>Wow. What a crazy couple of days it has been. My parody cover sketch of Spider-Gwen aping the infamous Manara Spider-Woman pose sent some of the hypersensitive people in a tizzy.
>To be honest, I was amused and surprised by the uproar since it was, in my opinion, over nothing. It’s essentially a small group of angry and humorless people ranting against my DRAWING of a pretty woman. It’s utter nonsense. This world would be a better and a happier place if some people just grow a sense of humor and relax.
>Now, I’m getting bombarded by various bloggers asking for an interview addressing this “scandal”. Instead of me wasting my breath and precious time over this non-issue replying to all the interviewers, I’ve drawn another cover sketch in response which will, hopefully, answer all the questions.
>Enjoy, everyone.
>– –
>FRANK CHO
Pretty based of him.
Now that's a funny take on it
>>71048434
Fucking hilarious.
>>71048434
This is why i love cho
>>71048434
BASED CHO
A
S
E
D
C
H
O
>>71048434
10/10, keep at it Cho
Shhh no words.
Only dreams.
>>71048434
Based Cho.
>>71048434
NO FUCKS
O
F
U
C
K
S
>>71048434
Okay, what are some of the best comic Cho's worked on? I need to have something by someone this based on my shelf?
BASED
ASED
SED
E
D
>>71048562
this
>>71048562
Shanna the She-Devil.
>>71048562
Liberty Meadows
>>71048434
Kek. Good ol' cho.
>>71048562
Red Sonja:Queen of the Frozen Wastes.
>>71048434
>people were thinking he was going to apologize
>>71048434
>my DRAWING of a pretty woman
Kind of an oxymoron with comic book artists
BASED CHO
CAN'T BLASTER THE BUTTMASTER
HATERS BTFO
i'm glad he doesn't want to waste any time on it. good response.
now if only everyone else would stop wasting their own time...
>>71048434
I clapped so hard at this, I became American.
can't stow the cho
>>71048434
HA HA HA HA HA
on one hand i want to hate Cho because of his retarded stance on Superman.
on the other hand he does based as fuck shit like this.
It would have been better if he had released it without commenting. That makes him sound like a bitch.
>>71048562
He has a new book out today. Jungle Girl Season 3. It's a full comic of nearly nude bitches and dinosaurs eating people.
>>71048761
>That makes him sound like a bitch.
In what way?
>>71048790
Why they all gotta be bitches tho
>>71048790
Aw shit new Jungle Girl? Some good shit.
>>71048434
Damn son
10/10
#rekt
>>71048792
The cutesy tone is what ruins it and makes him sound like he's taking it just as seriously as the people he's attempting to rile up. It's terrible. The image itself says what he's trying to say in a less stupid way.
>>71048848
ounds to me like you're taking it too seriously.
>>71048434
>Mister J
>Not Mistah J
Into the trash it goes
>>71048434
Shit, he also managed to make an amusing joke out of it. This is breaking all sorts of records.
>>71048748
> muting randoms on Twitter with a verified account
> telling people you've muted them
Just gotta get the last word in, eh Slott?
>>71048880
I just really hate that "look at me, I'm so clever!" tone. Conversational posts are ok but this shit annoys me.
>>71048536
Book readers? REally?
>>71048434
Based fucking Cho
Fuck McKelvie and Rodriguez
Hasn't Harley not been with the Joker for decades now though?
>>71048434
This makes me angry as hell
Angry that Cho hasn't done the art in anything I regularly read aside from the occational badass cover.
>>71048751
No one's perfect.
>>71048434
Finally, someone who is willing to stand up to the insanity.
Hopefully this is the beginning of more artists just saying no when someone makes a big stink about their art and wants it censored or changed.
>>71048790
Thanks, I'll check it out once I finish Marvel's Oz series Liberty Meadows also looks fun
Cheers guys
>>71048917
Have you tried chilling the fuck out?
>>71048933
>decades
Let us now wait for tumblr to explode.
Because you know they will.
Never change, Cho.
ABSOLUTELY BASED.jpg
>bloggers
I wonder who contacted him. Also I want to commission him for art, but he only does con commissions, right?
I might just buy one of his books. I always liked his art,
>>71048974
I am chill, I'm just critiquing the post. What else is there to discuss anyway other than the delivery since we all agree that he's right?
>>71048917
I really hate that contrarian tone in your post.
And the words in it.
And you.
