Put the nudes inside a file that can only be opened with a password (Like a .rar file), and put it onto a USB. Then lock the USB with a password. Only use that USB for nudes.

The only 100% sure way to prevent nude leaks is to not take nudes in the first place.

>>17203389
Well. Your logic is sound, but similarly one shouldn't carry cash while going out in the chances of getting robbed or pickpocketed. This is the 21st century where almost /everything/ is digitalized. Get over it.

>>17203374
Sounds good enough. Only problem is if that USB falls in the wrong hands.

>>17203339
I'm hacking you and taking your noods right now

>>17203403
Should I be obliged?

I'm really into programming, so what I did is made my own vault. When you click on it, it automatically goes to 0 opacity and will not become visible unless you press certain keys on the keyboard. Then in order to actually get into the vault you need 2 passwords and a .jpg file with a specific name.

Why all the security? I have some weird fetishes. Anyway, I'm sure with some Googling you'll be able to find a program similar to mine. If you end up not trusting technology, you can always print them out, put them in an envelope/small box and hide them somewhere.

>>17203415
Well, such complex vaults aren't available that easily. But will search about it.
I've been thinking about using military-grade encryption.
Since you claim to be into programming, got any say on it?

And I do trust technology. Just the "correct" one.

>>17203339
UPDATE: I'm not bothered about physical means of nudes getting leaked, such as someone snooping on my device manually.
What I'm concerned about is applications and malicious elements or even hackers.
Thus I ask for adivce for maximum prevention of them getting leaked.

>>17203426
>I've been thinking about using military-grade encryption
I don't really know what you mean? When someone says "military-grade encryption" they usually mean off-the-shelf algorithms (Encryption unknown to the public). How do you have access to such encryption?

Well, whatever. You can use those "military"-grade encryptions if it's unknown to the public, because then no one will be able to decrypt it. You can also look up tutorials on making your own hash/encryption, it's actually very easy.

>>17203438
By "military-grade" I mean algorithm used for their /basic/ stuff.
I suppose that's quite smooth enough for a casual.

Obviously their own "unknown" encryption algorithm is used for highly sensitive information.

Well, will look up how to make my own, if that's possible.