Why is is hard to find a woman that doesn't have casual sex?
>>16975705
is it*
Because the girls that don't have casual sex don't want you.
>>16975710
Doesn't that make me Chad
Because you're a fucking faggot?
Because men are so fucking pushy about it
Because sexual desire is innate here on Earth.
You must be new.
>>16975997
Take responsibility for your behavior, woman.
>>16975705
It's actually not that hard.
I suggest you evaluate your social circles because its likely the reason you only encounter hoebags.
>>16975705
Casual sex is fun and it feels super neato
you should try it sometime
>>16975705
Wait, what? Pegasus I thought you were better than this to make these kind of threads.
>>16975705
Find a Mormon
>>16976001
I think she meant,
is it so hard to find a man that doesn't want casual sex?
why don't you take responsibility you rutting pig and stop valuing the time you give a woman based on whether or not you can fucking stick your dick in her?
fucking swine
i hate this fucking mentality
this need for purity exists because you treat women like walking fleshlights, where obviously the less used it is, preferably not used at all, is the most valuable.
you fucking deserve JACK SHIT if that's how you're going to view and treat women.
I applaud women who go out there and do and take what they want, irrespective of what the dicks say. Your whole perspective on women is warped, you're nothing more than senseless animals.
Good on the ladies and good on third wave feminism for triggering all the loser hypocrits who pretend their problems with female morality are more principled than they really are.
ITT: People bitching about other people doing what makes them happy
>erronne gotta measure up to muh stndrds
>>16975705
>>16975705
God dam it peg I just lost all respect for ya.
girls who don't have casual sex have high standards.
If there standards were low, then they'd have casual sex like most girls.
I've never had casual sex, and I have high standards for myself and my partner.
Life for example, I don't think having casual sex is a good choice for myself, and I'd prefer a partner who also believes that casual sex isn't a good choice for him. I'm not really interested in guys who have been around the block unless they've made a real 180 in which case I'd perhaps consider it.
>>16976276
This. I'm in the same boat OP, I'm more interested with the person I'm fucking not how much. Why I've decided to stop being a fatass. If you want something longterm then turn yourself into a keeper.
Because society pushes girls for casual sex.
Women do it because it validates them.
Women prefer casual sex because they can get men higher then their own league.
I have nothing against casual sex di per se, but I think it poisons girls mind because they cannot have truly deep emotional connections.
When you're the 30th, you're easily disposable and she won't have the emotional trauma of breaking up, because she's used to it.
>>16976276
This.
Not having casual sex is one of the things I do to be a better person. I also try to be as attractive as possible (diet, exercise, looking feminine), I excel in my studies, have hobbies and work on my personality.
I wouldn't date someone who isn't really a keeper.
>>16976276
For the average guy it's easier to have a relationship than having a one night stand.
>>16976301
>better person
Shame that everyone has other standards as to what makes a good person. I for example regard people closed minded about casual sex as a negative trait to being a good person.
Please remark that I am in no way speaking about loyalty here. As a dude who has - sort of - come around a couple of girls, I am still loyal to my girlfriend. Cheating is an absolute no-go. Whom she fucked before me though is none of my concerns.
>>16976458
I have no problems with the "number" or purity or whatever.
I give a high meaning to sex. To me, it has always been something that it's between me and the person I love.
I want to be with a person who feels the same way about it.
I'd rather date a guy who fucked 8 people he felt deeply connected to than someone who fucked 3 because "he was drunk and it was fun".
This being told - I don't go around imposing my way of seeing it to others, I don't blame people for not feeling the way I do, and I don't give a shit about others' sex life.
If this makes me close minded, whatever.
>>16976268
>respecting a troll
You've only disrespected yourself jabroni
>>16976195
Yes, keep doing that, more easy pussy for me
Just don't expect me to actually give a fuck about you, lmao
Because there's huge pressure on women to "not be a slut" from basically all sides. And if they come from any sort of religious background, the pressure is even higher.
Also women have to be more careful about pregnancy.
>>16977091
Shit, well I look like an idiot now.
>>16976276
Then why the fuck do you care? Go have your objective standards elsewhere and tip your fedora on the way out.
>>16976195
I agree with this. Virginity being valued is a largely outdated concept based on a pathetic understanding of sex that downplays women's enjoyment and insists that men deserve sexual pleasure if they're in a relationship.
It's silly. And you're silly for getting upset over this. Women love sex, and have it when they want. Deal with it imo.
>>16976182
I'm happy there are posters like you
>>16977363
>>16977459
Roasties fuck off.
>>16975705
Most single moms qualify.
Introverted girls with goals qualify. Victims of sexual abuse who aren't flirty qualify.
Religious girls qualify.
You know where to find these girls, anon. Good luck.
>>16976268
Wanting a girl that isn't into casual sex isn't the same as wanting a pure virgin waifu. Learn to reading comprehension.
>>16977363
Are you saying that men don't deserve sexual pleasure? If so, you are a hypocrite. Men can have sex whenever they want too, I don't get why you needed yo make this remark.