>>71048434
Based Cho. Take that tumblr
>>71049015
Mary Sue said they asked him for comment.
>>71048988
tumblr don't care, this is a twitter storm
>>71048434
>tfw the usual TheMarySue commenters are clutching their pearls
I'd be shocked if these people actually read manga
Can /co/ commission a bunch of cripple variants or something? I want to see sexy neck broken Gwen, sexy bullet wounded Babs...
>>71048918
That comment was enough trigger for a free mod to warrant a ban, tumblr has really taken over /co/
>>71049015
>I wonder who contacted him.
The Mary Sue, I imagine
Though same here, I've often seen his art posted on /co/ and he's real good. I've just always had always series I was catching up with; after this I've got not excuse not to read a comic he drew
>>71048434
Based, simply based.
>>71049080
Sexy refrigerator?
I do wish Cho would've actually debated or talked with someone about this in an open forum instead of just this cover
PARKER!
I need screenshots!
TWITTER SCREENSHOTS!
>>71049094
More like it was just a garbage comment. If you want to act like you're in /v/, go to /v/. This is /co/.
>>71049132
i dont think Cho's really the debating type
he gives zero fucks
I'm glad to see the whiners aren't getting him down. It's such a silly thing to complain about that this is the only kind of response that they deserve. They're obviously going to scream even louder over this, but it'll probably fall on deaf ears now.
>>71049134
On it boss man
>>71049132
He did. Except he went full blown nuclear with his first response
>>71048966
>tfw Robbie Rodriguez and Jaime McKelvie are with the SJW.
Like... actively commenting on these pics.
>>71049132
SJWs don't want actual debates they just want to scream until the other side gives up.
>>71049078
>it shows a clear disregard for the perfectly valid outrage over Manara's original Spider-Woman variant
>perfectly valid outrage
>>71049132
Why, there's no reason. These people are impotent hysterics, there's no reason to engage them since their opinions are worthless. It's, as he said, a complete waste of time.
>>71048922
I know Rodriguez said some shit about Gwen being his daughter or whatever, but what did that cunt McKelvie say?
>>71049132
Why? He can draw what he wants. Marvel didn't even pay him for this, this was a sketch cover commission. It would suck if artists had to ask the thought police what is ok to draw before they were "allowed" to draw it.
>>71048434
If that's real then that's awesome. That is the appropriate response.
>>71049177
I haven't seen McKelvie's response, but Rodriguez' was pathetic.
>>71048434
Would any of the people who complained at least say "Well played, Cho"?
Is Cho the first major comic creator to take a stand against oversensitive SJW's? Everyone else either actively drinks the kool-aid or buries their head in the sand.
>>71049132
Dude the designer of the costume threatened him.
Like his whole point is that people are making a controversy out of nothing, why would he go to a debate that is legitimizing a conflict he thinks does not need to exist?
>>71048434
Our new lord and master - Cho!
>>71049180
Like you guys do...all the time. Just scream and scream and never do anything productive.
>>71049146
And you don't get paid for this
>>71049198
McKelvie retweeted some guy saying "This is shitty." As in "It's shitty he's doing this on purpose and it's uncalled for."
>https://twitter.com/DavidUzumeri/status/585095031918198784
>>71049078
>Reductive to the plight of women
>When he draws women empowered it's ok but not when they make them sexy
People read this garbage? For real?
>>71049177
It would have been better if it was Batgirl instead of Harley.
>>71049249
You know, /co/ is the only board you will see people legitimately defending tumblr types
>>71049228
>>71049198
>>71049251
Neither do you, champ. We're both posting in an anime imageboard in our own free time.
How can one man be so fucking based?
>>71048817
Yeah why call them that? I like hot half naked girls as much as the next person but you don't have to be crass about it.
>>71049237
>Frank Cho saved comics!
>>71048562
I honestly loved the issues he did with Bendis for Mighty Avengers.
That Ares fight against the Iron Man suits was pretty cool.
>>71048434
kek
Whiny bitches BTFO!
>>71049230
I doubt it.
>>71048434
Bless you, Cho.
>>71049241
>Dude the designer of the costume threatened him.
Elaborate.
>>71049180
This is really funny cause Cho is the one who didn't want a debate.
>>71049193
>>71049213
>>71049241
Why are they so enraged? Why is Cho so flippant? Why not try to discuss it with each other, especially with an opportunity like being asked for an interview? Go on it and defend yourself!
He says it's nothing but this kind of thing keeps happening....
