399238
uh, yeah, cause Winter Soldier wasn't a great thing to come from a shared universe, right?
It's funny, I had no intentions on seeing Iron Man until I saw Incredible Hulk and realized the films were connected.
What was comic con like that year?
>>77398723
never seen someone shill marvel this hard
>>77398723
>greatest shared universe since star trek
The greeks had a pretty good thing going actually. It's ok to enjoy schlock but don't pretend it's something it's not.
>>77399238
>>77399020
>>77398619
>>77398608
>>77398220
>>77398723
>Thor 2 was better than Thor
nigga what?
>>77402747
DC really needs to pick up the pace.
This trend doesn't have long to go before it starts to crack.
>>77403000
Trips confirm, step it up DC. You too, can join Marvel in the sun. Or you can be the moon if that's your thing.
>>77402747
Can we get an update with the Netflix stuff and Ant-man's 80%
>>77401174
>defends his opinion
>gets called a shill
>>77398723
>>greatest shared universe since star trek
No?
>>77403299
Go on. Which claim are you trying to refute?
>>77403595
That one.
The MCU is in no way a good universe and the comparison to Star Trek is laughable considering that the Star Trek universe was built up from scratch without any clear goal in mind. They created a setting with numerous rich and complex characters and entire distinct cultures. The world that was created and the little restrictions imposed allowed them to do whatever kind of story they want with any kind of tone would best fit the author's vision.
MCU is over 80 percent action comedies and references with everybody being related to SHIELD or Hydra. This sucks ass as it is, but there's not even a fraction of the potential that Star Trek has for stories.
>>77403000
They don't want to put in the time or money that it would take to earn the money Marvel movies make.
That's why they're trying to introduce fucking everyone in one goddamn movie instead of building up to it.
It's going to fail spectacularly and it deserves to. I don't even read Marvel stuff and their cinematic universe is so much better it's not even funny.
>>77404183
>tripfag says MCU is shit
>>77402747
RT gives all the MCU movies a good score and gives all of ONE DCEU movie a bad score
Gee wiz I wonder who's opinion is gonna have more face value?
>>77398139
This is the first time I saw the promo pics.
>>77405284
Wow! You refuted my post with RT scores! Great job! I'm glad you explained how the MCU is a good universe for telling stories!
>>77398723
You must be underage, or simply have a serious case of bad taste.
>>77399584
The fact that any Marvelfag only gives WS and Daredevil as example of the "amazing" universe the MCU is, is an indicator of how shitty it is. And not because they're bad, but because those 2 are the only redeemable things in this mess.
>>77402747
It's funny, because all those Marvel movies are generic and blockbuster territory, too. If RT people weren't as biased as they are, those scores would be the same as MOS.
>>77406095
>>77406095
You're just pissed because your opinion doesn't mean shit. I don't gotta refute a sperg who needs to have a name on an anonymous image board.
>notice me senpai my opinion holds more weight than RTs!!!1!
>>77406308
RT is unbiased by design.
>>77406244
Not that guy but the only meh films the MCU has produced is Iron Man 2 and Incredible Hulk and The Dark World.
Hell I would say Avengers and Winter Soldier sit on top of the genre and the Iron Man trilogy is better than Nolan's Batman trilogy (razor thin margins though). If based Russo's deliver though the Captain America trilogy will easily become the best capeshit trilogy.
>>77406308
>If RT people weren't as biased
It's an aggregator site you pleb.
DKucks are really this stupid.
>>77398139
I was just talking about how hyped I got over seeing a glimpse of Cap's shield in Iron Man 1. That seems like so long ago
>>77402904
It was though.
But its not like it really matters either way when they're both still pieces of shit.
>>77406389
>It was though.
No it wasn't. Much better cinematography tho.
>>77406364
And the reviews are done magically? There are people doing it. Probably not RT per se, but the people doing the reviews in other sources are biased as fuck.
And, if you think for a second, that any Thor movie is better than MOS, then you must be really really retarded.
>>77406404
It was actually.
Thor is legitimately the worst Marvel movie, with Thor 2 is as a close second.
>>77406430
I'd argue that Iron Man 2 was worse. That film was all over the place.
>>77406326
>being pissed at what an equally worthless stranger with an equally worthless opinion who enjoys cape movies and partakes in company wars
Coo desu
TDK was the sweet spot as far as trying to take comic movies in a serious direction and all subsequent efforts to push the envelope have been hilarious failures.
The biggest reason people don't like TDKR or MoS isn't just that they're bad, as the poeple obsessed with comparing them to the relatively bad MCU movies get uptight over. It's that they overreach and insult your intelligence. If Thor thought it was cinematic brilliance rather than pulp trash people would probably hate it more too.
>>77406522
>being pissed
You have implied too much from my posts tripfag
>>77406422
>that any Thor movie is better than MOS, then you must be really really retarded.
Both Thor's are better than MoS.
Better pacing.
Better direction.
Better lead performances.
Better casting.
Better performances from the rest of the cast.
Better dialog.
Thor 1 had a much better villain.
More create action set pieces.
More fleshed out/relatable/interesting hero character.
Better Story (especially the first Thor)
Re-watchable.
.
.And for me personally the introduction of Hawkeye.
>>77399584
Having a shared universe is fine, but universes can be expansive and wide. What made Daredevil so good was how unrestrained it was. It fit neatly into existing chronology and didn't upset anything filmwise, and in being unrestrained in that way it pursued a different tone and direction.
