Fighting over past
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /adv/ - Advice
You are currently reading a thread in /adv/ - Advice
Can someone tell me whats wrong with not liking people with a promiscuous sexual history. I wont go into detail about how me and my gf are fighting over it since I already made a thread about it, but why am I not allowed to find a girl repulsive for such actions. Furthermore why am I expected to stay with my gf even though she has such a history. Like Im insecure because I dont value a girl who acts like other peoples fleshlights.
>Cant handle the fact that she slept with other people
I hate hearing this so much. I dont give a shit if I can handle it or not. I dont want to. I want sex to be kinda our thing. Something special. Not some shitty hedonistic act as everyone treats it as.
>tldr on why Im here
Got in huge fight with gf after learning her sexual history. She said I should get over it and I went autism mode and told her having sex with her is like being given a used tissue and theres no reason why I would value sex with her. Shes trying to use that as leverage that Im not thinking straight and shouldnt break up what we have together.
>>17177987
>not allowed to find a girl repulsive for such actions
You are allowed. And she's allowed to think you're an asshole.
I mean you can think whatever you want. girls that don't have any experience with sex probably won't give you a pleasurable experience.
personally I don't care about someones sexual history unless they have aids
>>17177987
You're completely allowed to be an insecure little bitch with unreasonable expectations but she's allowed to tell you off for those flaws of yours. She had a life before you. If you want a pure maiden waifu, stick to anime or steal an infant to raise as a sexy slave, because that's what you want.
Look at this OP.
If you leave her than you'll be a used dildo. It won't be "special" for any future girls.
>>17178076
He's already a dildo, used or not.
>>17178076
theres mint condition and then there cumrag.
>>17178022
>making butthurt assumptions and accusations
And what flaw exactly are you talking about.
>>17177987
You can think what you want of her, but we, as well as your soon to be ex girlfriend, are free to think you're being a limpdick faggot about it.
Stop romanticizing the "We should only have each other sexually" mentality. You sound like a giant faggot.
I think the only reason you see a problem here is because you're insecure about yourself that all these chads got to your girlfriend before you, and you know there will be plenty of chads pleasuring her sweet sugar walls long after you're gone.
Get over yourself. You're not expected to stay with her. Honestly, I hope you two do break up that was she doesn't have to deal with your dick being tucked between your thighs all the time.
>I bet you're one of those people that gets upset over your girlfriend spending time with her guy friends as well.
>>17178120
Are you a man or a woman?
>>17178120
>I think the only reason you see a problem here is because you're insecure about yourself
I honestly think its so pathetic that you can fathom why people dont want a used fleshlight for a girlfriend. Because the problem can never actually be with you.
I envy you only in the sense that you give me hope that even an autistic retard can get a girlfriend? Damn, anything is possible I guess.
You deserve to lose her if you feel this way.
>>17178129
I'm a guy?
>>17178132
Buddy I can fully understand why you think it's wrong, and that's fine. But most people are going to think that you/OP are being dramatic about it.
>>17178120
This post REEKS of insecurity. You're the one who can't seem to accept somebody choosing a different lifestyle than yours. Maybe it's easier to sleep at night if you tell yourself that everyone else is just like you, everyone's relationship is just like yours
>>17178143
>I'm a guy?
>with a question mark
Couldn't have said it better myself.
>>17178020
Why would you want a girl who got good at sex from riding someone elses dick? That doesnt even make sense. Why are you such a cuck.
How many are we talking about?
Did she sleep with a different dude every week through highschool and college?
Or did she have 2-3 relationships in which she had sex?
>>17178143
>person who sleeps with anyone surprised people who dont care
nothing surprising there.
>>17177987
>I want sex to be kinda our thing
I fucking love this train of thought!!! I fucking love that you're so stupid, selfish, and retarded to say these things to her. The trust has been broken my friend! She's never going to look at you the same way and now she has the ammo to break up with your pathetic ass. I absolutely love that you can't accept facts taht as humans, we all have different desires and needs and not only did she find a way to discover herself, she also found you. And basically was into you. She wanted to be with you. She wanted to fuck you. She wants to talk to you. She wants to be exclusive with you.
