I've used the premium accounts for okc and pof, and they're pretty useful, to an extent. I just wanna know if anyone has other suggestions.

Do you virgins not use dating apps?

>>17295542
Can you expand on the OKC premium thing?

It's expensive as all shit and I'm not sure I'll even notice a change (I get ~5 visitors per week as a guy), so I don't know if it'll be worth it. And as far as I know there's no trial versions.

What changes have you noticed?

>>17296132
That was me, the op.
And it's pretty nifty cause you have greater control over search, let's you see read messages. But my favorite wa seeing who likes you.
But not much difference in bitches answering.

>>17296239
I have no problem with girls answering my messages, I think I've had 3-4 messages unanswered in over 3 years of having an OKC account. I don't think the A-List can actually help you in that regard.

The main selling points for me are being able to see who liked me and visibility. Did you notice an increase in visitors?

>>17296243
A lot more visitors. Also, you can boost yourself like once a day?

>>17296261
Are you sure? I thought Boosts were a separate thing. Plus, it's not mentioned in the list of benefits when signing up for A-List.

>>17296243
Can you help me with the messages?
I hardly ever get responses, what's your profile like,

>>17296266
Oh, maybe they changed it?
I could use it before in November, I think.
But you definitely get more views.

>>17296275
My profile basically has next to zero information about me. I just joke around a lot about myself on it and that's about it.

After talking to quite a few people on OKC, it's fucking staggering how many guys send messages along the lines of "hi" or "hello" or shit like that. The fact that OKC went from sending mail-like messages to instant messages didn't help either.

The most helpful advice I can give you when sending a message is to not even say "Hello". Just go to her profile, find something you have in common and send her a message about that. No introduction (you have a profile for that), and especially no asking "how are you doing?". That's one of the worst, and has no reply that would be interesting for either parties.

>>17296278
So the only thing that's kind of useful is raising your visibility. Thanks for the info, I'll get a month of it to see for myself tonight, if only out of morbid curiosity.

>>17296298
I never send a basic message, I always look through their profile and come up with a witty/relevant response, but get nothing

>>17296395
another anon here, I find it just has to be relevant not witty. If you try to be too witty it shows that you are trying too hard. First thing that comes to mind about said topic is usually fine, assuming its not creepy