Old thread is saging
>>8805686
This thing showed up to an event in Austin and called herself a Harajuku Fashion Lolita. Before, she got offended by a few who told her what she wears wasn't Lolita or Harajuku fashion and won't shut up about how everyone in the fashion is bullies and wants to do Lolita her own way.
Dumping a few from the Tumblr tags
> uses they/them pronouns
> wears clothing that is categorized as feminine
Someone didn't get enough attention as a child
>>8816462
Despite the snowflake that has nothing to do with ita or not... I can't see enough of the outfit to judge. Try to keep up full coord shots anon!
>>8816467
Questionable shoe/tights choice, but I don't see anything overly ita about this.
All the elements of a good coord are there, but the fabric looks really costume-y.
>>8816473
Poorly fitting and frumpy, messy construction and loud colors. The materials aren't necessarily bad, but are too poor quality to be suitable for lolita.
>>8816462
This is an Ita thread not an 'I disagree with this person's lifestyle choices' thread. Fuck off with this
>>8816473
From the thumbnail, I thought this was going to be Tangled-inspired. Thank. Fuck. It's not that bad at least.
>>8816467
Nitpick at best
>>8816491
i-is part of her bra showing...?
Tagged as lolita fashion.
>>8816473
Bodice is fit terribly and the gathers in the bottom are just strange.
>>8816473
She tried hard
>>8816540
I think that's a lolita dress but yeah this outfit is definitely not lolita
>>8816540
I usually love this girl but this clearly isnt lolita... why tag it as such ?
>>8816473
If this were higher quality I'd really love it. You don't see a lot of brighter purples in lolita.
other than No.8816473
and ops pictures nothing here s really that ita sure their pretty mediocre coords but nothing really cringe
>>8816467
Mar here reminds me of Venus's bodyline pics.
>>8816473
If the fit alone was better, I'd like it more.
>>8816373
when was this? it's not delandra she moved but i live in austin and haven't seen this girl.
>>8816473
What is wrong with people saying they don't mind this? It looks like a low quality costume for a 5 year old
>>8816777
This post is "cringe"
Posted in Lolita Updates too. This is the second one this month, it is not the place for bloggy bullshit.
>>8816905
So edgy desu
>>8816910
CRINGEEEE
>>8816462
feminine doesnt mean female...
>>8816863
Not OP but she isn't from the area. She lives in San Antonio, which is an hour and a half drive from Austin. I'm in the same comm as her and her "cosplays" and "lolita" are cringy and it doesn't help she thinks she is top shit, especially in the cosplay community.
>>8816905
I came here to post this haha. She shits up the local comm every now and then with posts like "how do I make friends in lolita because I am anti social"
Not sure if ita handmade bonnet, or just bad picture. Hmmmm....
>>8816960
People calling themselves antisocial piss me off so much. No. You are Asocial, unless you have a hard time staying out of jail.
>>8816964
It's also my pet peeve, anon. It's used so much by the media too, which just goes to show that we should take everything they say with a grain of salt.
>>8816961
Nah man that's ita as fuck.
>>8816961
this is truly painful to look at
>>8816961
that mono brow is fearsome
>>8816961
Looks like an adult baby.
>>8816580
It's not a lolita dress either. Lurk moar.
>>8816467
Nice coord
>>8817173
Nope, never seen her at a meet. I think she's in the whole 'all lolitas are elitist bitches' mindset, and she seems too busy trying to mash together being a furry, buying cosplays, and wearing lolita into one weird mess. I think she's just too edgy for us, ha.
>>8817227
I thought we had the six month rule?
Yeah I get that vibe. But I'm glad we shot that dress down pretty hard.
Such a special snowflake.
I only know one other girl in our comm who posts here and I'm wondering if it's you.
>>8817194
Hem detailing, could clearly fit a petticoat, bodice detailing, girl is known for using lolita in casual outfits.
>>8816905
Thought we were doing the bjd thing again for a second there. My god that eye make up looks like paint
>>8817248
Anon you can't even see the bodice detail she's wearing a fucking cardigan
>>8817240
Thank goodness. There's at least five of us that I know of that post here, but you never know
>Here's a Doll Delight monstrosity to keep things on topic.
