Spider-Man is back on the Marvel Payroll Thread #2
Footnotes and clarity:
>Under the deal, the new Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film from Marvel's Cinematic Universe (MCU). Sony Pictures will thereafter release the next installment of its $4 billion Spider-Man franchise, on July 28, 2017, in a film that will be co-produced by Kevin Feige and his expert team at Marvel and Amy Pascal, who oversaw the franchise launch for the studio 13 years ago. Together, they will collaborate on a new creative direction for the web slinger. Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films.
>Marvel and Sony Pictures are also exploring opportunities to integrate characters from the MCU into future Spider-Man films.
>As part of the revamp, the new Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film. The companies are not revealing details but that movie is likely to be Captain America: Civil War; the character was a major player in the comics storyline. Andrew Garfield is not expected to reprise the character.
>Four future instalments in the Marvel Cinematic Universe have received new release dates through 2019, including Thor’s next solo adventure as well as the first films for Black Panther, Captain Marvel and the Inhumans!
>Marvel’s “Thor: Ragnarok” will hit theaters November 3, 2017. The following year, Marvel’s “Black Panther” will make its way to theaters on July 6, 2018, and Marvel’s “Captain Marvel” on November 2, 2018. Finally, Marvel’s “Inhumans” will now debut in theaters July 12, 2019.
>The previously announced dates for Marvel’s “Avengers: Infinity War Part 1” and “Avengers: Infinity War Part 2” on May 4, 2018 and May 3, 2019, respectively, remain unchanged.
Sources:
http://marvel.com/news/movies/24062/sony_pictures_entertainment_brings_marvel_studios_into_the_amazing_world_of_spider-man
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/spider-man-swings-marvel-studios-772127
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-31356142
http://marvel.com/news/movies/24065/marvel_studios_schedules_new_release_dates_for_4_films#ixzz3RLP7HxPk
On twitter trending:
Spider-Man
Andrew Garfield
Marvel Cinematic Universe
Miles Morales
Peter Parker
Sony
>>69375414
most appropriate image for this topic
>Andrew Garfield is not expected to reprise the character.
Marvel Studios Fantastic Four when?
So since they're recasting again is this pretty much Miles confirmed?even though Miles is boring
>>69375446
Peter Parker was confirmed in the original press release from Marvel.
I'm getting scared at these dates
2019
jesus fucking christ we are inthe future
I'm not sure how I can take the year up going any further than 2015
I can't deal with this
Because of how its worded its sad to see the Civil war play out like it did in the comics but Gladly SPIDERMAN is coming back
>>69375414
Why should I be happy about this?
Amazing Spider-Man 2 wasn't that bad, and now that Marvel is getting Spidey back they're going to shove his 'new' movies in our face when they begin production.
Which will mean more people will read the current Spider-Man comics, meaning Dan Slott is on them for even longer. They'll also milk the shit out of him, and I just can't say I'm all too pleased with Spidey on Avengers. He works better solo.
What stopping them from making an AoU post-credits scene featuring spiderman?
No J.K. Simmons no party
>>69375446
I disagree, I would love to see a Miles Morales adapted from the comics. About as interesting as current Amazing anyway. Fuck Spider-Verse was much worse than current Miles.
Miles isn't perfect but it's the best comic Spider-Man currently being printed.
It's going to beJack O'Conell
>>69375455
Yep. Starting to think they may need to do 5 or 6 movies a year just to keep these dates from being so FAR
>>69375466
Nothing
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN YOU READ SPIDEY IN MCU CONFIRMED? INITIAL REACTIONS?
>>69375414
>spiderman in civil war
I cant wait for spiderman to beat the living shit out of kingpin
>>69375453
Black Peter Parker?
>>69375471
Dude, we are celebrating. Git out
>>69375470
>Spider-Verse
>Worse than current Miles
Nigga you high.
Spider-verse gave Miles actual personality.
>>69375414
>Miles Morales
>trending
How does it feel to be so delusional?
>>69375414
>>69375234
>>69375246
Best Spidey after-credit tease is actually not showing Spidey, but some JJJ scene about how all that happened in AoU was the fault of this new MASKED MENACE!>PARKER! GET ME PICUTRES OF SPIDER-MAN!
It'll be fun to see the how people will try and defend the ASM movies now, especially 2.
Expect 300% more "Well sure it was a clusterfuck with no plot, no actual villain central to the story and no character arc with tonal whiplash so bad it could snap Gwen Stacy's neck, but at least it's not an MCU movie!"
Also something something interesting failure over bland MCU something something.
>>69375446
Charlie Day as Peter Parker
Kind of hoping it's Miles.
>>69375455
We're in the future and I don't feel as old as I thought I would. Not bad
>>69375446
>Miles confirmed?
