Haven't seen one of these in a while, let's see some cosplay
>>8900926
>>8900927
>>8900930
>>8900932
>>8900933
>>8900936
>>8901423
Ugh I couldn't find her pic but this one girl I saw in tumblr made her elsa bodice using a shit ton of large square beads (with i think a fancy sheen or somthng like mother of pearl?) of various sizes sewn all over it. Like a mosaic. It looked super awesome and Im using hers as inspiration while making mine
>>8901425
>>8902621
>>8900925
>Asian girl cosplaying white character
>no one calls her racist for pretending to be another race
>>8902629
No one complains as long as it's light skin cosplaying light skin. Hiro cosplayer from earlier is a white person cosplaying an Asian character, but no one complains about that either.
>>8902624
I saw her at Chicago comic con. Loved it. Excuse the potato quality.
>>8901593
I really like this, except for the really modern hair brush. That really distracts me
>>8902629
Negative attention only really sparks when the cosplayer tries to put on an existing skin color that sharply contrasts their own.
>>8902624
>>8903068
are there any more examples of ursula cosplays? ideally fatties, because i am fat and uggo and want to cosplay my queen.
i only have OTT make-up saved for inspo
>>8904168
>>8904376
Kek that's so cute.
This is a self post, but I'm happy to say Cinderella's nearly done, just waiting on the shoes. Also, for anyone looking at the Royal Enchantments Cinderella wig, go for it. It's easily my new favorite wig in the collection.
>>8905240
Is that Jokerella? Extend the mouth corners a little and it fits.
>>8905423
What climb into your panties today?
>>8904497
What are these from? I don't recognize them.
>>8905727
The one in the middle is a Haunted Mansion maid and I'm only guessing that the other two are from the haunted mansion ride but I'm not sure.
>>8905738
They are from Haunted Mansion
>>8905801
What's this from?
>>8905816
Meet the Robinsons
>>8904490
This makes me so happy
>>8905947
They are in the graveyard at the end in different places, I believe the ghost in the pointy hat is next to the opera singer
>>8904472
that Rapunzel... shes cute but i do not like that version of the cosplay
>>8906145
Disney cosplayers usually annoy me because it's like the adult version of girls obsessed with going to the prom, but this is fucking awesome and I love it.
>>8905297
what the fuck
>>8905828
i guess the cold does bother this one
>>8905297
>>8901537
This?
>>8906163
Same here. The details are nice but the proportions are waaaay off because of the hem details she added. With that many flowers added to the bottom of the skirt, it should either hit right below knee or at the ground, not at the weird tea/midi-length. In both her pictures, it looks like someone cropped out her calves and awkwardly re-pasted her feet onto the bottom of the skirt.
>>8906709
Girl, she still ugly. No photoshop can help that.
>>8905793
this looks so good, the wig is the perfect colour.
love seeing aurora in her blue dress
>>8908737
That's a photoshopped parks dress not a cosplayer. More evidence that aurora should just be in blue in the parks but kids would probably think she's Elsa.
>>8908857
Or maybe it is a cosplayer, I can't actually tell on my phone. Regardless you're totally right about the wig being on point.
>>8911662
Is that supposed to be Barf?
>>8911670
pretty sure it's quasimodo
>>8908857
Nope, it's a cosplayer. They didn't make a blue redesign dress (even in Paris) and that's not Paris' castle anyway (it's Anaheim or Hong Kong).
>>8907764
I'm in love!
>>8906630
Why do people do this?
>>8911869
Why not
>>8905240
You're cute.
>>8911662
Almost looks like gus gus
>>8905795
The edit for this one is hurting my eyes.
>>8905781
Why do all cosplayers give Judy long hair? It would make much more sense for the wig to be short, considering she's a short haired bunny in a public duty job, so at least she'd put her hair up and out of the way if she was a human.
>>8914213
I think a short bob would be suitable
>>8914949
But... kevins a girl...
>>8906145
Kek this is great
>>8914213
Without ears, a long grey wig or pigtails makes sense to reference long ears, but with ears I'd probably go with a bob.
>>8900925
>217
It's cute none the less
>>8911657
I like this a lot for some reason, and I can't tell if it's because it's a well-done photo or if I actually like the costume.
>>8903563
what is wrong with her face
>>8906593
What is this from?
>>8917156
zootopia, its the shakira antelope
>>8912491
Because photoshoping yourself this much is cringey
Maybe not the best cosplay but is the best performance that I see of Mulan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2y7GYUFA84s
Any cosplays of obscure Disney characters?
>>8914468
Oh my god this is the best thing
>>8911768
They specifically said it's a photoshopped face character...