>>8816910
Is that a tacky satiny yolanda replica?
>>8816961
The only impact a certain someone who will not named made was clearly on itas
>>8816464
your right- the diamante cat ear headband, earmuffs and pink headband, plastic Claires jewelry, rib-jersey fabric top and anime badges aren't a strong enough indicator that this outfit could be ita.
>>8817253
You can clearly see it has some sort of lace up thing going on, I doubt there's just a bunch of string attached to the dress
>>8817254
Oh I only know three. But I can imagine who the others would be.
On topic. I just really don't like this.
>>8817274
Dropped my picture goddamn.
>>8817276
My poor poor eyes, wtf was she thinking?
> Horrible quality wig
> fucked up makeup
> those ears????
> the salopette doesn't fit on her at all, too short and sits at the wrong place
> the socks are too short for the short salopette and her horrible tattoos
> burn the shoes on this coord
>>8817258
Could is the operative word here, without a full body pic we'll never know. Also anons informing us of their special snowflake pronouns reeks of vendetta. Unless there is proof they dress like a train wreck they have no reason to be in the ita thread.
>>8817276
Camera angles man
>>8817276
now why does she have the that poor scalo on the tighter button. she knows she already cant fit into it and shes made it even worse.
>>8817281
>scalo
lol, i meant salo
>>8817277
>> the socks are too short for the short salopette
Agreed and they aren't even socks- they were Grimoire knock off tights which she turned into socks, which begs the question WHY?! because surely tights would have been better with a salopette? Maybe they were too short as well?
>>8817248
>could clearly fit a petticoat
Anon, have you ever even seen a dress with no petti? There should be way more gathers for it to be able to fit a lolita petticoat. Even my super low-poof Moitie has twice that amount of gathers.
>>8817276
oh fuck, for some reason she looks like she could be Nokecha's severely underdeveloped twin sister
that lived in a basement all her life
>>8816491
>bothers to wear duster over jsk
>doesn't wear a blouse
why
>>8817284
Oh shit I didn't even notice.
>>8817276
Her face, especially the one she makes on the right, is so fucking punchable.
>>8817263
Yeah because lace automatically equals lolita, lurk more newfag
Bleh
>>8817691
Those sad sad MP replicas
>>8817276
If she dropped the cat ears I don't think it would be too bad of a coord. Far from perfect but it wouldn't quite be ita. Didn't Infanta release some cat ears that matched that dress? She should get those instead.
>>8817691
we need JANITORS! this photo was stolen from a private album!
>>8817704
And you think they give a shit?
>>8817704
It's shitty to post private pictures but not against any rules on 4chan
>>8817704
Which one are you?
>>8817706
I wish they could take it down its not cool
>>8816503
The person in the back lmao
>>8817710
none
>>8817704
>Internet
>private
You can't have both now and days. If its up, it's all game.
>>8817704
You moron, it wasn't "stolen". Someone with access to it posted it. One of your friends is a cunt. You don't need janitors you need to reassess your friendships.
>>8817710
this was their first meet, give em a break
>>8817754
No. They need to learn. I was much better dressed for my first meet because I took the time to learn and do research.
>>8817766
they had these things before they even joined the comm, we have mentors that are helping newbies. They'll get better, everybody starts someplace jc
>>8817784
That doesn't excuse them for doing basic research before the meetup to at least know how to pick out correct pieces so everything looks coherent and decent.
>>8817795
would love to see your first coord research lord
>>8817800
There are too many resources available for new lolitas that there is literally no excuse for being ita except a lack of giving a fuck
>>8817254
But but anon, it's not lolita, it's "dolly fashion"
*rolls eyes*
>>8817254
I have no idea why, but I think of Phi Phi O'Hara every time I see DollDelight.
>>8817800
Little shits like you make me wanna self post my first coord to show how simple research goes far yet i know i will get flack for it
>>8816503
holy shit, she wore that clusterfuck to the school WHYYY
>>8817276
that Yumi King's chinless face makes me gag
>>8817699
wtf are you talking about? Nothing matches
>>8818057
I don't think this is ita. She needs to iron and her face is unfortunate, that's all.