>>71049078
>We will update as necessary
This gunna be gud
>>71049269
Maybe Batgirl is up next?
I can't wait for Robbies tweet.
>>71049284
I don't work here, i do go searching in threads to find stuff that offends me and banning them for that.
I don't envy the amount of shit Cho is going to catch for this. It's so much easier to just keep your trap shut and let the loudest side win.
>>71049283
Thanks. That's pretty whiny, but I think Rodriguez' response is sadder.
>>71049322
What debate? There is nothing to debate. He is an artist and he makes art. He does not and should never let some stupid little girl on twitter or tumblr strongarm him into not making whatever the hell he wants. Grow up
>>71049344
>one of my kids
Oh my god, what a faggot.
>>71048751
Cho's done some other stupid things aside from that, but yes, he is actually right in this case. This was a "controversy" that should never have been a controversy in the first place.
And I kind of expected him to do a response since I remembered that University2 comic he did in response to complainers.
>>71049263
One of their own commenters said that TMS is turning into Jezebel
>>71049322
Cho has nothing to gain by trying to defend himself to these people.
Frank Cho is my spirit animal.
>>71049344
>one of my kids
>I created Gwen Stacy
>>71048748
>>71048913
"Tag, Not-It Forever Whooo!"
>>71049322
>Why are they so enraged?
Benevolent sexism, paternalism.
>Why is Cho so flippant?
He likes drawing lewd women and has been his entire career. Anyone who doesn't like lewd women should follow other artists who cater more to their tastes.
>>71049285
I want to explore that ass and claim it in the name of the queen
>>71049344
nigga why the fuck are you giving your kids this kind of content to begin with
youre a fucking shitty parent if youre blaming your incompetence on others
Why is Cho so fucking based?
>>71049322
My guess is Cho doesn't want a debate because he's always had to deal with this for years going back all the way to the 90's.
>>71049361
>everyone assuming it's a girl
CISfreaks need to check their privilege.
That's a pretty based response. Cho should just claim racism if they throw it back on him.
I wonder if you can buy these sketch covers he is doing.
>>71049176
>look at the pic out of curiosity
>it's a pig shitting
literal
shit
taste
If I were Cho I wouldn't go on the internet for the next few days. The butthurt is going to be huge on this one.
Are these people actually surprised that Cho did this?
Had they never heard of Cho or seen any of his artwork prior to these two covers?
>>71049283
Uzumeri then blocked a woman after she said she liked Cho's art
>>71049344
>Your drawing
>>71049377
He designed the costume. It is a great costume.
>>71049322
Are you kidding? Why should he explain himself? There's nothing to say. It's SJWs' problem.
>>71049321
What's his face, Rodriguez I think the name is, said Cho disrespected his "child" and that Cho was "lucky we'll never be alone together".
>>71049322
Probably because it was a commission, pretty damn harmless by pin-up standards, and an interview in today's comic media market can only make Cho look bad. Like why does he have to go into a public forum to defend a private commission?
>>71049435
I doubt he gives a single hot fuck
>>71049413
He thinks that because he designed Spider-Gwen, he has the moral authority to decided how she is portrayed.
>>71049413
He's not giving the stuff to his kids. He considers Spider-Gwen to be his kid. He's a nutto.
>>71049435
>not marinating yourself in all that mad
Do you even know how to celebrate your victories?
>>71049344
>One of my kids
>Be lucky your never around me
We got a badass here guys. Watch out.
>>71049403
For some reason a lot of people are too dumb to realize that if you simply support the things you like there will be more of them because companies like money. And the things that don't sell will go away.
>>71049435
Are you kidding? He's probably enjoying this.If he were still writing Liberty Meadows he'd probably have Monkey Boy Cho make a comment about it, then follow it up with some T&A only to get blocked by his editors again
Dammit I miss Liberty Meadows
>>71049483
THE CONSEQUENCES WILL NEVER BE THE SAME!
>>71049314
My sides never asked for this
>>71049479
This.
That drawing was Cho's victory lap. He won.
>>71049468
What's this guy gonna do when spider-gwen gets handed off to someone else?
I really hope people start sending Spider-Gwen porn to Rodriguez.
>>71049452
I'm guessing most of the fashion designers also claim ownership of the women that wear their clothing then...
>>71049344
>Spider-Gwen as a young, flexible, spider-powered preteen girl, climbing on walls and posing on rooftops
I'm okay with this.