Why would they use a knock-off when they've finally got the real thing? It would be like them starting off Captain America with John Walker
>tfw Maguire and Garfield fused together looks like a perfect Peter Parker
>tfw he does not exist and won't be cast as MCU Spidey
![Byrne_spidey[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9Z9qE1i.jpg "Byrne_spidey[1].jpg")
>2015
>Marvel gets Spider-Man for multi-movie deal
>FOX and WB surely shitting bricks right about now
>>69375500
Fuck off, Miles is an awful character.
>>69375482
That would be retarded. Why waste a chance for Miles when 9/10 people don't give a shit what the cape's name is all their care about is the costume.
>>69375488
I'm not talking about Spider-Verse Miles though. Spider-Verse is just Spider murder porn when it should have been one big fuck yeah Spiders event.
They are just killing Spiders to make the Inheritors look bad ass which is shit writing. Deal with it.
The only news I care about is who's gonna play Spiderman, if It's Drake Bell I might see the new Sony movie since he really needs the cash, Same with if it's an actor I like. If they just get an unknown though I'll probably skip it and wait till it hits Netflix.
11/10 choice for the OP picture, mod-kun.
>>69375462
To be honest I don't think Spider-man being in MCU Civil War is good from a story telling perspective. Well, the revealing his identity part.
I don't think that scene and plotline would have that much of an impact as it would if THIS incarnation of Spider-man already had an established character/story behind him.
This is the first time we will be introduced to this Spider-Man. Will audiences be able to comprehend the gravity or significance of Peter's reveal? This Peter who we have never seen before? We know only, what, an hour of information about (if that)?
I think it would have been better to at least have one stand alone "new" Spider-man movie before Civil War.
Best Spider-Man was from 80s.
>>69375510
>>69375445
It's funny that Fox went ahead with FF, screwing Marvel but now need Marvel's say so to do tv stuff.
>>69375446
No chance. Hollywood execs wouldn't put a black guy as the face of one of the largest fucking superhero brand ever.
>>69375514
If it was the other way around, if they were jobbing completely, then you'd be complaining they aren't threatening enough.
Spiders that have no chance for another book are dying, be glad they at least got featured in SOMETHING other than fade into permanent obscurity.
>>69375477
Who drew that? Quesada?
>>69375466
Time might be an issue, if we do get something it'll be something simple like the back of a stunt guys head as he pulls the mask on, leaps off a building and we hear a thwip
>>69375507
Jesus Christ, it's uncanny.
Will they bring back J.K. Simmons?
>yfw when those 2 Amazing Spider-Man films were imagined by Jameson
>He shudders at thinking it
>this is his intro
>>69375507
HOLY SHIT IS THIS REAL?
>>69375539
based Stegman
I guess Spider-man confirmed for Infinity War then.
>>69375539
Stegman.
>>69375532
>It's either black or white in my comic writing
How about, and stay with me here, they write them threatening without killing off a fuck ton of Spiders?
>>69375507
Logan Lerman is close
>>69375468
Now that's my tempo
>>69375477
Mine was actually pretty subdued, but that's basically because I knew it was going to happen from Sony being hacked.
>>69375477
>INITIAL REACTIONS?
>more and more capeshit
SAVE US BASED JIM
>>69375516
Fuck off. Any other choice but Grant is retarded. Die.
>>69375557
fuck off with your bieber clone
>>69375477
I was doing the Tobey Maguire strut
>>69375563
/tv/ pls
>>69375523
Maybe do something in the Sony 2017 movie where it can hold some weight
>>69375566
I would love this. Too bad he's already the mother fucking FLASH
So are the Fantastic Four coming once that shitty reboot bombs?
I know I'm supposed to feel happy, but the fact that every superhero movie now will be some overloaded crossover smorgasbord makes me feel uncomfortable.
>>69375546
Marvel hates Simmons.
>>69375550
>become spider-man
>first villain fight
>Thanos
truly Parker luck at its best
>>69375414
OP which chapter does the picture from ?
>>69375585
Hickman's Avengers.
I thought you guys liked the ASM movies.
>yfw Rick will never play Flash
>>69375523
I hope that the new Spiderman Movie is a Prequel to Civil War. They should begin with the News footage and how all of it lead to this point of his reveal and then Peter should tell his Story how he became Spiderman, how he meet Fury and Ironman, what he did in the Battle for New York and the Ultron incident. And Civil War out of his Perspective. It should be like Forrest Gump with Spiderman.
Excuse me for liking the new Electro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDyAouw3nUw
>Potential Miles film
>Miles is trending
FUCK YES!
>>69375577
>yfw integrated into MCU because of Reed Richards bending dimensions or whatever
>>69375577
they'll probably crossover with x-men to salvage it first
>>69375577
We can only hope. This certainly makes it more likely.
>Captain Marvel and Inhumans delayed
>more time to force them on comics
>>69375563
>capeshit
Capefilm.
