When I was on Tinder I would systematically go through all girls who I haven't spoken to in a month or two. My girlfriend is one of those girls who I re-messaged twice lol. I even told her about my Tinder tendencies.

I loved the old Tinder where you could create groups of people. I would have "whores who don't respond", "maybe dtf" and a "fucked" group

>>17333822
Sounds like a cool feature. I've had some girls whom i have messaged months after we matched, and they all just stop responding randomly. The ones i've managed to fuck i messaged right after we matched.

I just think it's weird, like of there's some psychology behind it.

>>17333847

I think it has to do with the way women use the app compared to men. In general, women want a relationship while men want sex. There are exceptions but in general this is the case. It's very possible that the women you matched with months ago have found a boyfriend. You also have to remember that for every girl you match with, she matches with 10 other guys.

Tinder is a numbers game so I've found it best to approach it systematically.

>>17333881
Whatever. Just message her dude, we are acting like you have something to lose.

>>17333802

Just message her, something semi-witty like "do you still think I'm hot?" can work

>>17333802
There's literally no reason not to. It won't even be embarrassing as it might be IRL.

File: 918645.gif (3 MB, 640x266) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 640x266

>>17333905
>"do you still think I'm hot?"
My sides...