>>71049344
>your never around me
>>71049344
>your instead of you're
>not once, but twice in the same tweet
As a grammar Nazi I have been #triggered.
>>71049510
>>71049510
I almost want to see Spider-Gwen get knocked up by Norman Osborn again just to see all that mad.
>>71049322
I think they are so enraged because they view Spider-Gwen as a sacred object. Which is really funny consdiering the whole "Objectifying" thing they are complaining about here.
Cho's response is because of the nature of the piece. It's unofficail. It's not even a comission IIRC. It's just a picture. The response is to him (and to me) disproportionate to the act because of the sanctity of the subject. To the creator and readers, she is a symbol of unsexualized femininity which is emerging and . . . not much else. She's a good character, sure, but they gloss that over for the sanctity with their arguments.
So, the people who object to her objectificataion are objectifying the very thing they wish to protect, albiet in a different way. While the perpetrator doesn't see what the fuss is about.
Was it insensitive? Possibly. I can understand the reasoning behind it all, but I don't think the action is warranted.
Then again, I never found the Manara cover 'offensive' as a sexist statement, but it was just bad looking and skewed with it's overall shape.
>>71049514
This. He's retarded.
Like our lord of hip hop andliberated woman Taylor Swiftonce said, haters gonna hatehate hate hate hate hate.
>>71049322
>Why not try to discuss it with each other, especially with an opportunity like being asked for an interview? Go on it and defend yourself!
Well gee, maybe he figured out he's an artist, not a twitter shithead who's gonna be willing to sit through a rapid-fire twitter sermon, and anything he'd say is to be dismissed as mansplaining and mocking the plight of women in comics, making him an example and a prime cut of meat for a few rounds of clickbait.
Maybe if more people actually started ignoring and mocking the outrage brigade, they'd learn to live with that and we wouldn't have all these shitty threads.
>>71049521
As a gun, I have been #triggered by your post.
>>71049498
God forbid someone not go along with turning comic books into yet another hugbox for leftist SJW.s.
You know what really bugs me? There are these images which depict women in these poses. As they have been for decades. This isn't even sexual. I'm not sitting here beating to it. The guy is making a joke about a shit controversy that happened when it's probably Marvel's fault for HIRING A DUDE WHO REGULARLY DRAWS LEGIT EROTICA FOR A LIVING to do a cover for a character that has existed for years with a skin-tight suit. Not to mention Gwen, as a spider-person, is regularly doing spread eagles in mid air.
I don't even like Cho's art. I hate his noses. But he makes one fucking crack joke about a controversy and he's shit on from SJW. Meanwhile there have been comedians making fun of shit like the Holocaust and 9/11 and ISIS and countless other tragedies and HA HA IT'S SO FUCKING FUNNY I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT! People fucking DIED during that. You're telling me a woman bending over in JEST offends this many people?!?! How the FUCK do they even get out of bed in the morning?
>>71049536
i also love how nowadays if a woman is drawn sexily its automatically objectification.
that's not how that works.
>>71049509
It's so simple too, yet nearly every other artist is afraid of it
>>71049536
>she is a symbol of unsexualized femininity
I never got this. Okay she isn't as sexualised as some but you still she her butt and tats in a skin tight costume all the time
>>71049189
When someone says there is a valid outrage I start thinking, politician laundering money through a charity, drunk driver running over children on a playground and so on, not by his own admission in that article bitches feeling "discomfort" at looking at a sexy looking drawing.
If Cho really wants to piss the new age comic geeks. He should do something with the selfie loving Batgirl.
That would create some worthy keks
>>71049540
and just freaking creepy. You can't own an imaginary woman's sexuality, or a real one's for that matter.
>>71049344
What a fucking tool
He deserves the full brunt of derision and mockery that the internet is capable of.
>>71049358
But he felt strong enough to make another cover at them, this time intentionally with humor. Maybe I don't have enough of an artist mindset but it seems like a discussion would be an easier way to make a point. This seems aggressive and why is he aggressive? BTW I think this Quinn cover is a lot better.
>>71049425
>>71049403
These are good points
>>71049464
You're making me reassess my points, my hope was opening a debate would calm down this fire on all sides.
>>71049322
Good point too, Spider-Gwen is very different than an established figure. And that context is important/ interesting. It's another example of how fandom is expanding and including different groups
>>71049553
>Maybe if more people actually started ignoring and mocking the outrage brigade, they'd learn to live with that and we wouldn't have all these shitty threads.
