How about you start by posting a picture of yourself as well so we can you where to go faggot
>>17332684
Unless you have absolutely no self respect, you don't achieve it. You tell him to fuck right off. Why the fuck would you want to look like his ex?
>>17332684
Sounds like he isn't over her and you're just a rebound.
What a terrible body goal.
>>17332694
I just know he likes the runners body although I am built more for weightlifting.
>>17332684
Well you could always get photoshop like the girl in the photo did or, has self respect and tell your bf to guck off or just go fuck his ex.
The former is easier, but the latter is more respectable.
You can't just have a body like that, only plastic surgery, Photoshop, or god genetics.
>>17332702
Do you really think that lady's body is a
>runners body
Just how fat are you?
>>17332684
Major red flag, don't entertain any of that shit. Extremely disrespectful to you.
Body type posted is atrocious, far as I'm concerned.
It's up to you if you want to mold yourself to other people's desire (to match his ex no less). I'd say it's a waste of your life. If you're overweight I can advice on that though, not that you'll actually follow it.
>>17332714
I'm 240. I feel like I am not that big mostly muscle from walking and weightlifting. I know Its not a runners physique in that picture but I want something similar.
>>17332724
>240
>not that big
Picture
Now
>>17332730
This
Also don't let your man tell you what to be.
>>17332684
Why did he even considered you when he was fucking that?
Why would somebody downgrade this much?
>>17332746
Pretty sure that's a pic of a pornstar bro.
>>17332730
Like I said I am fat but not that big. I can lift 100 pounds.
>>17332775
In my honest opinion I think you could lose some body fat, you said you lifted, are you trying to be a heavy lifter? If not that then why would you need high body fat?
>>17332783
I am ok with loosing weight I need to, but I would like a more hourglass shape so I was wondering if there's any real exercises that could get me to here.
THIS IS NOW A THICC THREAD
>>17332798
>>17332789
Are you really that clueless to think that there's a special exercise or diet plan that will give you an hourglass shape? You just need to loose weight - burn more calories than you're consuming and you'll see results.
Also, why change your appearance for him? Do it for yourself. I'm a former fatty and I lost weight for the wrong reasons and I feel like shit because of it. You've got to want this for yourself to actually make it work successfully in the longterm.
>>17332808
It was no bait anon, I mean...
>Holy shit I am fucking fat what should I do about it!
You can stop eating less and exercising properly.
>>17332724
I'm 160 at 6 feet and I lift. You've got 80 pounds on me in a woman's body and claim it's most muscle (a signifcant amount from walking apparently).
>>17332775
Thanks for proving your delusion. Got to /fit/
>>17332809
I have tried everything...that's why I am on here...
>>17332809
>burn more calories than you're consuming and you'll see results.
This implicitly buys into the "energy balance" concept, which more or less says weight is all about calories in vs calories out. This has been known as false for decades and is a disingenuous campaign created by thinktanks and pushed by front groups food large (junk) food manufacturers. It made its way into standardized school nutritional programs so they could brainwash kids into believing "you can eat whatever garbage you want, as long as you get moving! Stay active and work it off!"
It doesn't work that way, and you can't try to view the human body as a thermodynamic system. I'm just putting it out there, it's about content as much as it is quantity. If this isn't accepted and understood, any weight loss efforts are bluntly a waste of time and you shouldn't even bother. You will only ravage your body then return where you started.
>>17332789
I'm sorry Op that isn't really possible unless you were born with it. If you are really serious about achieving some form like this I suggest corset training. Though if you do get into it make sure to study a lot as it can be dangerous if not done right.
>>17332828
Wow, I'm impressed that you managed to take a break from fighting the patriarchy to write that absolute load of horse shit.
10/10 bait, here's your (you)
>>17332828
Calories in/calories out applies no matter the quality of the food, dingleberry. You can't gain weight consuming fewer calories than your body needs to maintain its weight.
>>17332824
Try cutting out carbohydrates, that's what I did and I've currently lost 28 kilos. It won't work for everyone but it's worth trying OP.
>>17332848
>Wow, I'm impressed that you managed to take a break from fighting the patriarchy
This just indicates you don't understand what I said, and took it to be some feminist / pro obesity nonsense.