>>69375563
Spiderman doesn't have a cape you stupid cunt :)
>>69375579
The fuck gave you that idea?
>>69375598
I like this idea.although I liked that idea better when it was the Ant-Man plot, showing he was in all the previous Marvel movies but tiny so we never saw him
/tv/ has already called it
Spidy AOU's post credit scene confirmed
>>69375595
Only faggots who never read comics liked it.
>>69375603
Marvel will cockblock them. Fox has to pay them to make movies first.
I'm amazed that people defend the boring-ass Interstellar knockoff trailer as a sign the movie will be good, and that it was better than the Ant-Man trailer.
>>69375563
The director of Aquaman?
>>69375414
this really needs to have a continuous thread?
is there THAT much to discuss?
Holy tuck Marvel REALLY wanted Spidey n MCU because this is the most one sided deal ever.
Sny holds the rights.
Sony gains the profits.
Sony has creative control.
JUST so Marvel can make a movie.
Basically free movie for Sony.
>>69375579
He VAs in all 3 of their shitty cartoons
>>69375631
fuck off cuck
>>69375631
>>69375621
>and that it was better than the Ant-Man trailer.
It was
ZOMG STACKY
>>69375606
>More time to fix their comics
FTFY
>>69375617
That makes literally no sense.
While we're on the topic, I don't understand why Spidey is taking MCU release dates.
It's a Sony thing, Spidey should be using up a precious MCU slot.
>>69375634
Marvel still get all the important money (merchandising) and more people will go to see their Avengers films.
>>69375634
>Sony has creative control.
Then what changes?
>>69375631
shut the fuck up, cuck
>>69375598
So Spider-Man: Blue but not depressing?
>>69375596
tfw he looks more like Barry Allen than Barry Allen
>>69375631
>cucked by MCU
get cucked, DCUCK
>>69375655
>>69375639
>>69375637
not a cuck, I just don't think there's much to actually talk about....
>"Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films."
WHY
>>69375477
I was mastrubating right here.
>>69375664
they announced that Spider-Man will be in an MCU movie
they announced a new Spider-Man movie
not Andrew Garfield
>>69375661
I think they meant Flash Thompson.Flash Thompson is the Marvel universe's Barry Allen.
>>69375665
In name only. They'll be bullied around by Marvel and Disney despite all that.
>>69375604
No, it doesn't. Marvel and Sony were always cordial and collaborative, whereas Marvel and Fox hate eachother. Rights won't revert.
>>69375665
Because Sony knows how much Marvel wants him back. Having complete control prior to this deal was ALL the leverage Sony had. It was either "give us complete control or you continue to never have Spider-man in MCU".
>>69375507
Kind of looks like Michael Imperioli to me
Remember how ASM2 had a teaser for the new X-men movie after its credits?
It's gonna be like that but with MCU stuff.
>>69375664
Then don't.
There are continuous threads in the 100s about shitty webcomics that upload once a week on this board.
This gets a 2nd sticky because otherwise you'd get 500 threads about it.
Make dealings and go talk about something else.
>>69375654
Feige. He'll be the one telling them what the story needs to do and where it needs to lead, it'll be up to Sony how they build around the Marvel framework.
>>69375464
>Amazing Spider-Man 2 wasn't that bad
With an opinion like that you must eat cock.
I wish they'd go with their plan of having Peter as an adult (and maybe even married to MJ). JMS had them interacting with the (New) Avengers pretty well.
>>69375414
>and Amy Pascal, who oversaw the franchise launch for the studio 13 years ago
What? And oversaw ASM and ASM2 and just got taken out of the CEO spot. Fucking wow.
>>69375703
>With an opinion like that you must eat cock.
>>69375640
>Fake philosophical narration.
>Shots ripped off of Nolan.
>Minimal use of superpowers.
>Boring Negative Zone.
>The "big shot" is just the four of them staring blankly at the giant beam of light from Halo 3.
>They actively try to make the movie look as generic as possible.
Literally the only reason people are defending it is because it didn't look as awful as people were expecting.
>>69375634
kek, do you even spiderman?
spiderman makes tons of money in merchandise and if there is a successful movie there will be even more.
the biggest plus though is that Avi Arad is gone.
>>69375498
ASM2 was messy with some good moments, but I'll always defend ASM. I'm watching it right now and it's an underrated, genuinely good movie
>>69375477
This song starts to play in my head.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SpWAnBjdNg
>>69375477
Excited until I saw the delays for the other MCU films.
>>69375677
When I was super little, I was watching the Flash series and Amazing Friends, wondering why Flash was being a jerk to Spider-Man
>>69375713
It's called a teaser for a reason.
>>69375684
Amy just had it put in there to save her job. The truth of the matter is that Marvel can walk out any time they want. Sony meanwhile has barely any successful films.
>>69375739
Didn't she just quit her job or something along those lines?