AND YOU'RE TOO DUMB TO GIVE THAT A CHANCE ALL BECAUSE YOU'RE INSECURE AS FUCK. GET OVER YOURSELF, STOP BEING A BITCH ON AN INTERNET FORUM, AND EITHER ACCEPT THAT YOU CAN'T BE IN A RELATIONSHIP, OR STOP BEING A FUCKING PUSSY AND ACCEPT WHAT IS.
Otherwise, my young friend, you're going to live your life in the most pathetic way. Probably why you're here in the first place. Probably never had too many friends to begin with. Probably still a mama's boy, I bet your parents still help you with money. All you're ever gonna be is a pathetic excuse of space that would be more useful towards someone that doesn't care how many people someone slept with
>>17178155
The college experience
>>17177987
OP you can choose any qualification or disqualification and I don't see her history and it bothering you as insecurity. It's your life and you get to choose.
I do fault you for arguing about it because it changes nothing. It will never make you feel better and even if you convince her that her behavior was whorish then you are dating a whore.
You only recourse when discovering a deal breaker is to break the deal, leave and not give a fuck what she thinks about it. The only person that should care is you but make sure you choose better next time.
>>17178147
I just don't see whether or not I have a dick/vagina matters. Message is still the same.
>>17178144
I don't know how my alleged intolerance connects to insecurity. I can fully accept that there are people out there like OP. But I can also think that they're wrong, and that they're thinning out their own herd of possible women by doing this.
>>17178159
>insecure insults and scare tactics: the post
Go discover yourself at a whore house or something.
>>17178168
Because if you were a man, and not a "guy?" you wouldn't want to settle down and start a family with a woman you couldn't trust
Real men know the difference between a woman and a ho. A "guy?" will just take whatever he can get, and fly into a rage anytime someone questions his judgment.
>>17178168
>I just don't see whether or not I have a dick/vagina matters. Message is still the same
No the message is heavily biased with feminism nonsense. Which is why he doesnt believe youre a man.
And its clear you are insecure in the fact that someone wouldnt want you because of your past sexual tendencies.
>>17178169
aww poor baby. Such a tough internet warrior. Maybe I will discover myself there. At least I'm not some loser on 4chan complaining about my girlfriend
>>17178159
I think you missed the point of OP's post. OP is fully aware that she WANTS to be with him. He did "give that a chance," he got to know her, learned about her, and now he doesn't want to be with her anymore.
>>17178167
>leave and not give a fuck what she thinks about it
While the post sounds like a good idea, I find that part unreasonably heartless.
>>17177987
Nothing wrong with it. You're allowed to have standards when it comes to dating.
Dump her and do not date someone with a promiscuous sexual history - you can't change their morals and their past.
If you stay with her, tho, shut the fuck up about it and stop complaining. It's your choice to date someone who is not "good enough" for you and you shouldn't bother them with it.
>>17178175
>Id rather work at a whore house than be on 4chan
My sides
>>17178179
No, you're right. And I'm sorry. I jumped the gun. But my point might still stand.
He could 100% learn from this girl and benefit from someone who knows more sexually but instead he's gonna be an insecure bitch about it and that's his dealbreaker? He's gonna come to 4chan and whine like a bitch rather than fucking? Shit, there's people out there that deserved to get laid, and this autistic asshole is butthurt cause his lady has some real world experience?
>>17178182
it's not heartless to end something that needs to end way before it turns to hate. The alternative is two unhappy people or one really miserable one that pretends they're happy.
when will you learn that sex has NOTHING to do with value?? I'm sorry your parents raised you with these "morals" but you're not only disgusting, but simply misguided in thinking this to be true. Also, if she really was raped like you said in the first thread, you are the most apathetic person I have ever come across. I hope she can eventually recover from being so disrespected by an invalid like you.
>>17178164
Uhm can you explain?
Im there but the experience is torture and trying to pass shit without failing by some subjective shit from professors
Dunno i think casual sex is disgusting and i think yiu have the right to disapprove of it
She has the right to call you an ass
You can breakup
Depending on the amount of people and how she's changed id see but you never know
>>17178173
I've been with other women before, what right do I have to be upset with a girl who has done the same with other men?
>couldn't trust.
Well she obviously trusted OP enough to tell him, which started this whole shit storm.