>to write that absolute load of horse shit.
I'm only interested in a realistic and accurate framework to model how the universe and the machines it creates work. You might not know enough to see it, but I do. If OP wants results, they need to understand.
>10/10 bait, here's your (you)
Not bait. And for whatever reason 4chan disables the inline extension on /adv/, which while it gives it a different flow and feel, is obnoxious to use and does not afford me even a single (You).
>>17332838
Even with corset training, you can't fix your bone structure. I have wide hips like OP pic and no matter how much weight I lose , I'll never look thin. I got down to 13% body fat and still wore size 28 (US 6? maybe ) jeans. Whereas most people can have a nice flat butt and tiny legs with much more body fat. Rectangular girls who corset train will not have the same look, they get a pudge at the bottom even if they're fairly small, and will always have chicken legs. Lifting can only do so much lol
>>17332850
Now ask yourself what "weight" is, what puts it in adipose, how it's retrieved, and what the actually does when it's running a major calorie deficit and most of its adipose is white. That's right, it can't maintain your blood glucose levels, you can't regenerate liver or muscular glycogen, and since you're in such shit shape you probably have a degree of insulin resistance anyway.
Yes, you won't magically gain weight if you're losing more mass than you're taking in, but it's not a good weight loss strategy. Also, your maintenance requirement is somewhat variable, and it's easy to potentiate a given "calorie" ending up mainly in adipose if you rely heavily on fructolysis, or are consuming certain herbicides that inhibit signalling pathways that down the line lead to potentiating, again, shit ending up in adipose.
It is not a complicated picture, but it is a large one. Do not oversimplify, and do not give people the wrong idea about the actual mechanics. This shit could be so simple if you'd all just let go. Besides, you can't just eat a lot and "work it off" anyway. That's not how nutrient metabolism works.
>>17332828
>>17332858
>I'm only interested in a realistic and accurate framework to model how the universe and the machines it creates work.
>calories in/out is wrong
You can't truly be this fucking deluded, right?
>>17332684
Let me guess, you're a petite white girl?
>>17332862
>no matter how much weight I lose ill never look thin
All this delusion is overwhelming.
>>17332877
Read the thread before replying, nigger
>>17332828
>>17332876
>Wants to play physicist
>Views a thermodynamic system with a naive and severely oversimplified model of its I/O
Come on man, just stop. Internal mechanics of a system matter, as does its actual loss and gain relative to its surroundings.
Theoretically you can sit there and starve to death and not meaningfully lose any weight, and there isn't a goddamn thing you or your body can do about. That's how machines work, they have finite capabilities and are slave to physics.
>>17332872
It is that simple. People who fail at calories in/calories out are simply eating more than they should because they have no self control. Yes, it's a useless weigh to gauge health, but that's irrelevant.
>>17332885
I'm the only one giving OP real advice that will last long term, everyone says I'm baiting. Par for the course I guess.
All you experts out there, do yourself a favor. Look into a simple one, sucrose absorption and metabolism. I'll give a hint. An enzyme in the small intestine splits it in half, and it's rapidly transported across the intestinal wall. Glucose is used normally (look into what "normally" means), fructose goes through fructolysis in the liver. Learn about these processes and rethink your positions.
OP if you want to lose weight, and you want it, I can give you some simple guidelines to follow with a few of my own supplementary tips. Otherwise I'm going to go.
>>17332862
I was thinking that for more of the smaller waist look, I know there is no way to change bone structure, I know well since I'm an extreme pear shape, my ass and thighs are the only places I really gain weight. I feel ya on the not having thin legs, even when I was really underweight my legs were still pretty big, but anyways.
Sometimes you just have to accept your body's shake. Lose the weight for your health still OP, if you are Apple/rectangle you have higher risk of certain diseases at higher weight than other body shapes. And still, I think you should really re-think how much your bf respects you for him to ask what he did. It doesn't sound healthy
>>17332889
> Internal mechanics of a system matter
Not as much as you claim.
>meaningfully
That is why you eat under maitnance, faggot, and not fucking starve.
>>17332775
You may not be obese, but you're pretty big, and a loooong way from either model you posted. No bully.