Despite being within the same universe Marvel and DC can approach wildly different styles and tones. You can have a universe where there are gods, monsters, magic, science, and Section 8 in the fucking comics. But the Marvel Cinematic Universe has one tone and one flavor. Maybe we want a faithful adaptation of the story, not an assimilation through the MCU lens.
>>77406765
>More create*
*Creative
So will DC try to make people care about something like a talking raccoon, a tree that says 3 words, and a fucking ant?
>>77406795
Marvel has done more to diversify their films tone that either Fox, Sony or wb/dc.
From:
Idealized 1940's romp with a dash a propaganda.
To Sci Fi/Fugitive monster smash hybrid.
To tech sci fi action comedy with war profiteering, terrorists controlling suicide bombing narratives underneath.
To fish out of water fantasy.
To Three Days of the Condor inspired action political thriller (seriously bravo Marvel) which is an amazing marker of how America was(is) at the time.
To a modern Buckaroo Banzai space Opera.
To a small story about fathers and their daughters.
To massive team-up blowout, combining story threads from several other films into 1.
And there is more diversity to come
Where as Fox(X-men) has been doing the same plot for 15 years, lets not even talk about their F4 fare.
And WB is looking to, once again, Ape Nolan for BvS and SS after they already misused it in MoS.
>>77407084
Even tougher: They're going to try to make people care about Aquaman.
>>77404950
It's only been one movie, dawg.
>>77407252
If they make that serious it's going to blow up in their face.
>DC/Marvel console war fags
>Not reading based Valiant and looking forward to their introduction into mainstream
>>77407252
Ah, so they'll make a fish or something.
>>77398723
>every film with the exception of iron man 2 and ultron is better than the last
Whoa momma I don't think I ain't ever seen a post of quite this level of implication before in all my days
>>77407252
Aquaman will live or die on their concept of how they live underwater.
If it's an atmospheric dome it will fail.... Hard.
>capefags still get triggered by people not liking the Avengers
>>77407220
>To a small story about fathers and their daughters.
I don't recognize this one.
>>77407414
Pretty sure he means Ant-man.
>>77407371
Will be a pain to film underwater then cg the entire scenery I imagine.
>>77398139
Yes experiences are finite, and time moves on. Mature people accept this and can find other things to enjoywhile being able to look back on the things they enjoyed in the past reasonably and rationally.
It's unfortunate that shitty manchildren such as yourself are incapable of grasping this.
>>77407492
>experiences are finite and time moves on
Good, cause it would be awful to have to relive the first time I read your post.
>>77407463
Get creative. They are already behind the eight-ball with actually making an Aquaman movie, if that thing does not look conceptually unique it's DOA because the lead they picked damn sure isn't going to save it. Similar situation with Wonder Woman except there have been A LOT of Hollywood Swords and Sandals films.
>>77398396
I remember that meme even leaked and persisted on /b/
>>77398139
It wouldn't be a novel experience if we did.
I think for me a close second was when they first released the concept art for Guardians. I just couldn't believe that in my lifetime I'd be treated to such a thing.
If ever they announce Agents of Atlas these feels will return.
>>77407220
i miss kid goku dragon ball so much
>>77407252
they wont.their aquaman looks like 90'a hardcore fishman
>>77406308
>being this mad
>>77402747
>Celery Man has the same score as IM3
it should be 87 at least
>>77406422
>Everyone is biased, all these professional critics are paid shills, only MY taste counts!
>>77398139
>mfw I remember watching the teaser trailer on my grandma's old shitbox computer on YouTube in like 360p and freaking out when the Black Sabbath kicked in
>mfw me and my friend left the theater before the Nick Fury scene
>mfw we were both super into Marvel Ultimate Alliance at the time and I remember calling him up and freaking out after watching a shitty camrip of the credits online
>>77399124
>so every movie after wrath of khan was a waste?
Yeah.
>>77398723
>Implying Thor, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Avengers, Iron Man 3, Thor 2, or Age of Ultron are better than Iron Man 1
>Implying Winter Soldier wasn't the best film of Phase 2
Anon, I love the MCU too, but it's far from a perfect series.
>8 years ago
Fuck I was still in High School and now I've been working full time for almost two years
>capeshit
WEW LADS
>>77406765
>Both Thor's are better than MoS.
Just stop. They're both catwoman tier. Well the first one is, never seen Thor 2 and never plan on it.
>>77398139
Joke's on you OP! Just this morning I found out I've been diagnosed with anterograde amnesia, so I'm set for life.
>>77413341
They're both far superior to Catwoman. Hell, they're even better than Steel, and Steel is a far superior movie to Catwoman. Steel is at least fun.
Can't comment about Man of Steel because like you I've been warned off by bad experiences with prior movies, but there you go.
>>77413341
Thor 2 is a special level of failure. Especially with the mishandling of Eccleston.
The Flash show is where the hype is at now. Listening to Barrie talk about hunting down and stopping a speedster from another universe was happiness inducing.
>>77404950
Relax, homie. They put out one movie so far and if you think BVS will fail you're living in a dream world.
>>77414473
I'd think it's more like it won't be particularly well reviewed, they do however have enough name recognition to bring in plenty of people just to see how they did.
Thing is they had to salvage the cinematic universe from a film they hadn't planned on including and not from another one that they did as I recall. Have they decided on John Stewart of Hal Jordan for Green Lantern this time around I wonder?