>>17178174
Well, I am a guy. I've got a dick between my legs and xy chromosomes. Idk, to me stuff like this are trivial worries in the grand scheme of things. He's free to be concerned about it, but I just can't begin to understand why, other than he's lost self-created value in this girl because other chads have gotten to her first.
I don't get how thinking a woman is free to do what she wants with her body, as a man is free to do what he wants with his, is feminism. I just think that's letting a human be a human.
>>17178185
autism at it's finest. Why do I have to work there? I was talking about going to a whore house, fucking a bunch of whores. Lern 2 reed stoopid
>>17178188
You realize that emphasis on sexuality and sexual prowess is something only promiscuous people concentrate on. Its not a positive trait in the eyes of everyone.
>>17178188
I think it's just ass-backwards to think that someone with a ton of sexual partners is more knowledgable about sex and love.
And it's also naive to think the relationship's going to last when she's had so many others that didn't. Believe it or not, there are people in this world that still take relationships seriously, that fall in love and settle down and start families.
I don't know if that's OP's situation, but that's why I would've rejected the same girl for the same reason. I certainly wouldn't have called her a "used fleshlight," to her face OR on the Internet, but I would've broken up. I wouldn't plan a future with someone who had a history of making quick, impulsive decisions with her body and her sexuality. I'm more of a long-haul person. I don't think that makes me insecure, or naive, or puritanical. I know what I want, and I don't think my standards are unrealistic or unattainable.
>>17178198
>I don't get how thinking a woman is free to do what she wants with her body, as a man is free to do what he wants with his, is feminism
More feminist force fed bs. Cant expect women to understand complex ideas like discipline and self control.
>>17178192
>when will you learn that sex has NOTHING to do with value?
>Im a valuable person but I like people use me as a fleshlight. See how valuable I am.
I see the value of a fleshlight.
Nothing is 'wrong' with having the opinion that you do.
I personally have a different opinion, and that is fine.
>>17178005
>>17178011
>>17178020
>>17178022
>>17178076
>>17178090
THese
>>17178206
yeah it's not a positive trait but it's a real world experience. I get that everyone grows up with different morals but sexually, virgins fucking suck at sex. You can watch all the POV porn in the world and it still won't give you that awesome moment of pleasure with someone. Especially someone that kinda knows what their doing but more importantly, knows what gives them pleasure. Sure, most guys just need a kiss and for them to get their wiener touched but there's so many other emotions and things that come up with sex.
This young nigga should be grateful that not only he has a girl that wants to be with him and fuck him but she has some experience to help him open up sexually.
But I guess that's why this loser is on 4chan as opposed to fucking his chick
>>17178217
I guess. You do you, man. I'm not here to change your mind.
>>17178198
>Let's just ignore biology and reality and our own instincts and live in a utopia
Men can't get pregnant. Women can. This is why the "double standard" exists, has always existed, and will never go away. We can repress our nature, but we can't destroy it. It'll just come out in other ways. Like a five-paragraph insulting rage-post anytime someone questions your beliefs.
You've been brainwashed by whores, son. I wish there was a less ridiculous way to say it, but that's the truth.
>>17178211
the difference here though, is would you just do your thing and learn from it, or would you jump onto an internet forum saying these things?
You seem like you would be able to have your shit together and learn from it.
OP is being a giant pussy complaining on the internet
>>17178250
I don't look down on people who have a lot of casual sex, I have lots of close friends who live differently than I do. But when it comes to my relationships, I'm mad picky.
But no, like I said, if I were in OP's shoes I wouldn't be trashing the girl all over the Internet. I just wouldn't be dating her anymore.
>>17178240
>I wish there was a less ridiculous way to say it, but that's the truth.
You're free to think you're taking the high ground and saying I'm brainwashed. Do I think I'm brainwashed? No. I don't think you're brainwashed either. It's just on how you view things. I just don't give a fuck what people do with their bodies/minds as long as they're not hurting/hindering others in their life. That's not for me to worry about. And I mean truly hurting/hindering someone, not just "It doesn't coincide with my beliefs so it bothers me".