That isn't how it works though, these people get their way when no one speaks up. These people can and do get shit changed now and them doing so is getting faster and faster
If we don't speak of they all companies will hear is them
>>71049078
isn't Gwen, like, in college or something?
>>71048434
>Instead of me wasting my breath and precious time over this non-issue replying to all the interviewers, I’ve drawn another cover sketch in response which will, hopefully, answer all the questions.
"I'm not going to respond except with this response which will obviously create a bigger controversy."
>>71049637
Nigga you think they looked past to cover to learn that?
>>71049623
Did you just reply to yourself, saying 'good point'?
>>71049361
weird. isn't TMS like way worse then Jezebel?
>>71049559
Maybe the offended and triggered haven't spent enough time in their safe space. Be nice.
>>71049638
Well, it's the funner route.
>>71049638
The response is clear.
"I don't give a fuck, and I'll continue to do what I'm doing." He would've got shit for SAYING that. So who cares.
>>71049637
She's old enough to drink at a bar.
>>71049555
BuCowKe
>>71049582
>bitches feeling "discomfort" at looking at a sexy looking drawing.
A lot of young, Americans get beat into their head that sexuality is badm'kay.
In a PG-13 movie, you can show a piece of rebar going through some mook's head, but the lead female can't take her top off.
There was a sex reassignment show on E or whatever, and when he was a guy, no blurs on nipples or whatever, and while they were showing part of the fucking surgery, at some point the nipples got blurred. It's fucking mental.
>>71049656
FUck me, I meant
>>71049536
about Spider-Gwen as sacred object
Pobody's Nerfect!
>>71049662
I honestly wouldn't mind hanging out in the Safe Space. Free cookies, a place to nap, and videos of puppies I can whack it to. Juvenile, yes, but you'd be a fool to pass up free cookies.
>>71049662
>Give college kids food and shit to play with
>Doesn't think a
everyone will take advantage of it
what an idiot
>>71049686
Dem feet
I want to sexualize this Gwen as she is in this comic.
>>71049344
If it's canon that's different but you don't see someone like Geoff Johns crying about sexy non-official pictures of Stargirl.
This is so dumb.
>>71049600
She should send out naked snapchats with her in her cowl or something.
>>71049435
just delete his twitter
they wont have an outlet to bitch at him if he doesnt have one
theyll have to resort into harassing him in a personal level which would be immoral and possibly illegal
The fantastic thing is that both times he actually drew it better than Manara. There's no incredibly broken neck, the arms and legs are bent in more natural ways for a person resting in that position, and the ass actually looks like it would from that angle. No inhumanly deep and sharp heart-shaped buttocks. Extra points for them wearing things that actually look like clothing, and not just body-paint.
If the original cover had looked more like these, there probably wouldn't have been any outrage whatsover. If he'd posted similar images as an "improvement" when the original outrage happened he'd probably have been applauded for it.
>>71049661
They're about level now. Jezebel in the past let it's feminist biases out in the open. They've culled it a bit recently. TMS is starting to ramp up the stupid.
>>71048434
Fucking based.
>>71049662
>"Hiding from Scary Ideas"
Do you think the Safe Space people realized the headline was mocking them? Or that people probably only came into the room for the free cookies?
>>71049628
Yes, you are right. And Cho did that in a way he found appriopriate, which is ignoring their bleating and mocking them at the same time. I think it's a much better way than to try entertaining their outrage only to be dogpiled on twitter, screencaped and posted by shit sites as an example of misogynist asshole, and on /co/ as a pretext to shitpost about SJWs.
Yeah, he's still probably going to be hailed as the comic book equivalent of Elliot Rodgers by these fucking paranoiacs, but at least he didn't waste time on talking to people who don't want to hear anything.
>>71049689
>There was a sex reassignment show on E or whatever, and when he was a guy, no blurs on nipples or whatever, and while they were showing part of the fucking surgery, at some point the nipples got blurred. It's fucking mental.
To be fair, nipples are actually more sexual on women. Guys feel nothing when they get their nipples touched but girls will enjoy it.
>>71049728
The original outrage wasn't because Manara is a shit artist but because of the pose in general.
>>71049662
Ok that picture makes my head hurt.
They are literally treating people like children and they think it's a good thing.
How the fuck?
>>71048434
KEK
fuck them all Cho !
>>71049728
>If the original cover had looked more like these, there probably wouldn't have been any outrage whatsover.