ⓆⓊⒺⓈⓉⒾⓄⓃ
What's stopping Sony to do a shit movie afterwards? Seriously I just want good movies i don't care about cinematic universes, although deeply enjoy them, what if Sony make a complete mess like Amazing Spiderman again?
>>69375718
Lizard is an undercooked mess of a villain and the "Ben's killer' storyline is downright terrible. The action is really boring outside of the school sequence and that crane sequence is fucking retarded, even more so then the "YOU MESS WIT ONE OF UZ" scene from the RaimiMan movies.
I know there's going to be a lot of "HURR RAIMI FANBOY" shit, but I was honestly excited for this movie. SM3 proved we needed new blood and getting an indie director like Webb seemed like a good idea, also with a genuinely great cast. But they fucked up every aspect to make it a franchise-builder instead of an actual movie. it's the worst example since Iron Man 2, only to be topped by ASM2. It's a nothing movie, it's a fucking glorified TV pilot and it's practically shot like one. Webb's direction was amateur hour workmanlike crap.
It's better then ASM2 and SM3, but it's not good.
>>69375725
I'm only really excited for Cap 3 and Infinity War, thankfully they didn't delay those.
>>69375713
The interview the director gave where he was talking about going with an approach similar to "The Fly" is more a reason why people "defend it" (not that a movie that isn't even out yet needs to be defended).
I'm genuinely curious, it should be different from other cape films, which in itself is kind of a good thing.
>>69375760
Kevin Feige is the producer. Marvel can and will walk away if Sony fucks with them, and Sony Japan will fire anyone who makes Marvel walk away.
>>69375716
Avi Arad is now going to be responsible for turning MGS and GitS movies into piles of shit.
>>69375777
For all the butthurt of "not muh FF", I honestly wouldn't mind seeing this guy remake the fly and call it FF. I somehow doubt that's what Fox let him do, but still, it would at least be interesting.
>>69375784
Thanks
>>69375760
I don't think they *want* to do a shit movie, and it will be co-produced by "Kevin Feige and his expert team at Marvel". Which is not a guarantee of a great film either but there you go.
>>69375631
People are going to discuss it today, as they wake up and hear about it. Would you rather have it contained to one sticky on the very front page, or a dozen of the same "This happened, holy shit" threads at once?
>>69375770
>and that crane sequence is fucking retarded, even more so then the "YOU MESS WIT ONE OF UZ" scene from the RaimiMan movies.
Seriously. At least the Raimi film had the 9/11 excuse
>>69375788
>MGS movie turns out shit
At least we still have Cap 2 brother.
>>69375523
There have been five Spider-Man movies, even considering the fact that it'll be a new continuity everyone already knows what the deal with Spider-Man is.
It's like how they don't need to explain that Batman is hardcore about protecting Gotham in BvS, they've been over this enough times.
>>69375743
She's still attached to the only money making franchise she had. Does it really matter who it says she's employed by?
>>69375796
Sure, but that puts the whole "disability superpower" thing in another light. At least we know he got the idea from a good source.
I have hard time understanding why /co/ is hyped about this since Marvel has done maybe two good movies.
>>69375788
>MGS
Kojima can do that all on his own, thank you very much.
>>69375814
I'm ready to see him kick some Sinister Six ass.
That movie's been squashed, right?
>>69375833
hi /tv/, you can fuck off now.
>>69375788
> Avi Arad
> MGS
>>69375770
I disagree. The storyline was solid, and I enjoyed the Lizard. I also liked the character progression and how Uncle Ben's killer factored in it. The action scenes were entertaining enough, and I actually love the crane scene. Probably my favorite swing yet in all five movies.
And it wasn't really trying to build a franchise as much as it was setting up the Green Goblin, before Sony intervened and cut half the plot in half. The parents subplot wad originally a one-off.
>>69375784
>>69375802
I thought Kevin wanted to make a proper Thor film after two failures?
>>69375814
I never said anything about origin story. I don't want another origin story. It's about character development. Yes this is still Spider-man, but it's a NEW Spider-man.
There needs to be some character building before you drop a massive twist like Civil War on a character. That moment "worked" (debatable) in the comics because of all the history behind the character. This new Spider-man won't have that.
Lets say for argument's sake that Black Panther remains in Civil War instead of Spider-Man. T'Challa reveals his identity to the world in the movie. Would you care?
>>69375812
Exactly. That scene is campy and silly, but within the cultural context of he time it's forgivable. Also it does sort of feel like something out of the Ditko/Lee Spider-Man era, which is what the lifeblood of that first film was made up of.
That crane sequence is a campy moment in a film that's going for Nolan-esque serious drama. It had no place in the rest of the movie.
>>69375833
Because all of them have been better then the Webb films. I don't give a shit if Marvel, Fox, or even fucking WB owns Peter at this point. Hell, sell it to Archibald the Hobo King for all I care, but Sony has shown nothing but complete and utter incompetence with the ASM franchise and the leaked documents only bear that out even more.