>>17178268
You're still the same guy who wrote this masterpiece here >>17178120 right?
why do you care what a bunch of landwhales on this site think? do your own fucking thing, fuck everyone else
>>17178276
Yep
>>17178233
see>>17178151
Its ideas like this that show why promiscuous people arent compatible with others and shouldnt date them. You can always get good at sex later and if you are in it for the long haul its fine to wait. But thats a foreign concept to promiscuous people that think theyre sexual ability is a merit when it really just shows how loose they are.
>>17178175
>At least I'm not some loser on 4chan
>posts in 4chan
LOL
>>17177987
>why am I not allowed to find a girl repulsive for such actions
You are absolutely allowed.
And either/both of you are free to find other people if you can't work it out. Sounds like it's a dealbreaker for you. Break up and cut all ties via phone, social media, etc.
>>17178341
also meant to add:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlYZnd7dEPw
girls get just as much pleasure from sex as guys. why should they not be aloud to enjoy it?
>>17178387
>I cant understand the concept of not being a slut
>>17177987
I'm so tired of this thread being made over and over.
You've got the right to be a stupid asshole. We've got the right to call you a stupid asshole. Break up with her. You're not expected to stay with her. You've insisted on referring to a human being as a fleshlight several times and now you have to accept the ridicule and scorn that comes with making such a retarded statement.
This debate is pointless because some people will care about previous partners and some people won't. You care. Congratulations. Fuck off to a convent or amish village and find yourself the beautiful, pure waifu you've always dreamed of and leave us out of it.
Its that simple.
>>17178240
Using nature as an excuse for something being valid is called "appealing to nature". Its a logical fallacy and is not evidence for something being good or bad, its a cop out for not having a compelling argument.
Human relationships and sociology is more complicated than biology. You know that. Stop using biology as an excuse to be an asshole.
>>17178429
No you idiot. Holy shit you are retarded. Appealing to nature fallacy is for when you are saying things are 'natural' when nature has nothing to do with it.
Not when you are actually talking about nature.
Typical woman being retarded.
And if you knew anything about biology, youd know that for men sex is more instinctual than for a woman especially since woman are on birth control now. You have no excuse for being a slut.
Remember this is a cuck board full of betas who cope with having whore gfs, and actual whores.
You are allowed to think girls with higher partner counts make for less suitable partners, you don't HAVE to date anyone. Tons of research supports this btw.
Personally I don't care about partner count when it comes to girls I only want sex with, but when it comes to relationships there's no compromising and anything more than 1-2 is too much. At this stage it also shouldn't be too hard to figure out her real count yet because of the glaring sexual inexperience.
>>17178444
>Appealing to nature fallacy is for when you are saying things are 'natural' when nature has nothing to do with it.
False. You are 100% incorrect. Appeal to nature is when you use the fact that something is "natural" as evidence of it being either right or wrong. Is your Google broken?
>And if you knew anything about biology, youd know that for men sex is more instinctual than for a woman especially since woman are on birth control now. You have no excuse for being a slut.
Firstly, I'm not a woman. Secondly, you're using the fallacy again. If you want to use "biology" as an excuse to behave like an insecure little bitch then be my guest. The rest of the functional world prefers to be better people than that and no amount of your childish hissy fits can stop that from happening.
>>17178449
>when it comes to relationships there's no compromising and anything more than 1-2 is too much
>>17178468
This is what happens when people never take a philosophy class and try to sound smart. Couldnt be more stupid.
>>17178487
kek.
"An appeal to nature is an argument or rhetorical tactic in which it is proposed that "a thing is good because it is 'natural', or bad because it is 'unnatural'".[1] It is usually an invalid argument, because the implicit (unstated) primary premise "What is natural is good" typically is irrelevant, having no cogent meaning in practice, or is an opinion instead of a fact."
Took me 5 seconds to find on Google. I'm not sure what taking a philosophy class has to do with you being a dipshit.
>>17178468
You are a legitimate retard. YOU just agreed with >>17178429 .
>youd know that for men sex is more instinctual than for a woman especially since woman are on birth control now
This is %100 correct according to biology. Women are supposed to be picky with mates due to them needing someone to protect and provide for them and their spawn. Have you read a biology textbook before? Do you know anything about women and what makes them different from men? Are you just parroting what reddit and feminist told you to say in hopes to get some pussy?