Why are all the Disney cosplays so good when all the anime cosplays on this board are so trash
>>8919859
I wish I had a duck I could do this to, it's so freaking cute
>>8906807
Not that one anon, its super beautiful bUT I dont think those round square ones are beads
>>8900936
Name? Is this OC?
>>8921185
It's Hiro from Big Hero 6.
>>8906709
she would have made a great hans as she's very....
HANS-some
>>8906709
I can't get over how manly and...weird this chick looks.
>>8921453
Who is this supposed to be?
>>8922168
it's belle you idiot
Selfpost. I really want to redo this cosplay
>>8924365
I like how simple this is.
>>8924362
is that a taco bellle? really?
>>8924738
This is so terrible it's vaulted into the world of amazing. I can't figure out who I like more.
>>8924741
tiny face merida is my fav, her face looks so very small
>>8924738
That elsa though
>>8921878
her anna makes me think of an older middle eastern man.
>>8926982
She reminds me of a cartoon character but I honestly cannot for the life of me remember the character's name. I just remember her being this giant blob child thing.
>>8926982
Kinda reminds me of this
>>8906709
THIS salty bitch.
>>8927147
FOUND IT.
>>8924738
Reminds me of all of those half assed cosplays from 2006-2008
>>8927217
haha, the bane of the houston cosplay scene.
>>8927253
Oh God my sides
I like the twist on this
>>8927519
Yeah, "generic steampunk" is totally refreshing
>>8927536
I'm afraid so...
>>8927519
Wasn't this in the days when steampunk was only starting to get big?
>>8903563
please tell me her head isnt actually that massive
>>8927527
This is Artful Dodger, she did this years ago lol
>>8927253
Holy shit anon, this character is EXACTLY the first thing I thought of when I saw that girl. I'm so happy someone else saw this too.
>>8932700
Why would you have pigtails and bunny ears? The point of the pigtails is to replicate the ears in a human version. If you're going to do ears, you don't need something to replace the ears.
>>8919371
>>8900925
Ok, but why is no one bringing up that her dress is really badly made? The part with the seashell and the gathering looks like it should be down at her bust line, and there's no structure to the bodice at all.
>>8921727
I think they're asking for the cosplayer's name anon...
>>8936609
Why are you bringing it up?
>>8935806
where is her body?! That's some serious photoshop of horrors.
>>8904168
>i only have OTT make-up saved for inspo
Look up the drag queen Divine. It's who the animators based Ursula off of originally.
>>8936680
..it's under the cape? it looks like she's arching backwards, anon. thats probably why it looks like she doesn't have half of her body.
>>8936680
Also as someone who does falconry, this picture is hilariously unbelievable. Her hands would be ripped to shreds.
>>8937390
That was my first thought until I noticed the body (though anon-above may be right that she's leaning backwards and it just looks weird). The actual photoshop execution of placing the bird's feet on her hands is not bad, but it's a goddamn raptor with raptor talons on bare human skin.
>>8927217
Damn son, what happened there?
>>8937823
finally, a Judy that uses a shirt like she does in the movie.
The collar should be different + no mesh panels, but her shirt is a fitted sports kind of shirt, not a blue business shirt.
>>8933482
This makes me happy because the Little Mermaid 2 was one of my favorite movies when I was younger and I wished Melody showed up more. That's the curse of direct-to-DVD though.
>>8937845
That wig is beautiful
>>8937961
It's not often that you see a cosplay from one of the Disney dtv sequels
>>8937961
I really liked her character too! (liked the movie as well other than some hamfisted plot points, but all dtv movies have that)
>>8937390
what if it's a taxedermized bird tho
>>8939056
It's very obviously not.
>>8940258
It makes me happy that Kelldar is still around. She started cosplaying a year before I did, way back in the stone age.
>>8939591
what's so obvious about that? are you a taxidermist?
waiting for it..
>>8940853
Waiting for what?
>>8940954
for it to be cosplayed, presumably
>>8940365
Are you really that stupid or are you just pretending to be because this is an anon site?
>>8940853
Already seen something like this cosplayed.
>>8935786
Holy crap yes
Has there ever been a obscure Disney character that you always wanted to cosplay as?
>>8941067
They were cosplaying the old version, not the new drawing.
>>8941045
i'm sorry that you're unable to answer. why don't you go falconing again to clear your delicate head
>>8906309
You sound like one of those people who didn't go to prom or wore converse to prom to be edgy.
