Hey anon, how do you like your steak? Cooking now.
I've got more.
>>7053008
Well done with a-1
>>7053008
Pan is way too small to be cooking those 2 steaks
>>7053049
The steaks are simply too big for the pan
And now
>>7053008
I had tuna steaks, seared rare with mashed celeriac.
>>7053071
>didn't cook the onions for about five minutes and then put the steak on that
>no bell peppers
>no black pepper
6/10 subpar steak
>
>>7053071
Presto chango onion go.
medium rare
Jesus christ man. Clean your fucking stove sometime.
is medium rare a meme?
Steaks finishing in oven, everyone wanted different doneness so cooked in time order. Will clean stove later.
Is quality a meme?
>>7053113
Everything is a meme.
Bitches
>>7053167
You should use that $100 towards a new stove that isn't from the 60's.
Otherwise, looks good. I wouldn't mind a steak right now.
If your steak takes more than 3 minutes to blacken your pan isn't hot enough honestly
Making some ribs argentina style.
Your steaks look great btw
>>7053180
Stove not getting hot enough. Burner was on full for 5+min before tested
>>7053201
I leave a cast iron pan on a hot stove for at least 10 minutes
It should be hot enough that any pepper added glows red
>>7053206
I will remember that for next time. I use skating water.
>>7053095
>bell peppers
>not reversing the order of baking and searing for superior juiciness
You got it wrong, bro.
>>7053167
Only the one on the far right seems to have a decent sear. Also sear the sides first otherwise they'll get steam cooked, as they did here. Also for steaks that size, oven is totally unnecessary to hit medium rare, I wonder why people keep doing this shit. For those steaks, assuming cooking from room temp, 90 seconds each side then rest tented with foil should hit mid rare.
>>7053341
Oven at a low temp means the color gradient will be a lot smaller and you'll end up with pretty much the entire center of the meat being cooked a uniform medium rare instead of having only the center be medium rare. Slow-cooking also increases tenderness, so it's arguably a better way to do it if you've got time.
>>7053341
Unfortunately, not everyone wanted medium rare. I did the steaks 2 at a time on the skillet, i think the problem was that i didnt let the skillet set between steaks.
>>7053008
Medium-Rare Please
>>7053167
fucking classless, enjoy your steamed steaks.
>>7053379
Yeah what I mean is its really hard to keep it on the pan long enough to get a very good sear and do the oven thing if you want to end up in med rare. A good way to do it would be instead of cooking two separate steaks, cook a single giant steak and separate them after cooling, that way you'll have enough time. Some people intentionally cook straight out of fridge to have a similar effect. If you leave the steak uncovered in the fridge for a while it'll dry the surface and that would help the sear too.
>>7053433
Did you dry the surface of the second set of steaks? They look pretty wet on the pic, that will fuck with your sear and make oil spatter around. Cast iron might not need it but usually having more oil in the pan helps too. You need to be careful though.
>>7053804
That's why you do it the other way around and cook the steaks in the oven 5-10 degrees below your final temp and then sear. Oven dries the outside of the steak out a bit and after that the steak sears in less than 10 seconds on each side, it's how I cook steaks that are too thin to cook on the grill or in a pan without getting too much of it well done on the sear.
>>7054024
How long do you cook the steak in the oven? What temperatures do you use.
>>7053095
>6/10
>subpar
>>7053167
>>7053008
with some 'ta on the side, usually sketti
>>7053071
>cooking red onion
This is next-level b8.
>>7053167
>he still uses cash
Sous Vide, rare, scorched before and after.
>>7055040
>scorched
>>7055042
Seared with a torch. Whatever.
>>7055040
those are two different cuts of meat... how is that comparable?
>>7055096
Better?
>>7055098
Thanks daddy
>>7054109
Depends how long you're willing to wait and how low your oven will go. I just stick it in there at around 200 degrees and check every so often with a meat thermometer to see how hot it is, then I pull it out at 125 degrees and the sear generally gives it an extra 5 degrees or so for a perfect medium rare.
>>7055250
Well you are more or less emulating sous vide cooking, might as well go the full way. You don't need fancy gizmos, you can sous vide a steak in a beer cooler pretty successfully as its done in a relatively low temperature for a relative short amount of time compared to other shit like veggies.
>>7055098
The sous vide one looks farm raised
>>7055266
Trufax on the beer cooler, but the equipment is cheap and sexy, so~
>>7055276
Well, 199$ don't sound that cheap to me :(
>>7055266
I was making a suggestion to other people, and more people are likely to try using an oven to get a better-cooked steak than they are dropping $100-350 on what might seem like some weird gimmick machine that cooks meat with water.
>>7055289
You don't cook much, do you?
>Heavy mixer runs like $500
>Immersion blender $100
>Hydrodistilation equipment $200
>I mean~
>>7055316
I cook every day and have none of those. Get your head out of your ass
>>7055400
I cook every day and don't use them every time, but I'll keep my privileged white head firmly planted in my ass.
Alaskan king crab
>>7055316
>You don't cook much, do you?
>>Heavy mixer runs like $500
>>Immersion blender $100
>>Hydrodistilation equipment $200
>>I mean~
HAHAHA LOL. You are the kitchen equivalent of the dude buying a stratocaster for his first guitar lesson. Have fun eating your disgusting soup blended in a vitamix noob.
>>7053167
>puts steaks in the oven
pretty pleb tbqh
>>7055528
Did you see a vitamix on that list?
>>7053071
RUINED
U
I
N
E
D
my roommate just put so much god damn seasoning on these steaks she cooked, my eyes are watering
bless her heart
>>7057047
>Bunch of expensive gizmos
>Not even a Vitamix
Hahaha el oh el, do you even cook?
>>7057170
>$100 expensive
What do you cook in, pots made of tinfoil?
Emptied cans of Prego?
>>7057294
100$ isn't expensive, 100$ on its own has no bearing whatsoever. 100$ for some stupid gizmo so that you can lord it on people on anonymous image boards is expensive.