Goddamn liberalism really is for the mentally retarded.
>inb4 lolbertarian.
>inb4 you tell me how much of a feminist you are
>>17178444
>>17178429
Correction, these two posts are agreeing.
>>17178503
>Women are supposed to be picky with mates due to them needing someone to protect and provide for them and their spawn.
>Women are supposed to be
You're projecting. Like I said, you can keep using biology as an excuse to think the things you think. That's fine. I'm not here to change your mind.
Its just very apparent than any narrative that challenges the one you've convinced yourself of is very threatening to you. Blame it on liberalism. Blame it on feminism.
Your insecurity shines through all of your statements like a beacon, my friend.
You can appeal to nature again and again and again and say "IM AN ASSHOLE CUZ BIOLOGY". That might work for you but a lot of other people choose to base their moral code on more than a few quotes from a biology textbook.
You do you, anon. I'm glad you've found your direction in life, even if it means being an angry manchild who uses dated biological imperatives as justification for why its ok to be an ignorant piece of shit.
>>17178512
>Correction, these two posts are agreeing.
No, they aren't.
This
>Its a logical fallacy and is not evidence for something being good or bad,
and this,
>Appealing to nature fallacy is for when you are saying things are 'natural' when nature has nothing to do with it.
Are not saying the same thing. At all. Is english not your first language? I'm genuinely wondering at this point.
>>17178477
It's my life and I make my own decisions, but don't worry most men don't care or can't afford to care, so you'll find some schlub to settle down with
>>17178502
how I know youve never taken a philosophy class. Idiots always think they are smart enough to google but dont understand theyre too stupid to interpret. The kind that read a neuroscience paper and think they understand how the brain works. Its hilarious how dumb people like you are. Do yourself a favor and get an education so you dont embarrass yourself more.
>>17178308
the irony is palpable
>>17178444
>>17178487
What
If you had taken any serious classes regarding philosophy you'd know that, first of all, there isn't a class called "Philosophy" because the area is divided into many different disciplines. The only time I've heard of a Philosophy Class was in high school.
Second of all, are you seriously trying to convince me you know the first thing about ethics? Do you think 4chan is composed of nothing but teenagers or something? Because holy shit if you had read one. ONE. single. book. on this subject, you'd know you can't possibly say "being a slut is wrong and this is undeniable". Hell, you'd know that resorting to biology is an enormous faux pas, and you'd know that you're pretty much yelling I'M A RETARD from the top of your lungs.
>>17178570
Holy shit youre even more stupid than I thought
Yeah because taking a math class implies you are taking a class over all of math in one. Did I capitalize philosophy class. How can you actually be this stupid. Its hilarious now. Im not even mad.
just ditch her and find some other idiot you can trick into thinking you're not an autist
i don't see how you would need advice
I think you're right. You're totally allowed to OP, and I don't think you're limp dick or whatever everyone else thinks. Sex is something that connects me and my girlfriend in such a big way. We share this intamacy with only each other and we don't have a sexual past. Sex really can't be that special if it's something that's traded among people whenever they want a fuck. Most people who are willing to call others faggots or limp dick are just in denial about the fact that they themselves couldnt maintain the non promiscuous lifestyle, or that they will never find someone who could. Its okay to not care what OP is saying but to get upset about it is dumb. Every guy saying these things to OP is also probably in denial about how cucked they feel. OP is putting all his trust into this one person wanting something special, the real insecure people are those who have to adhere to the idea that their SO has fucked a lot and that's normal because that person is what they can get. Again if you don't believe it matters at all, then good. But if you're willing to attack OP on his beliefs then fuck off because you must have a problem. These are just 2 ideals and those attacking OP make no sense as to why his opinion affects you so much.
>>17178598
>But if you're willing to attack OP on his beliefs then fuck off
he said, obliviously, on a Vietnamese stick drawing message board.
>>17178586
I'm not the anon you were speaking to. And saying philosophy instead of ethics or morality is weird as hell if you're actually taking those classes. And >>17178542 mocking someone for using Google to DEFINE A FUCKING FALLACY is tryhard as hell, anon wasn't wrong or misinterpreting anything because identifying them is something everyone in the internet and their grandmas are capable of doing.