>>8943295
I"m the falconer, not the other person being rude to you. For one, the animal has a band around it's leg--you wouldn't have a band around a taxidermy--real live animals are banded, which helps tell you it's a real animal (and part of a photoshop). Also...as someone who also does own a lot of taxidermy (I have a lot of weird hobbies I get it) I honestly don't think she could hold it like that for a picture? It would be top heavy as hell. A live animal would be holding himself up, while she would be having to hold the actual taxidermy up.
Additionally there is motion in the wings, another sign of a live animal. Which wouldn't be there in taxidermy.
>>8936674
Other people are critiquing other cosplays. Why exempt this one?
>>8935806
As someone who works with eagles I don't understand why anyone would think it would be a good idea to shoop one on her bare hands.
The claws of an eagle can easily crush your wrist. There is a reason we're wearing those gaint ass gloves.
Also it's way too heavy to hold like that.. wth were they thinking???
Can we move off the bad Merida shoop and just post disney?
>>8943295
That bird is *moving* in the picture. This is not rocket science that it's a picture of a live animal.
>>8904376
so accurate
>>8945556
Spot on cosplay.
>>8946100
Doesn't even resemble the character in the slightest
>>8946101
That's because it's not actually meant to be her. It's a separate photoshoot that model did with the bear, that someone just slapped the name Merida on because they wanted to take some credit.
>>8946100
Why would Merida pose sexually with a bear when the bears in the movie were her mother or brothers. And that other one, but he was trying to kill them (unless I'm mixing it up with HTTYD2)
>>8945787
they photoshopped everything else, why not put a little bit of motion blur so it doesn't look so dead?
>>8946068
>Spot on
Actually there's a ton of inaccuracies in the details, but they're having fun so who cares.
>>8940853
Its literally a few replies above yours ya fuckin dip
>>8949447
face character
>>8937823
That girl really has a perfect face for Judy
>>8940853
I like how historically accurate this is, but I feel like it will never be cosplayed for that exact reason.
People only like shit like this when it's tacky as fuck and has elements ripped from every fucking time period in the history of the world.
>>8949927
Ehh, don't really know about historically accurate? Kind of ironic you're complaining about other people being tacky when this has a gigantic bow glued down the middle of the underskirt with a giant fake rose tacked on to it and what look like curtain ropes dangling off. idk.
>>8947040
thats a cosplay of the old drawing. the original artist redesigned it. ya fuckin delight
>>8935806
>>8937390
>>8937640
The falcon is real.
>>8951355
>>8935806
>>8937390
>>8937640
Sorry, I meant to say eagle.
>>8951441
She said on deviantart that the owner had clipped the nails.
>>8952028
Because modern protective gear looks different from traditional gear?
>>8946100
why is Alea the Huntress making out with Merida's mom?
>>8952035
Only if cosplayer could somehow craft something.. hmm...
>>8946234
It isn't a merida Cosplay. It's just a random arty shoot that someone has shoved Merida over the top. Her name is Tina Rybakova or something
>>8950083
1770s gowns could look tacky as hell. Big bows, flowers, and those "curtain ropes" are common themes.
>>8953163
I'm so sorry, I could be mistaken, but in that example I'm not seeing any big bows, fake flowers or "curtain ropes"? Lots of gathered fabrics, and one small bow at the chest.
Even in the famous Fragonard painting of Madame Pompadour, easily one of the most ostentatious dresses of the eighteenth century, wasn't quite that over that top. The Bows are placed at the chest to give the illusion that they're holding the bodice closed, and the fabric flowers are relatively small and aren't placed at random- they're placed at gathered ruffles to give the effect of water lillies floating on rippling water.
(Oh and the bows at the sleeves- like the bows at the chest- they're also there almost playfully. No one would believe they're actually tying the sleeves closed, but it's a design element the designer chose to emphasize- instead of a small ribbon tying the sleeve, it's a big bow. It wasn't placed at random for the sheer sake of being there.
Eighteenth century fashion wasn't always as tacky as we've been lead to believe, and frankly it rarely was tacky at all! Also, remember, a lot of what people believe of eighteenth century fashion comes from illustrations in editorials that were making fun of the then current high fashion, playing up the silliness for humour. That drawing of Belle is about as historically researched and historically accurate as most other fanart based off eighteenth century fashion.)
>>8953183
I'd hazard a guess that the artist actually used that image in >>8953163 as a base given the zigzagging swags down the front and the lower ruffle edge. I'd give the faux roses a pass, they're an integral part of the character though I think I might have an extant example somewhere. Let me go through my files.