1. Green tea all day erry day.
2. Cardio in mornings.
3. Lay off the carbs. You don't need to do keto, but you do need to lay off the rolls, pasta, and refined stuff and sweet stuff. You're done with ice cream and cookies, sorry.
4. Either a salad or some type of veggie smoothie before every meal. You don't have to have *just* veggies, but you do need to have them first, no exceptions. Get your veggies in every meal. GET YOUR VEGGIES IN EVERY MEAL. Veggies = non starchy things (e.g., a potato is not a veggie).
This may seems like it sucks. It will, at times. But then again, your body right now sucks, too. If you don't want to do this, fine, stay fat then.
>>17332901
OP don't listen to this guy, he's fucking crazy.
>>17332897
>Because they have no self control.
No. At least not entirely. Leptin is produced by fat cells, and it signals hunger. The moment your blood sugar begins to drop, fat cells release leptin. The more fat cells you have, the more hungry you become when you shouldn't be. There are other signalling hormones that behave similarly. Fructose in particular, also, severely delays the blood sugar elevation, which causes more eating short term. Fat people also have more histamine in their body, which also regulates feeding behaviors in mammals.
The lack of self control comes in when people are made aware of this, or recognize they need to change, but don't have the will. Which yes, is very common.
>>17332901
>advice that will last long term
Eat vegetables and poultry. Quit over complicating this, dumbass.
>>17332901
>i need to seem more credibly so i'm going to dust off my notes from medical terminology and AP1
you suggested in an earlier post that calories in vs calories out is some sort of conspiracy theory and it has no basis in science.
yes, a calorie isn't just a calorie. it's not as simple as some are making it out to be but to suggest that surplus caloric intake isn't the primary reason for weight gain is fucking retarded.
>>17332925
>you suggested in an earlier post that calories in vs calories out
No, I said the "energy balance" concept, which is based around calories in vs calories out, is a conspiracy theory. Though calories in vs calories out on its own is so flawed I'd probably say anyone advocating it on its own is being disingenuous and might as well be part of a conspiracy.
>but to suggest that surplus caloric intake isn't the primary reason for weight gain
That was never suggested. I said content is as much or more important than quantity, especially long term.
>>17332923
The lack of self control comes in when they know should eat less but don't. You've got your head way up your ass.
>>17332940
Don't say what I said like you're saying it.
- the reason you do not consider yourself big is because you are shorter than average.
- melissa debling doesn't have a runner' body. she is well known for being fat. pic related.
- from your selfie you have noticeable excess fat deposits therefore you are fat. you're not just chubby you are big. this isn't me talking shit this is the truth and you cannot be in denial with this.
- it doesn't matter if you can lift 100lbs. that isn't relevant to how much fat is being visually measured on you.
- you are a bigger girl and have been more prone to being sedative since childhood because of the fact that you are a bigger girl. your body isn't any more "built for weightlifting" than the next 12 girls. your body is built for in case there is a famine you can get fucked and survive with a newborn.
- 240 is big. you are not mostly muscle. and you do not hold much of any more muscle mass than girls who don't have the amount of fat that you have. i'm sure you're a bit stronger because of all the weight you lug and your overall size - aside form weightlifting and walking.
- your clothing and pose in your selfie is an illusion.
- you can't change your overall shape. if you are a pear you are going to stay a pear. bodybuilding can change this by giving off an illusion.
- if you want to look like melissa debling you need to head on over >>>/fit/
- you're in denial that your lifestyle is based around media sub-cultural ideals which you identify yourself with in order for you to have self-preservation yet still be able to go out in the world and change yourself.
- you have to run with this before you can assess your bf situation accurately. you are lying to yourself and us. the systems of thinking you are showing us is scattered and inaccurate.
>>17332945
Fight me, faggot.
>>17332984
Yes.
>>17332991
>>17332998
>>17333001
>not getting double stuff or uh oh
>the can is either warm or not cold enough
>tortilla chips on shorts
>holey pillows and holey blanket suffer internal crumbs
>sprinkle donuts with minimal sprinkles.
>tits not poking through the thin shirt
>not wearing coca-cola shirt to rebel against what is being consumed
>>17333032
>holey pillows and holey blanket suffer internal crumbs
Truth.