Now we have someone other then the fucking monkeys at Sony overseeing the project. That's all I want.
>>69375788
>Avi Arad is responsible for removing Hayter.
Why does this man have so much power
>>69375834
After all, he's been making MGS movies for years now.
>>69375464
Amazing Spider-Man 2 was awful. That fucking web hand.
>>69375760
SONY owns the movie rights to Spidey, so they can release a movie like that and Marvel cant do anything about it.
What they are doing is lending the character over and with good will and cooperation continue to make Spidey movies in the MCU continuity. Hell, they might just add the amazing series as background already.
>>69375838
It was a genuine question you prick. IM was good and TWS was passable but rest was below average are outright terrible.
>>69375770
NO, they fucked up because they would let Webb make the movie, and kept fucking him over and making him change shit.
>>69375725
Well if nothing else that gives them more time to polish those scripts.
>>69375873
Okay, sounds reasonable I guess.
>>69375798
>>69375860
>>69375807
ok, when you put it like that, it makes more sense.
>>69375845
the swinging is great, all the webslinging in TASM/2 is fucking orgasmic, and TASM as the added bonus of much of it being real.
but "my kid was saved, I gotta help spidey!!1" nah, fuck that bullshit.
i hated it in 2012, I hated it in 2004, and I hated it in 2002
its fucking dumb.
>>69375833
Because anything, anything, is better than another Andrew Garfield movie. Fuck the Amazing Spider-Man 2 with a pitchfork.
What an abortion of a movie.
>>69375865
>T'Challa
tag spoilers pls
>>69375877
>Hell, they might just add the amazing series as background already.
ITS CONFIRMED TO BE A NEW SPIDER-MAN
CONTINUITY REBOOT
why is this hard for people to fucking understand when it's been laid out already?
>>69375865
Well I didn't say anything about origin either. I'm saying people are already familiar enough with the character that they don't need to see a whole movie to understand why it's a big deal.
But despite that I don't think they should or will reveal his identity because it's the first movie and they'd have to One More Day it immediately.
Wait, how would we react if the first MCU Spidey movie was actually One More Day?
>>69375414
>On twitter trending:
>Miles Morales
Why would they use Miles Morales when they already have Peter Parker, wouldn't it make more sense to use Peter until said actor's contract runs out in which they replace him with Miles?
I can taste those delicious tears of ASM fags who said Sony and Marvel will never make a deal and that ASM 3 will happen and Garfield>Tobey
Glad I still dont have to watch ASM2 after the abomination that was ASM1
>>69375941
It's already confirmed to be Peter. But Garfield is out.
>>69375877
Isn't there a matter of "first appearance " or something like that, tough? Like, Deaht head appeared first in the Marvel continuity, before becoming a recuring vilain in the Transformers Marvel comic so that MArvel can claim it is a Marvel character and not a Transformers character.
By appearing in the MCU first, Couldn't Marvel claim that iteration of Spiderman belong to them and if they think Sony disrespec that iteration of Spiderman, they can go "no, fuck, this isn't our Spider Man, Sony is like, tottaly a different Spiderman than Mine Spiderman and Sony can't play with my other toys anymore". or something like that?
>>69375941
Are you all ready for peter to be and already established street level hero and dieing in the first movie he appears in and then getting replaced by miles
>>69375947
>It's already confirmed to be Peter
Can I have sauce please
>tfw they hire Tobey so we will feel the "emotion" when spidey takes his mask off
going to celebrate this news by buying Spidey comics, are there any recommendation lists for them out there?
>>69375968
I actually wouldn't mind if they did that after a few movies. Might be a nice progression.
>>69375414
>Andrew Garfield is not expected to reprise the character.
Probably for the best.
For all its (many) faults, the ASM series pretty much ran on the strength of Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone's chemistry. There's a reason why they cut the MJ scenes out of ASM2 when there was all that other bloat they could've picked. With her character dead, ASM3 would've sputtered.
Unless they did some sort of riff on the Clone Saga, like when they brought Gwen back as Ultimate Carnage, but there's way too many ways for that sort of plot to go wrong.
I just wish they'd do a little side character stuff. I want to see Pete be all Archie Andrews with MJ and Deb Whitman while blowing off steam by pranking Flash after JJJ has chewed him out for shitty pics. I wasnt a TSSM movie, I guess
So no Sinister Six?
Thank fuck.
>>69375984
Anything that tie with Spider-verse but isn't actually written by Slott.
>>69375975
Read the press release.
>>69375864
I'm sure he wants to... how does that contradict what I said?
>>69375982
>"Fuck, he got old"
Is it true the people hoping for Miles just have massive white guilt or are black themselves? No one could unironically want that shit over Parker.