>People who read TMS wouldn't be outraged
That's the only thing they know
>>71049435
What can they actually do to him? Besides the usually death threats and stuff I mean.
I believe they call this the Top Gear method. Pissed off someone? Do it again, but do it bigger
>>71049664
>>71049672
yeah but now crazy MRA and Gamergaters are holding up Cho as "one of them" when in actuality, he's just not kowtowing to kneejerk internet bullshit.
>>71048434
We should get #WeSupportFrankCho trending to laugh even harder at this.
He's so damn based. Finally someone stands up to this retarded shit.
>>71049750
That's not true.
>>71049741
Is it true about the new male Ghostbusters movie? Because that legit sounds like a coward move. I get why people are mad.
>>71049750
>Guys feel nothing when they get their nipples touched but girls will enjoy it.
Not all men, seriously.
>>71049750
>Guys feel nothing when they get their nipples touched but girls will enjoy it.
I mean, I don't want to say you're wrong, but I like it when they play with my nips. Probably not as much as them, though.
>>71049613
>You can't own an imaginary woman's sexuality, or a real one's for that matter.
/thread
>>71049688
Moo-kake.
>>71049748
Shit, I would've gone for free cookies.
>>71049749
Well if that is true why haven't you helped curb the outrage all the other times with brilliant schemes?
The only reason this isn't more is there is nothing to be pulled
>>71049662
A physical hugbox? Fucking A, America. What's next?
>>71049774
>#Comicgate
No.
That's not happening.
>>71049775
They were always going to do that you know? #Change the cover hastags were showing up frequently already.
>>71049803
I'd probably have gone for a lot less than a free cookie.
YOu don't want to know the kind of shit I'd do for a Klondike bar.
all this fake outrage over Marvels version of bathipstergirl. Frank cho may be an ass but good fir him.
>>71049237
>Drown in hobo piss.
>>71049781
>>71049785
>>71049786
Just speaking from experience though. I just feel tickling, but girl love that shit.
>>71049741
>this image
You could drizzle this mad over pancakes. So thick and rich.
>>71049780
Turning this into a movement is what the tumblr types want because then they have a target beyond an artist simply doing what he does best.
>>71049623
Internet debates, especially through media outlets who have a vested interest in manufactured controversy, usually feed more fires than they calm down. If you want to chill out a situation do it in "person", in a skype convo or an instant message or even an old fashioned phone call. Something that forces you to actually talk to the person instead of shooting quick quips everyone else can publicly comment on in real time.
Ultimately the picture isn't the public's business because its not official Marvel artwork. It doesn't matter what we think because its something private that got posted online; we can complain all we want, but the artist has a right to draw what he wants as long as the copyright holders do not object and the consumer's recourse if offended is to not patron that artist anymore.
>>71049755
It started with that, but it was fuelled because of the impossibility of the pose. It's not like there's an outrage every time there's been someone posing like that, because the outraged need other things to critique, otherwise it dies down too fast.
>>71049783
The ghosbuster movie is gonna be male, there is not female version, though they might add a women to the male cast.
>>71049514
Which is way more sexist than a cheesecake commission. Quick! Someone with a twitter account accuse Rodriguez of trying to assert ownership over women.
>>71049783
Here's the deal, making an all-women ghostbusters movie with a bunch of horribly unfunny gargoyles is a losing move. People in Hollywood don't like losing. The winning move is to make a ghostbusters movie with a group of people who have chemistry and an appreciation for the original, which the male cast does
It's not cowardly, it's realizing that maybe that first thing was a mistake that no one would like outside of internet feminists looking for something to hold over peoples' heads shouting "This is ours now neener neener"
>>71049833
>That's not happening.
Not with that attitude.
>>71049774
>#Comicgate
Seriously faggots. I hate all those SJW too but you are just asking for an scandal here.
>>71049780
No. They will just hop on the tag and false flag. Right now they have no vectors to attack from and it is glorious.
>>71049344
This is Chris-Chan levels of autism.
"NO PLEASE DON'T DRAW ROSECHU WITH A PENIS NO"
>>71049888
It's still kinda ass for women who got excited by the original announcement though.
Honestly the better option was to have a mixed cast.