>>8818039
I'm more worried about that she wore it to school in what seems to be RUSSIA.
If it's not the cryllic alphabet on the sign in the background, please correct me.
>>8818070
sure is, it says 'information' on the big background thing and there's an emergency exit sign.
not sure what you're worried about tho, it's not like Russia = Somalia or what have you
>>8818068
those socks
those shoes
that thing hanging of her head
the books
>>8818070
>I'm more worried about that she wore it to school in what seems to be RUSSIA
You should be more worried about those daily school shootings you've got going on. Russia's golden by comparison.
>>8818080
The deeper pink in the socks isn't good, but it's not ita level.
Nothing is wrong with the shoes. Why do you say that?
She embellished her headbow weirdly, but it's not awful.
Her standing on books has nothing to do with her coord.
I think this is more of a nitpick than ita. In my opinion itas spectacularly fuck up everything. Feel free to disagree.
>>8818057
this isn't ita, it's barely even nitpick
>>8818057
With blue or white shoes, it would be better. Not bad though
>>8816503
Is it bad that i think if she tea dyed that bright white trim edge to match the flowers and ditched the choker and cat ears for something understated I'd kinda like this?
>>8816540
it's not ita its just wrongly tagged, i believe the dress is Jane Marple actualy.
>>8818057
Is she standing on a bible?.
>>8818279
I think so, yeah
>>8816467
Meh nitpick at most, its not ita. I like it for a more casual look. Thought i dont like the pearls much and some headwear or hairstyle would look better.
>>8817691
You're the fat one aren't you?
>>8818057
not ita she would just need som more poof and white or sax shoes.
>>8818084
wait, isnt the blond one on the front row princess peculiar from youtube?
>>8817704
Do a friend purge.Just get rid of anyone you'd expect that'd do this. Some people are just shitty and think private albums are the same as dA or tumblr.
>>8817883
I'm so glad that I am not the only one.
>>8818637
The fatty in twinkle journey, her boobs look pained.
>>8818637
come on yall where's the ita?
>>8818671
a half corset is suppossed to cover tits?
>>8818686
i think it's an under bust desperately trying to strangle her
>>8818736
besides the cat ears this isn't really anything anon.
>>8818671
Why am i getting frozen vibes from this thing?
>>8818724
You would be correct. I can say for a fact that her proportions are ill suited for it.
>>8818822
Because you should, it looks like a Russian Anna cosplay
>>8818918
Now that's what I call ita.
>>8818084
I always feel upset when I see photos like this posted to this thread. Not because they aren't ita as fuck, but because they look like they're having so much fun together.
sage for ot
>>8818637
Vendetta. they all look fine. Most are just fat, but their coords are fine.
>>8818936
I've never seen a human being look so much like Eeyore.
>>8818936
This is from a fashion show where a designer who sometimes designs lolita was showing her gothic and steampunk stuff. The show was in a goth club and so the models and everything were styled accordingly - it's not meant to be a lolita coord.
>>8818929
This looks like a first coord, not ita.
>>8818637
fuck off vendetta chan
>>8818671
I can almost see what she was going for, I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse
>>8818736
nitpick, change the headress and lose the coat.
>>8818924
did she glue springs to the waist bow?
>>8818929
from what can be seen this is nitpick. All she needs is a proper blouse and a headdress
>>8818918
Isn't that a vocaloid cosplay?
>>8819304
sorry I have no idea wtf happened
>>8816573
>she
>>8818055
Outfit isn't really ita at all... She has a very unfortunate face but it could be better if she posed better and did decent makeup. Other than that the lack of petti is pretty bad.
>>8819295
No, that's just some ita on shitty Luka wig.
I can't quite decide if this outfit is ita enough for the thread. But the posing is making me cringe like crazy haha
>>8818671
The fur thing looks like a travel neck pillow
>>8819305
Is it bad that I actually kind of like the girl on the right's outfit? I mean, not for lolita, ofc, but I think it would be a cool costume for an event or something. Very saloon girl-esq.
>>8819326
The black girl could be so cute with a major overhaul in style.
>her legs
sage for ot.
>>8819376
Nah, I'm kinda digging it for a night out or something too.