>>69375941
>make more sense to use Peter until said actor's contract runs out in which they replace him with Miles?
Usually studio contracts involving multi picture deal are not mutually binding, meaning studios usually can opt out of the contract but the actor cannot (like in the case of Terrence Howard with IM 2)
Sony very likely has no legal obligation to continue using Garfield. Marvel has already made their dislike of Garfield known so its very likely we get a new person as Spider-Man
>>69375601
fund it
So what level of involvement does Marvel even have with the stand-alone Spidey films because it sounds like Sony's still able to continue making shitty Spider-Man movies.
>>69375941
I have no idea why anyone would want Miles. As a fan of Ultimate Spider-man, I've been immensely disappointed with Miles; He doesn't even have his own plotline! All his stories were the loose ends cribbed from Peter Parker...Until they outright brought Peter Parker back!
So far, his storylines involved:
1.) Being bitten by another spider, similar to the one that created Peter Parker.
2.) Becoming Spider-man in order to take up Peter's legacy.
3.) Dealing with Venom, a creature created by Peter's father.
4.) Ultimates.
5.) Fighting Norman Osborn, Peter Parker's nemesis. (And dealing with Peter returning to life.)
Even Bendis couldn't make Miles interesting. He has, what, his supervillain uncle? (Whom he killed.) His dad, a former SHIELD agent?
Uh...Norman Osborn being obsessed with Miles, too? What does Miles have going for him, besides the Venom Blast?
>>69375473
>another brit scum playing a true american hero
pls no
ps fuck cook
>>69375941
Miles is never going to happen the same way a Kamala Khan movie isn't going to happen. And it has nothing to do with race, as much as people claim otherwise.
They're both too new. They barely have a consistent supporting cast, unique rogues gallery or iconic story arcs to their name. There's nothing to work with in either case for a set of movies, they're un-molded characters.
We honestly have a better chance of getting a 2099 Spidery movie then a Miles Morales movie. And as much as my dick would get rock hard at that idea, that's also never going to happen either.
>>69375880
I'll give you my quick and dirty, probably WRONG, opinion:
People on /co/ shit on IM3, but I got to see it opening night for free and it was a fucking blast. Loved every second of it. I get people complaining about the lack of Iron Man, the over saturation of the suits at the end, and the fire powers people, but the movies' main appeal has always been RDJ's Stark, and this was by far the best of the IM movies to for that.
Captain America was okay. This is probably about the baseline of what people mean by "bland MCU films." I'd probably place it on par with ASM, if not a little better. Not exactly making a hard list here, though.
Avengers was fun to watch at the time, but I've only seen it once and will admit the critique it gets around here is probably accurate for the most part. It was probably mostly the hype from the preceeding movies. I distinctly remember being a little annoyed at how all the characters, regardless of their personalities, ended up quipping and being WHEDON characters even back then.
GotG was every Avengers was trying to be, but better. It managed to do an ensemble movie with having 5 movies to set up the characters before hand. It also managed to be a fun movie without falling into the "everyone talks like a Whedon character" banter of Avengers and actually had some moving moments. It's the only movie aside from IM1 I've seen twice, in theaters no less, and I'd easily see it again. There are good reasons it took off like it did and blew ASM2 out of the water domestically (though not overall).
Aside from that, both Thor movies were pretty forgettable aside from a few amusing scenes. It's pretty obvious Loki stole the show in Thor 1 and Avengers and so they squeezed him into Thor 2. Never seen the Incredible Hulk, probably never going too. I might see a Mark Ruffalo Hulk film, or even just "Stark and Banner's Wild Science Adventure." Looking forward to seeing what happens with the Hulk in AoU.
>>69376020
>Marvel and Sony Pictures are also exploring opportunities to integrate characters from the MCU into future Spider-Man films.
Marvel won't lend any of his toy with Sony if Sony doesn't play with Spidey the way he want it. And then Sony will have to play with Marvel's toy also the way he want it or he is taking them back.
Holy shit it's real!
>>69376011
I'm part black and latino, I like Miles, and I will be damned if I get that shit when all the cards are in place for a perfect Spidey franchise. Peter Parker or bust
>>69375982
You'll feel the feels when it's Donald Glover
>>69375414
>#2
The new moot should start getting checks from Marvel.
>>69376029
still, it would be rather funny if they killed Andrew Garfield by killing Peter.and Marvel will do this in 10 years to their Peter if they still have producer control by then.
>>69376036
All in all, though, the majority of the Hype can be summed us by the MCU being THE Marvel universe representation on the big screen. Spider-Man being a part of that is a big thing.
We've had Marvel movies for years, but the MCU is the one that brings all this stuff together and has at least a consistent ability to put at passable at worst and great at best movies that don't just shit the bed.
>>69376036
>I distinctly remember being a little annoyed at how all the characters, regardless of their personalities, ended up quipping and being WHEDON characters even back then.