>>71049867
>It started with that, but it was fuelled because of the impossibility of the pose
It isn't impossible, so many cosplayers have copied it by now. They just use that as an excuse for any pose tehy don't like
The poses most superheroines are nothing compared to something like jojo
>>71049662
>that entire article
these bitches need play-doh when they hear opinions they don't like? that is insane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6TiRJNI-Q
>>71049836
Nigger I would kill you for a klondike bar
Not even fronting
>>71049914
masturbatin' and squirtin'
>>71048434
Thank you, Cho.
>>71049922
>It's still kinda ass for women who got excited by the original announcement though.
Those women are stupid. Is the only thing that can make them happy is reappropriation shit? Make your own and actually support others
>>71049922
Honestly, a 2 and 2 cast with no romantic subplots between the team would've been great. I just want to seem more male/female professional or just friendly relationships. Not everything has to turn romantic.
>>71049933
To be fair i would like some play-doh when listening to SJWs.
I could make little dinosaurs and fight them instead of listening to their stupid.
The word "based" has been used 18 times in this thread so far.
You guys should really stop being meme spouting machines and try to have an original thought for once.
>inb4 somoene accuses me of being a butthurt sjw because I'm tired of seeing useless posts that add nothing to the conversation.
>>71049922
Like I said, most of those women were only excited for it because it was taking something away from "da bois clurghb"
They didn't actually care about the movie and likely would not have gone to see it since they already got what they wanted with the destruction of a beloved property
>>71049961
I don't get why you are so buttblasted over this. I bet you got mad when Falcon became Cap.
>>71049662
You know, it's hard to put myself in their shoes...
but if I were a victim of sexual violence and I was upset by something I heard in that debate and some clueless ass escorted me to a room with Play-Doh, puppies and cookies, I'd probably feel patronized and insulted.
SJWs BTFO
BLOWN
THE
FUCK
OUT
>>71049662
I wonder, how those kind of people will do when they will have a job, when their boss will say something that will "trigger" them or a colleague will disagree with them ?
>>71049818
I have no fucking idea what are you trying to tell me and if you even quoted the right post tbh
>>71049974
>Not everything has to turn romantic.
God bless this anon. I'm sick of romance subplots.
>>71049977
>asking 4chan to stop being 4chan
/co/ isn't even half as bad with this compared to other boards, settle down
>>71049977
Man, you a straight busta.
Not based at all, Lil B would be ashamed.
>>71049899
Hm...Considering the gamergate scandal fucked over Kotaku & friends, perhaps this is for the best.
>>71049925
You'll have to have a really bendy neck to get your head that far up, man.
The rest was just... Implausible, as it's not a comfortable way to rest at all. Cho definitely drew them relaxed rather than contorted.
>>71049922
I thought they were making both?
Honestly if a new Ghostbusters comes out I want funny people involved, male or female.
>>71049938
That fucking awful music.
>>71049938
>publishing cover after cover after cover of women in provocative poses
This is probably my favorite point of this video.
>>71049344
Someone light the Rule 34 signal
This bitch nigga needs nudes of his babby
>>71049344
What a complete nunce
>>71049985
Storywise that was a fine development, supporting it just cause race is stupid though. People support that stuff cause they think they are being the saviour of womankind, really though we know any sequel like that will be crap. They'd have gone mad for the robocop reboot if it was a woman
>>71050046
>I want funny people involved
Then you will not be seeing the girlbusters, because jesus christ did they scrape the bottom of the barrel
Nothing but hambeast SNL rejects
>>71050028
Remember the time Lil B rapped over the Dilbert 3 song?
I didn't know what based was until I heard that masterpiece, and now my eyes have been opened by the Based One
>>71049977
did we trigger you anon?
>>71049783
The male Ghostbusters movie was announced as a smaller part of a larger announcement about the creation of an overall Ghostbusters universe.
This would be akin to if Marvel had announced "Captain Marvel", then announced the rest of Phase Three, but everybody only focused on "Black Panther".
>>71049894
Good. I don't want that bullshit there's enough of it in comics as it is and it'll only help to vilify anyone who doesn't like a ton of the bullshit changes going on already
>>71049899
I think that's literally what's happening, blogs have been trying to push for Comicgate for a bit, they tried it with Whor with the Batgirl cover, it never actually catches on but it's obvious they want a new gamergate and they want to be ontop when it breaks.
>>71050123
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzkCdBArO7o
dehumanize yourself and face to based god
>>71050156
Comicgate never takes off as no one really cares that much. unfortunately that means we are stuck in a cycle of shit
>>71050147
>overall Ghostbusters universe.
hollywood pls stop
you keep molesting me