>>8818920
Then go back to tumblr
>>8819326
This makes me really sad, all three of them are super cute except for the clothes. Somebody please help them
>>8817699
Gtfo
>>8818645
more like twinkie journey
>>8817227
Browsing this thread with the bf. He says "why does she have a chimney on here head?" Refering to the one visible neko ear.
>>8818990
it's.... 300 dollars on easy....
>>8819325
Was there ever a moment when Victoria Suzanne didn't look questionable? Too preoccupied with her super speshul super unique pink hair to think up decent coordinates.
It's been so long since she was last relevant, jeez.
>>8816373
Please tell me she's wearing some kind of white apron thing over a yellow/red striped skirt and that isn't actually her underwear showing
>>8817279
The special snowflake pronouns are right there in the picture, though. Anon just pointed them out.
>>8818057
>those squished tiddies
>>8816373
Found this pic of the OP picture. She has an unfortunate face and the wig doesn't help it.
>>8819376
>*-esque
And yeah you should feel kind of bad unless you have very bad eyesight and can only see a vague silhouette or something. She looks like she jumped into the costume bin of a shitty neighborhood's thrift store and wore whatever stuck.
>>8816373
>>8819668
I saw this girl at Anime Austin Launch Party this past weekend. She was so loud and obnoxious and kept speaking broken japanese. I feel bad for the girl she kept following around at the beginning of the event, she looks really uncomfortable.
Praying for anyone who is going to Miku Expo in Dallas since she aparrently won tickets to it.
>>8819668
Oh good, it's some ugly faded bed sheet print and not her underwear showing through. Phew.
>>8817240
What is six month rule?
>>8818938
typical old school ita. I've missed this
>>8819688
I would assume it's that you shouldn't post the same picture (or repost) until six months since you saw it/last posted it
>>8816467
She looks like she could pass for Pam's sister from The Office but her outfit doesn't look bad at all.
>>8818960
Not that anon but
How does not wanting boobs because it's like a foreign object on one's body correlate to daddy issues?
>>8819305
Ita jackpot.
Where is this from anon?
>>8818057
I don't even care about her outfit, can someone please help this girl's teeth?
>>8819305
Where is this from. Girl on the right looks a lot like someone i went to college with.
>>8817215
friendly reminder that this is tim.
>>8819766
I actually think shes really sexy
>>8819681
Sorry that this is OT, but how was that launch party? I'm actually really pleased to see a new con emerging in Austin but couldn't make it out last weekend.
>>8818975
Sorry but can you explain the correlation?
>>8818999
There's history of cancer in my family so I might go for it anyway. Cheers!
>>8819431
I didn't know a website cures mental illness! Holy shit thanks Anon!
Also been here since before Tumblr was a thing. Fuck off you cunt.
>>8819803
dysphoria is a serious mental illness, but having breast dysphoria has nothing to do with gender or pronouns.(being trans is more than just dysphoria) you didn't need to add that because no1curr and you're being an attention whoring brat.
I know this isnt a conventional 'ita' picture, but its certainly painful...
>>8817254
All that great construction wasted on this mess. DD would already have a booming lolita brand by now if she wasn't so ~special~
yes, I mad
>>8819832
>Sissies
>that Bodyline JSK was my first piece
This hurt my soul.
>>8819882
At least the dress is cute enough to make him fuckable.
>>8816473
I couldnt look beyond the face
>glassed over eyes
>crooked nose
>huge chin
>>8819981
He doesn't have to be a sissy. Id let him do me however he pleases as long as he dresses like that while hes doing it.
>>8819832
Sissies, dd/lg sickos, and other gross people steal non sexual photos of lolitas and other girls in jfash all the time. See pic related. Found it in the sissy tag on tumblr
>tfw she's 22
>i coorded better than that at 14
>she can't even put her wrinkly cheap skirt right
And she said she wants to own Dolly Cat...Gosh, it rustles my jimmies to see that. She can't even coord some basic bitch bodyline print.
How some girls coord SO badly is beyond me really.
>>8817276
This is terrible and tacky and the camera angles are making me uncomfortable but damn, the cat paws straps are adorable.
>>8819688
In our comm you need to attend a meet at least once every six months.