You're lying. You're stupid. You use biology as basis for your morality and then come to me saying you've taken classes on the subject? Yeah, nah. Hope this is bait because if you're serious then I'm very sorry for you.
>>17178652
No you idiot. Because guess what, theres no ethics department. And there sure as isnt a morality department. Now im at least 70% certain you didnt even go to college. Your stupidity is becoming more and more palpable.
>>17178151
>Why would you want a cook who got good at making food from making it for someone else? That doesnt even make sense.
>Why would you want a private teacher who got good at teaching children from teaching someone elses'? That doesnt even make sense.
>Why would you want a surgeon who got good at saving lives from cutting open other people? That doesnt even make sense.
>>17178655
>Because guess what, theres no ethics department. And there sure as isnt a morality department.
>What is the social studies department?
>>17178652
oh and to add, ethics and morality as a subject is a subset of philosophy. But you might now even be that anon because at least he wasnt so stupid he couldnt use google.
>>17178656
Sex isn't any of those things. Because obviously cooking for your friend doesn't cause divorces in America.
>>17178659
>social studies department
holy shit this isnt high school pal. theres no social studies department. We call it humanities. Unless you are from a foreign country or a literal child you have no excuse to be this stupid.
>>17177987
It's okay not to want to be with her. I would not be with a man who has been with too many women. I want to be with a man who has been with around the same number of people as I have. We'd be playing on an even field; and there wouldn't be any reason for jealousy on either side - because again - we'd have about the same amount of experience.
Nobody can tell you who to share your body with - that is your choice. Feeling comfortable or uncomfortable with a partner who has had manyyy previous partners is your own personal choice :)
BUT that is extremely cruel to refer to the person you are with as a 'used tissue' :( Again, each person can use their body how they wish - they shouldn't be judged like that unless they are directly harming someone (eg: child molestation, rape, etc). My best advice to you would be to apologize for your nasty comments, but be truthful in that you can't handle her extensive sexual past and therefore you must break up before things get worse.
>>17178663
You realize you guys are now talking about where ethic classes and morality classes fit in a university. This is a Swedish cuck acceptance thread, take your banter elsewhere.
>>17178656
Because Im not spending my life and giving half of myself to any of them. See how you cant into analogies. sex is just a servic
>>17178676
In my country it's
"Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades", so yeah.
>>17178682
Its not an argument. Ethics is a branch of philosophy. Its just me pointing out how retarded he is and how hes clearly never taken a philosophy class.
>>17178676
>in my le college it's called humanities
>therefore because my college, you must be stupid or not a human of you think that lelelelelele
>>17178670
Sexual experience before the relationship, especially when OP had the same, does neither. At least not to a significant degree.
The pill did and does.
There is no way to change that though.
>>17178120
Spot the white knight nu-male cuck everyone. Probably a butthurt roastie though
>>17178684
HOHO so your country has no philosophy class for you to take. You can tell you havent taken a philosophy class before because philosophy is a joke in your country. And from guessing by your language, nothing of value philosophically speaking or even scientifically speaking has ever been produced. So your stupidity is forgiven a little.
>>17178694
You're taking my example of showing how it isn't as special and applying it to the thread. That's not the scenario though, read what you said again, and take into account that sex is not cooking.
>>17178687
>doesnt know what humanities is
Let me break this down for idiots. This isnt a college particular thing, its how the fields themselves are broken down and only uneducated retards dont know this
humanities->philosophy->ethics class
science->physics->dynamics class
can you see the trend or is your iq so low you cant spot the pattern.
>>17178159
This roastie sure did get toastie from this thread
>>17178697
Just because his ethics classes are in the social studies department doesn't mean his entire country or school doesn't have philosophy classes. I'm american at tier 1 and our ethics are in the criminal justice department. By the way philosophy classes once you get into ethics because utter shit representation for individuals.
>>17178705
How's your liberal arts major coming along, champ ?
>>17178705
>humanities->philosophy->ethics class
science->physics->dynamics
There's no way you actually think this? You kind of just destroyed your whole argument, this is not accurate at all. Looks like a child threw a list of random classes together.
