[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Hey i want to learn more about prehistoric mammals. Specifically
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /an/ - Animals & Nature

Thread replies: 33
Thread images: 9
File: b2.jpg (46 KB, 400x373) Image search: [Google]
b2.jpg
46 KB, 400x373
Hey i want to learn more about prehistoric mammals. Specifically the ones that came after dinosaurs and before human Beings took over the world.It saddens me how little stuff there is on them compared to the dinosaurs.just any documentaries,websites or videos that would teach me a lot about the amazing animals during those times. thank you for your help. Also another small question. i was obsessed with "Walking with Prehistoric beasts" when i was younger and i just recently rewatched it but how accurate is it. because i heard that walking with dinosaurs and other prehistoric shows or movies often have a lot of problems.
>>
>>2030147
walking with prehistoric beasts but a lot of smaller details are incorrect or new evidence has invalidated it like for example Gastornis was most likely a herbivore rather a then carnivore
>>
there isn't much on them because they're extremely boring.
>>
>>2030147
bugguy's right.
the public doesn't have much interest in Cenozoic mammals, so there isn't much out there in the form of videos aimed at adults.

Scientists are the opposite, they're way more interested in mammals than in dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals. There's probably 20 times more scientific articles on extinct mammals than there are on any other group of animals.

It doesn't get much more boring than reading scientific papers though. It's like drowning slowly in lukewarm vanilla pudding while listening to news about british golfing tournaments.
>>
>>2030147
>>2030264
Question: are large birds like in OPs pic regarded as theropods?
>>
File: mammal-like-reptiles-2.jpg (229 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
mammal-like-reptiles-2.jpg
229 KB, 1920x1080
>>2030271
our ancestors were pretty much just a bunch of retarded rats and guinea pigs.

no one wants to see that.
>>
>>2030923
yes, all birds are theropods.
>>
>>2030252
What is that based on? I'm genuinely interested.

Because when I look at a large bird like that with a large sharp beak, I'm thinking hunter right off the bat. Might just be some retarded shit like when scientists were saying that T. Rex might have been a scavenger. Give me a break.
>>
>>2030271
Nice analogy
Made me laugh
>>
File: Cassowary_withChick.jpg (59 KB, 500x403) Image search: [Google]
Cassowary_withChick.jpg
59 KB, 500x403
>>2030929
>Because when I look at a large bird like that with a large sharp beak, I'm thinking hunter right off the bat.
thats not how it works.
>>
>>2030929
looks like the most compelling evidence is from c12/c13 isotope studies of bone. Because certain carbon isotopes accumulate in meat but aren't common in plants we can tell what an animal ate by counting the isotopes ratio in their bones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gastornis#Diet
>>
>>2030927
Ah thanks
>>
>>2030939
it was my privilege.
>>
File: Andrewsarchus-1.jpg (150 KB, 1024x680) Image search: [Google]
Andrewsarchus-1.jpg
150 KB, 1024x680
Check these guys out OP. They're pretty boss prehistoric mammalian predators.
>>
File: andrewsarchus.jpg (31 KB, 494x286) Image search: [Google]
andrewsarchus.jpg
31 KB, 494x286
>>2030947
I like the dinosaur tail coming out of his ass.
>>
Why did big predatory birds lose out to other land dwelling predators like wolves, cats and bears?
>>
>>2030925
I think synapsids are pretty neat
>>
>>2031005
they just got phased out slowly environmental stress probably put the nail in the coffin for them with Titanis being the last one in the early Plesitocene but hey the terror birds did do a lot better then the Sebecosuchids and Sparassodonts
>>
>>2030252
>>2030929
>>2030938
I'm not convinced it was 100% herbivorous. I can believe it mostly but even ostriches and cassowaries eat meat. Most cranes too. Hell I even bet moas wouldn't pass up on something small they could catch.
>>
>>2031700
>I'm not convinced it was 100% herbivorous.
nothing is 100% herbivorous
that isn't a requirement for being an herbivore
>>
>>2030925
Cynognathus has that "i'm gonna fuck someone up" look.
>>
>>2030147
There's actually quite a few documentaries out there on prehistoric mammals, albeit they're often on the same species :/ You can find a lot of them on YouTube like the Extinct (2001) TV series, Prehistoric Predators (2007), What Killed The Mega Beasts? (2002) and Monsters We Met (2004).
>>
>>2030934
Yeah bro because cassowaries have large round beaks the size of your thick skull.
>>
>>2032482
you may not like his example but he's absolutely right.

Gastornis was long thought to be a predator based on the beak. But molecular evidence killed that interpretation. When someone's guess based on morphology disagrees with solid molecular evidence, the guess loses.
>>
>>2031700
Its diet probably consisted mainly of plant materal (Fruits, nuts, seeds, other such material) but i doubt it would have passed up the odd insect or grub, or carrion for that matter.
>>
File: DromornisPeterTrusler.jpg (210 KB, 1023x745) Image search: [Google]
DromornisPeterTrusler.jpg
210 KB, 1023x745
>>2032496
For example, Dromornis stirtoni from Australia was thought to be a large carnovorious hunter, but is now thought to be a slower moving herbovore or omnivore, with a strong hardy beak used for crushing hard fruits or nuts.
But i doubt it would have turned its beak up at carrion or other foods like it.
>>
>>2032500
Excuse my horrid spelling
>>
>>2030929
well phorusrhacids were carnivorous and so were the dromornithids
>>
File: Atopodenatus.jpg (84 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]
Atopodenatus.jpg
84 KB, 960x960
>>2030147
hmmm non dinosaur prehistoric thread... yes non dinosaur prehistoric thread
post the prehistoric monsters if ya got em
>>
>>2033686
>non dinosaur prehistoric thread
>almost entire thread is about dinosaurs
>>
File: 5053331106_89592a95c5_b.jpg (596 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
5053331106_89592a95c5_b.jpg
596 KB, 1024x768
paraceratherium
>>
File: 1449019390180.jpg (286 KB, 1174x1500) Image search: [Google]
1449019390180.jpg
286 KB, 1174x1500
my fav aerial predator
>>
>>2030934
>fuck you lookin at, bitch nigga?
Thread replies: 33
Thread images: 9

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.