The two lineages of Amniotes have been fighting for dominance for over 300 million years.
Have the synapsids finally won with the Human?
I mean, sure, diapsids had the dinosaurs, but can they even compare to humans?
Non-amniotes need not apply.
>>2019861
there is no doubt humans have won for the moment.
time will tell, but that situation probably won't last.
>>2019867
Unless there is something that will knock us off all at once, then we'll just adapt to it with what we got. We would have to be down to a ridiculously low number in a bad environment for us not to explode again.
>>2019871
Birds fly. That's sort a massive advantage over everything. Them being 'less vulnerable' really depends on what you're talking about. Disease is something that spreads very quickly between social birds, such as avian cholera which even just this year it had 2000 snow geese dropping dead out of the sky from it.
>>2019861
give it another 20 million years
Archaeum here, multicellularity is for fags
Making up 20% of the world's biomass is enough for now, we'll rule the world once an asteroid extinguishes all life on the surface
We're just biding our time
>>2019959
They have curved sticks CURVED STICKS
>Non-amniotes need not apply.
Fine, we didn't want to be apart of your stupid discussion anyway.
>>2019917
I think recent studies have shown Archaeum might actually be ancestral to Eukaryotes.
In a broad sense, Eukaryotes are advanced Archaeum who are endosymbionts with bacteria close to Rickettsia and/or Cyanobacteria.
>>2020411
Get lost then, grandpa.
>>2019861
I wouldn't even say synapsids vs diapsids
Mammals vs Archosaurs would probably be more accurate.
>>2019867
If we're going down, evert hung is coming with us