I really never get that critique. Not seeing it at all.
>>69376044
Doesn't the same apply with Spidey appearing in other Marvel films since Sony still has creative control?
>>69376053
The only thing I can think of is to prevent the pages from destroying browsers and computers.
Remember what happened to that /a/ thread that moot posted in during his goodbye? It took MINUTES to load that thing.
This news makes me want to jump and pretend to have web shooters like I did when I was 9.
Based fuckin' Spidey.
>>69375635
>EMH
>Shitty
>>69376010
But didnt some people wanted a mature spidey? I know choosing Tobey again will probably not happen, but a man can dream
>>69376052
If they go with Miles I prefer Gambino a thousand times over a guy as Jaden Smith or some shit like that
Marvel needs to save Ghostbusters and possibly Men in Black.
>>69376036
>and so they squeezed him into Thor 2
Squeezed? The movie is mostly about Thor and Loki's relationship.
Hope we get a real Venom out of this, or at least someone that hasn't been done like Kraven or Mysterio.
>>69376067
Actually I'm talking about all this Disney shilling.
inb4 sonyfag, foxfag, warnerfag. I learned to stay away from cape movies thanks to /co/.
>>69375572
>Who is Chris Evans?
>>69375482
I'm getting sick and tired of you pushy niggers.
When the time comes to cast a childhood favorite you're all lobbying for Basketball-Americans to get the role because "muh diversity", "enough with the white men named Chris"...
Fuck you self centred cunts.
What about Asians or Hispanics? Natives or Eastern European? You've already got War Machine, Falcon, Heimdal, and Luke Cage and Black Panther coming up.
Think of someone else for once you damned dirty apes.
>>69375532
Spiders that were well liked were brutally murdered by shit OC characters in the worst way possible.
Why?
To play up beyond shitty spider-people that NO ONE FUCKING CARES ABOUT!
Killing off fucking spiderman and his amazing friends will not make anyone like fucking spock silk kain or flash venom AT ALL. They are damned to obscurity and will carry the weight of being the REASON that so many good spider charcters that people like had to fucking die. No one outside of comics knows or fucking cares about those faggots and from their horrible fucking sales and total lack of fucking appreciation from anyone outside of shills no one gives a fuck amongst the degenerate comic addicted masochistic geeks either.
This event is a fucking failure and I'll be goddamned if I ever fucking buy or purchase or watch another spiderman event after this.
I even fucking stood by and watched OMD go down and the subsequent retardation that followed go down.
This is it.
I can't do it anymore.
I'm fucking done.
Comic spiderman is dead to me.
>>69376092
You'll get Agent Venom.
>>69376078
>Forgot he revoiced him in EMH
If only we could get more TSSM cartoon now
>>69376049
Sounds good. During the race wars you will be spared friend.
>>69376036
>Avengers was fun to watch at the time, but I've only seen it once and will admit the critique it gets around here is probably accurate for the most part. It was probably mostly the hype from the preceeding movies. I distinctly remember being a little annoyed at how all the characters, regardless of their personalities, ended up quipping and being WHEDON characters even back then.
Not the guy you're answering to but I didn't watch it till like 2013 after /co/ was saying how shit it was, and I ended up pleasantly surprised. It's really not as shit as people make it out to be.
>>69376060
Thor's "he's adopted" line sticks out. It's sort of out of place, considering how big a part Loki being Thor's brother, no qualifiers, is to Thor's character in both his films.
Black Widow's "I don't see how that's a party" also comes to mind, but it my just be the ways Scarlett Johansson voiced it. It sounded incredibly off.
It's honestly been awhile since I saw it, so that's all I can remember. And it's really not the worst Whedon thing when it comes to this, I know that. Maybe /co/'s just rubbed off on me. I liked the banter, but I still kind of recalled it being a bit much.
Captain America's "I understood that reference" is actually a nice, in character joke, showing off how dopey of a guy he still is in the modern world.
Nice tr-
>Sticky
THANK YOU BASED LICH
>>69376011
>No one could want something I don't want
Comic fans are literally the worst fan base
>>69376104
Oh shit, it's true. What about Slott's crappy Spider-Man run? Is he going to resurrect all those dead Spideys now that things have changed?
>>69376107
Please no.
I miss the salivating space stalker.
>>69376103
>tfw still no Amadeus Cho/Herc movie which would show Thor movies how it's done
>>69376108
Unfortunately since SSM was Sony, I think this deal blows any chance of S3 out to orbit ;_;
>>69376011
>being black invalidates your opinion
Fucking Americans
>>69376107
Yes please.
>>69376087
If only they could get someone like JMS on it to make some cinematic Real Ghostbusters
>>69375414
>tfw this scene wont happen
>>69376117
Whereas moviefags are highly intelligent, right?