We used to be a pretty small and tight comm. But there's been an influx of itas and "I've been a lolita for years but it's expensive so I don't own any uwu" so the rule was designed to help weed them out.
>>8817276
She's wearing her shoe straps wrong... She has the buckles towards the inside instead of the outside, wtf.
>>8819580
Who is this anon? I've only been around for 2 ish years and found the image in a random flicker album. I love to know about ancient dramus
>>8820163
pretty sure anyone can make that mistake anon
>>8820193
>>8820193
this looks like a sitcom promo
>>8816960
6000 likes on her page wtf lol
>>8820284
i wonder how much those cost
>>8819991
Isn't this the girl who was murdered? That's really low to use a pic of her, given the situation.
>>8820298
girl who was murdered?
>>8820298
Thats lani you idiot. She's alive and well.
>>8816467
Not ita,maybe nit pick
>>8819832
I hate Stefonknee so much. I'm so pissed that she's started using the word "brolita" and I'm so scared that we're going to have a creepier Canadian brolitajenny on our hands one of these days.
>>8820368
>she
Don't encourage him.
>>8820119
>implying flats are uncomfortable
>>8820348
why? Just why?
>>8820185
May the odds be in your favor!
>>8816491
Why is she standing like that....
Anyway, she looks new (I hope she is). She seems like she can improve over time if people give her enough con-crit and advice.
>>8820193
This wins. Show is over. Everybody can go home now.
some vintage ita for y'all
>>8820786
I wish I could find the picture of the bodice. All of that beautiful dramu has been deleted now, though.
>>8820786
Is this the lady who was going on about getting gastric bypass or something?
>>8818099
Jesus. I can't unsee it now.
>>8820786
ah yes. This woman infuriated me. At the time she was much larger than me but still somehow managed to shove herself into my favorite dress that I myself couldn't fit into without ripping it. FUCKING. HOW?
I have lost so much fucking weight and I still can't zip the stupid thing up without someone holding it together for me around bust level. I AM SO FUCKING ANGRY STILL HOLY SHIT, I FORGOT.
I came here for some help with cosplay and got stuck in this thread and jesus you girls are more vicious than the rest of 4chan, it's goddamn fantastic.
>>8816961
Reminds me of Girlyhoot makeup
>>8820864
Anon, doesn't she have the skirt though? Maybe it's different sizing. It looks like a skirt to me.
I was looking for something on tumblr and stumbled upon this mess.
>>8820069
Did she tie the waistties in front and put the waistbow on her head? Yikes.
I hope she never gets Dolly Cat.
>>8821004
Nope, that's the JSK. She also posted pic related which shows the incredibly strained seams on the bodice.
>>8821086
*OP, not JSK. Sorry, my bad.
>>8820119
>>8820486
>implying flats are "beautiful"
Why the fuck does casual mean throwing on some random normie shit on for some people. You're just gonna end up looking like a 5-year old or a mad woman.
Just choose simpler items that still fit the style, a cardigan with a little bit of lace, small heels with a bow detail, IDK. It's not that hard to look cohesive, jeez.
>>8821007
Where can I get that skirt though
>>8820368
>she
Anon pls no. This is a man in his fifties who gets off on dressing up as a little girl - actual mtf people would never use the term "sissy" and wouldn't consider themselves a brolita. He's using the trans label to make himself untouchable and get SJWs in his side just like Melissa did.
Poor Canadian lolitas, having to put up with this creep. I hope he never comes to a meet.
>>8820786
Didn't she wear this to her husband's niece's birthday party even though he asked her not to? Oh, pinkzombies. How I miss her and her ita creations that she for some reason never wore herself...
>>8817254
I am only a casual delver into lolita, and have lurked the fashions for about 10 years now and lemme just say you bitches are nitpick and hypocritical as fuck to give this look shit.
What exactly is your complaint here, oh wise loli-gurus? Literally the only thing I can see is that she doesn't have anything to cover her clavicle. You bitches need some perspective into the history and foundation of the movement before you start shitting on stuff thats NOT MY RORITA DESU.
>>8821132
Try harder next time, and maybe pick a better example. Doll Delight is shit, and pretty much everyone agrees.