Your views are fine, but getting too much into purity and you have to realise you are an outlier in the social thinking in the west, and that is why your gf isn't seeing on the same wavelength.
If this is that big an issue then I'd end it now because it isn't going to work for both of you in the long term.
There is difference in between liberal with regards to having sex, and being a straight up ho. If it is just the former, I'd consider evaluating your own beliefs and why you think like that. You'll never be 16 again getting with innocent girls, if that is what you want then think again.
>>17178732
>random list of classes
You realize theres only two classes there right. Fucking idiots.
>>17178723
I got a BS and BEng. But I had some spare time to take a few philosophy classes.
>>17178705
That is literally only a thing in the US. You cannot judge the whole world's scientific categories by your countries'.
In Germany - which is quite an educated country - we do for example not consider philosophy part of humanities (Humanwissenschaften) but as part of the "Sciences of the spirit" (Gesiteswissenschaften).
Our categories are like this:
- Naturwissenschaften (natural sciences):
Cf. Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Astronomy, Geology, etc.
- Humanwissenschaften (humanities):
Cf. Psychology, Medicine, Human biology, Anthropology, social-science, pedagogy, social work sciences, etc.
- Geisteswissenschaften (Sciences of the spirit):
Cf. Philosophy, Theology, Religious Studies, Languages, Music Theory, Art history, Literature, Journalism, etc.
So please grow up and pull that nationalistic stick out of your arse.
>>17178741
>few
Hallo, my name is goober and I am think I qualifiy 2 pyscho analyze and interpreterdit Op's ethacs fank you 4 u consaderootion.
>>17178748
>Sciences of the spirit
My sides. I cant stop laughing. No wonder you all are idiots.
>>17178759
>No wonder you all are idiots.
Yeah, right.
>>17178756
>I never went to school and dont know what philosophy is but I can call people out on making philosophical errors
kek
>>17178782
You see friend, the way things work around here (society) is you can make fun of people when they reveal facts about themselves that are worth a laugh. But you can't keep making assumptions about people and then basing my intelligence off your made up stories. I have my masters thanks, not in hu-man-titties, but regardless I wrote or helped with all of my friends philosophy papers as he was majoring in it.
>>17178801
no according to you, it was his social studies papers. Couldnt be funnier.
>>17177987
>Can someone tell me whats wrong with not liking people with a promiscuous sexual history.
Part of it's the denial that people can and do change, especially when it comes to things like this. We all judge people, and to a certain extend this is necessary, but alongside the ability to judge comes the duty to judge fairly, taking in all relevant information into account. Judging someone only by their history means refusing to take in relevant information -for starters, the present- and that makes you an unfair judge.
But there is a second reason. Nobody believes you when you say "people". The truth is, you only dislike people with a promiscuous sexual history if they are female. You may or may not laud men with such histories, but you do not pass the same kinds of negative judgments. So not only do you refuse to take in relevant information, you also base your judgment on irrelevant factors. On doing so, you cross the line from being an unfair judge to being a corrupt judge.
And that, in a nutshell, is what's wrong.
>>17178819
Not the same guy buddy, the fact that you can't keep up shows enough.
>>17178849
There's a reason sex is seen as a big thing, yeah whoever fucked around shouldn't be judged for their decision they made in the past. But they are, because they were warned and they wanted to be a free spirit etc. there are consequences to being a free spirit and not thinking about your future this is one of them.
>>17178853
>>17178819
Ah yes, watching two autists fight to the death
This whole modern idea that people shouldn't be judged for their own actions is retarded. Of course they should.
And for anyone who is saying "sexual experience is good, why are you upset?" to OP, realise that this is because many people consider sex to be a special, intimate, personal thing; while to you its just a fun activity with no special meaning. I don't think either side are bad people, just different.
To see it from someone like OP or my view, try thinking of marriage instead of sex.
"Hey, you should't judge someone for how many marriages they have had. So what if she was married to 20 guys before you? That just means she has plenty of marriage experience for you to learn from!"
Not so appealing is it? (This analogy assumes you at least find marriage special to work)
>>17179161
I always bring in the marriage argument for this.
I wouldnt really want to date a woman whos been married like 5 times. So I wouldnt want to have date a woman whos had 5 or so partners.
Theyre just disgusting.