>>69376088
Squeezed was perhaps the wrong word, I certainly didn't mind it and it didn't stick out editing-wise.
But it's still well known they went back and shot additional Loki scenes to get that sweet Hiddleston press.
>>69376115
The party line would be terrible regardless of whoever said it. It's so generic deadbeat humor. It's a nonjoke.
>>69376115
those lines are really the only ones that were in any way bad.
otherwise i didnt see the whole "everyone talks the same" thing at all.
that black widow line was cringeworthy tho
>>69376103
They twins in the avengers are supposed to be gypsies. They aren't.
And god knows the gypsies need a good rolemodel in media.
I have not heard a fucking peep out of you fucking people about that.
Only that you don't want a character to be played by a black person.
You disgust me.
>Thor, Panther, Marvel, and Inhumans pushed back for Spider-Man
Why? Couldn't they have put it in early 2017 where they had nothing? Now they've likely got to re-evalutate the story for those movies, besides Thor, now that they all take place after Infinity War.
>>69376049
Your race doesn't make your opinion any more valid? Why do people do this? My race not withstanding I want a Miles film
>>69376115
I'm fine with the Whedoning of the characters in the Avengers movies. Even looking at it from the comic book perspective, big team-up stories always have the complexities of the individual characters shaved off to serve the taste of the writers style.
I also wish people would stop saying "hurr you mean Iron Man the Movie guest-starring the Avengers" when you'd basically have to be legally blind and deaf to think that's true, but that's clearly not going to happen.
>>69376066
Marvel is the rich Kid who has almost all the toys.
Sony is the poor kid who has just one toy the rich kid doesn't have but would like to.
So, if Sony want to play with all the toys the rich kid has, he has to play by the rich kid's rules, even for his own toy.
>>69376129
That shit needs to be an animated short, Disney
>>69375572
As much as he probably loves playing Barry I'm sure he wouldn't think twice if Marvel came along offering him the chance to play their biggest superhero in a multimillion dollar movie franchise.
>tfw we'll get Evans Cap and Spidey in the same movie
>tfw Spidey will be a Cap fanboy
This day is amazing, /co/.
>>69375468
>>69375546
J.K. dropped some pretty heavy hints that he could be taking up the role again about a week ago.
Maybe if this works Fox will do the same with Fantastic Four.
But not X-Men. They can keep that.
>>69376092
oh man a kraven movie would be amazing
in fact i think a mysterio/kraven team up would work out great.
>>69376151
Well, let's not forget that the rich kid sold the toy to the poor kid when the rich kid was poor and the poor kid was rich.
>>69376113
Oh no, I still regard it fondly. I actually loved the banter, but I'm also not as tired of Whedon as others might be. Really all I've seen of him is Firefly, and the movie, and that one episode of Buffy where Seth Green fucks the other werewolf chick. And the musical, I guess.
I should really rewatch Avengers to get all refreshed on it.
So have they started filming Civil War yet or is there still time to work Spider-Man into the plot?
>>69376147
It's not about validation. Just because I'm black doesn't mean I have to want a Miles Morales movie though
>>69376131
Nice strawman considering I never even said that.
>>69376168
sauce, anon. I wont have my hopes high without a sauce.
>>69376092
Venom movie then Maximum Carnage
>Inhumans after IW pt.2
So how the hell are they killing Thanos then? Those were the type of heavy hitters they needed.
>>69376056
Considering Spider-Man is Marvel's flagship character, yeah, it's really a big thing.
It would be like if DC had an established shared movie universe with no Superman in it. It would feel weirdly empty.
>>69376115
Each of those lines still fit the characters and the context. They are funny on their own and don't really bring contradictions. Even in Avengers itself, we still get to see the strong relationship between Thor and Loki.
>>69376115
>>69376133
>Black Widow's "I don't see how that's a party" also comes to mind
My take on it has always been that everyone has started to make banters and she isn't on the page. She is like, what the fuck are you all talking about. She is a professional who doesn't kid when she does her job and she can't encompass anyone would make a crack during a moment like this.
The joke is that the joke is flying over her head.
>>69376178
They start filming in April and I'm pretty sure they had 2 scripts in case the Spidey deal would work.
Black Panther will probably have just a cameo now and Spidey will take his place.
>>69376189
nice chat
>>69376107
Please no
>>69376174
Its a story that almost write itself.
>>69376163
Why arent they fucking?
>>69376195
you now, your explanation makes it work somewhat
>>69376115
>>69376137
"Puny God" is totally an Hulk line. Fuck the haters on that one.
>>69375566
>Marvel casting a CW tier actor
I don't think they are that desperate
>>69376160
You know that the little match girl tale, the reference for that spiderman story, had an adaptation made by disney on 1937 right?
>>69376147
Read the post of the guy he replied to you tard.
My race not withstanding, I don't want a Miles film. He's way too boring.