>>8821135
can you articulate to someone who isn't part of your insulated circle-jerk as to what is actually out of place (for a lolita fashion) that can't be applied to most lolita?
>muh board culture says doll delight is shit!
I don't know or care about that brand, but that picture is not in the slightest bit ita. You guys sound like the very people that are insulting lolita in general. I am not saying you have to like that coord or whatever, but don't post it in an ita thread and start circle-jerking and expect not to get called out.
>>8820864
i dont think its a weight thing, i think its a boob size and type of bra thing. have you tried a sports bra or a binder? she might be wearing a type of flattening bra or just simply has smaller boobs then you.
>>8821141
By DollDelight standards that dress actually isn't that bad. The design and construction both look fine but like practically everything DD makes, the fabric choice ruins it. It's not as obvious here but I'm sure that if we got to see the print up close it would be a mess. I will never understand this girl's taste in fabrics.
Aside from that and the fact that her shoes are at least two sizes too big, this one actually isn't that horrible. People just have a gut 'oh honey no' reaction to DD because she normally churns out monstrosities like pic related.
>>8821146
>by dolldelight standards it isn't that bad
It's still ita by any other standard, though. The sleeves and skirt really kill this, imo.
Everything she makes looks like a milanoo nightmare with slightly better but equally weird construction.
>fabric and trim choices
>weird construction details
>those sleeves and shoes
Also, why does she wear lenses that make her eyes look like soulless black pits?
>>8821141
If you think this is "good" or even okay lolita, you have no understanding of what lolita is.
>>8819832
oh god
please tell me this guy hasn't joined the toronto comm on fb yet
>>8821151
You have no real criticism other than
>this I just NO
>ugh I dont like this either
WHY is it not lolita? Why does it not work? I can understand >>8821146 point because I don't know about this particular brand and was just going by the image. I can believe they probably are usually sub-par.
>you have no understanding of what lolita is.
little girl I was in the community before you had your first period. I may not be a deep diver into the subculture but I do keep up with trends in magazines and lemme tell that, THAT coord is miles ahead of the kind of shit that was popular not very long ago.
I know some of you girls are autistic, and follow your math of;
Jumper (vetted brand) + Blouse (vetted brand) + tights&shoes (vetted brand) + matching accessories released with Jumper pattern = Solid & Safe good lolita fashion
Woe betide anything that doesn't fit your (ageing and dying) traditions or, since Burandos are 80% of your game, a company you don't like.
Grow up and learn to like things, you guys are making lolita incredibly boring and its the same shitty prints, styles, and coords year-in-year out.
>>8819326
I think those are Halloween costumes
>>8821007
I like it somehow. I would be fine without that weird shirt thing over her blouse, with not transparent tights and with a headdress.
>>8821132
It's more of a nitpick but
>weird fabric choice
>really busy print
>sleeves are too opulent for the rather simple skirt
>bows on bodice clashing with print
>lace on tiers of skirt doesn't look good
>shoes don't match at all
>shoes are way to 'casual j-fash' for OTT classic coord
Not really ita, but really nitpick. I like the construction of the bodice though. The coord ist just really unbalanced.
>>8821162
not the anon you're replying to, but if you can't see how dolldelight's designs are terrible it's not just a matter of you not understanding lolita but also having a general lack of sense of style
>using too many clashing patterns
>clashing colours
>busy print+busy design
>messy design/construction
>>8821162
You honestly sound like one of those retards who think that ~le brandwhores~ hate good indie and handmade.
DD isn't disliked because she's not a major "vetted" brand; it's because what she produces looks like shit, from a lolita or normie fashion perspective.
Also, no matter how much you keep flaunting ~how many years~ you've been spectating the fashion, your newness (or total inability to grasp basic concepts) is showing.
>>8821162
>claims to have been into lolita since the ice age
>BRANDWHORES!!!!!
fucking seriously? You don't need to be a brandwhore to be able to see that DD is shit.
>>8821162
So you have been researching this fashion for years and you still have poor aesthetic sense?
What a waste.
>>8820186
Im losing my shit over that microscopic lips
>>8821162
Isaki, stop
>>8820789
f-fruits parlor....