>>8953183
I didn't say that specific example had all of those elements. I said that big bows, flowers, and the "curtain ropes" were common themes in 1770s gowns. The "curtain ropes" are present. Look at the bottom of the dress. They not as exaggerated in the fashion plate because of the different styles of drawing. The Belle drawing exaggerates the fabric lines whereas the fashion plates are softer.
You're also comparing a gown from the 1756 with the 1770s style. "18th century fashion" is not one big conglomerate. And I'm confused that you think that Madame Pompadour gown is one of the most ostentatious of the 18th century... compared to the mid-to-late 1770s, it's practically a chemise a la reine.
It is 100000% accurate? No. But your comments regarding the details are unfounded. They are all details present in 1770s gowns, particularly court gowns. Some things are slightly off: the center rose is larger than it would have been back then, and it's edging more to modern symmetry than the symmetry you normally see in 1770s gowns, but that's nothing to chirp about.
>>8953208
There are a lot of dresses that had various flowers on them, they just weren't quite as big. It would have been more accurate to have a cluster of three smaller roses in place of each big rose. Even so, I don't know why they think they're "placed at random"? They're pretty obviously placed symmetrically, zig zagging down the dress.
>>8953208
Ok here we go. Silk flowers on a late 1700s gown.
Also I do agree with >>8953183 a bit on how things were exaggerated, but all the examples I'm gonna use now are ones that a girl in Belle's position (that is, a woman being courted by and eventually married to the prince) would have access to.
>>8953215
aaaand i dropped it. Also swags.
>>8953217
Self-fabric rosettes would be an acceptable replacement too I think.
Also I just like this one.
>>8953218
Although this is more of a visiting gown type, I think this effect would have been better than the swags personally. It looks wayyy more like the gown in the movie while still being period correct.
>>8953221
More small puff swags and sewn-in-place ruffled swags, plus yellow silk roses.
>>8953222
Some lovely examples, and thank you for all the pictures!
But again, note, all design elements are interconnected. Note that the flowers are subtle, and generally lead to another design elements.
At no point do you have a bow glued to the middle of a fabric, leading to or attaching to nothing. Likewise with the giant fake rose attached to the giant fake bow with giant curtain ropes hanging off them.
Also, no "curtain ropes" save for a rather unusual dress on a painting that was meant to highlight Marie Antoniettes larger than life quality, and even then they're subtle.
My point: that drawing is no more founded in historical accuracy than most drawings based on eighteenth century fashion. You want to use it because you like the design? Absolutely. But don't say you're doing it because it's more historically accurate than most other "rococo Disney princess" designs on deviantart.
>>8953222
Last post, I promise- note how the yellow roses attach to the swags which lead to the underskirt? Again, the name of the gamer is interconnecting your designs to create the illusion of a natural pattern
>>8953211
Wait, where are the curtain ropes?
>>8953183
The belle dress is almost a copy of the black dress, except the bows on the black dress are roses and there's a center bow with a rose on the skirt part in the belle version
>>8953334
Those curtain ropes are abundant in 18th century court dresses. Google them. I think you may need to get your monitor checked out because all the details are
>>8953334
>Also, no "curtain ropes" save for a rather unusual dress
The dress is not unusual. Those so-called ropes occur in numerous 1770s French court gowns.
>>8948438
>are onesies cosplay?
> that's literally what they wear
Holy fuck this is genius.
>>8953222
this dress is gorgeous.
Can we get back onto disney cosplay instead of 1700's fashion 101?
>picture more for the lolz character photos than cosplay accuracy
>>8953334
>Also, no "curtain ropes" save for a rather unusual dress on a painting that was meant to highlight Marie Antoniettes larger than life quality, and even then they're subtle.
So even though the gathered bunches appear on numerous fashion plates and paintings of the day, you're saying that because anon didn't post any surviving gowns with them, they didn't exist? I guess that means that there were no chemise a la reines with poofy sleeves, despite paintings and fashion plates to the contrary, because the handful of surviving chemise a la reines don't have them.
The Belle design is more historically accurate than most "rococo Disney princess" designs. For some reason, you seem to believe that if every single 18th century gown or fashion plate doesn't have all those details at the same time, it can't be accurate. It's already been pointed out that the details you have a problem with DO exist in 18th century gowns, and that some things are slightly exaggerated for sake of the character, like the roses. I mean, for goodness sake: the Belle dress is literally based on that black gown fashion plate, with some altered details, pose and all. Some slight exaggerations (larger and more realistic looking flowers, a larger bow in the center which it was said before, is more modern symmetry sensibility than 18th century) do not make it worth all your criticism, which at this point shows a lack of fundamental understanding of French court wear in the 1770s. All of these details can be found in 18th century court gowns.