Church with strong sexual morals or time travel. Dunno which is easier since churches like that are dying off.
>>16977497
>settling for used/damaged goods
Fuck outta here, cuck.
>>16975705
Because you're on 4chan where everyone does the opposite of what society tells them to do.
Here the men are all virgins saving themselves for marriage and the women are all nymphomaniacs with 200+ partners asking for advice on handling 6 FWBs at once.
>>16977587
Hahaha, you're cute.
Perhaps you missed, "introverted girls with goals" and, "religious girls"?
Seems the one who should fuck off is the one who can't process everything he reads.
>>16977531
I'm saying everyone should calm down and accept that people are going to have sex lives. Not sure how you got that I didn't want men having sex from that.
>>16977679
>pathetic understanding of sex that downplays women's enjoyment and insists that men deserve sexual pleasure if they're in a relationship.
>>16977679
>>16977689
Yep. I got that too. But I'm sure you believe that men deserve sexual pleasure in a relationship just as women do.
>>16977689
Oh I see. I was pointing out how unfair the "culture of sex" has been toward women. Like how many blowjobs has the average woman given compared to how many times they're eaten out. Women are expected to perform and meet their man's "needs", while their own are downplayed or never even considered. It's something that's changing, though not quickly enough.
And this obsession with chaste girls or whatever is a symptom of the overall problem. The thought that a girl is worth less if she's explored her sexuality and had a lot of pleasure is sexist and a little horrible.
>>16976182
Kekd at the butthurtedness.
>>16977717
But then, what is the point of relationships in this day and age? Why should I have a relationship with anyone if I can have the same being the friend with benefits?
>>16977816
Are relationships supposed to have some intrinsic value? And is this somehow lessened by a shift in sexual culture that places men and women on more even ground?
Here's a thought: relationships are about more than sex. Or often can be and usually are. If you don't see a difference between a friend with benefits and a significant other that's fine too. Defining things too tightly usually results in self-imposed limitation.
If you're asking what the point of a relationship is you're on the right track. Figure this stuff out for how it can benefit you and your loved ones. Tradition for tradition's sake is limiting.
>>16977847
And if he wants a traditional relationship, with a traditionally-minded girl? You'll condone that, right? Because it's fine for a girl to be traditionally-minded, right?
Do I really have to go back to church to find women that have a sense of morality to not sleep around? I can see myself going back, but believing all of those stories would be like lying to myself.
Where can I find women that have similar standards?
>>16977861
I'm fine with whatever people want to do, so long as they don't force anyone else to go along with it.
You'll find me pretty reasonable.
>>16977880
There aren't. At least, I have yet to meet one.
Because of the Left.
>>16975705
Because you only look for girls in places where sluts go. Because only sluts get intrested in you. There are a lot of girls who want an actual relationship instead of casual sex
>>16977467
Oh fuck off you pathetic virgin.
Daily reminder that virgins are not real people, just bitter homonculi
There's nothing wrong with casual sex. It's the 21st century, get used to it.
I don't have casual sex. I expect any prospective boyfriend to abstain from casual sex as well.
I don't put myself out there, no clubbing or dating sites.
>>16977607
Fucking true
>>16977892
Better dead than Red
>>16977992
ITS THE CURRENT YEAR!
>>16977997
You're the last bastion of civilization
>>16977091
Its not hard to not have sex outside of a relationship; if that's pressure to you than you're a slut
Why does it matter? Is it that hard to imagine people like having sex?
>>16978133
Something given freely has no value
>>16978142
Except humans aren't objects.
>>16978142
okay
>>16978175
Full Definition of object
1
a : something material that may be perceived by the senses <I see an object in the distance>
b : something that when viewed stirs a particular emotion (as pity) <look to the tragic loading of this bed … the object poisons sight; let it be hid — Shakespeare>
2
a : something mental or physical toward which thought, feeling, or action is directed <an object for study> <the object of my affection> <delicately carved art objects>
b : something physical that is perceived by an individual and becomes an agent for psychological identification <the mother is the primary object of the child>
Literally the definition of an object
>>16978142
I agree. But, everyone doesn't have the willpower. I personally find people attractive or "fuckable" but never act on lustful desires because I know I'd just use them as sexual objects and that's fucked up to do to someone. Even if they were okay with that I wouldn't be.
>>16977883
Just testing the specifics of your feminism.
>>16978142
That's ridiculous. Compassionate love and affection can be given freely. And there's nothing in the world more valuable :)
>>16978217
Did I pass? lol
>>16978226
Fuck you
>>16978233
Eat me, loser :P
>>16978181
>>16978181
Humans are objects in the sense that we are literally tangible, perceivable items, but not in the sense that we have some sort of market value.
What does virginity go for anyways?
Reminder that one in four teenage girls has an STD
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/23574940/ns/health-childrens_health/t/teen-girls-has-sexually-transmitted-disease/#.UPOTfGeLgfx
More partners you have the more likely your marriage is to fail
>so empower
>>16978220
Someone cannot have a real deep emotional connection after many partners.
At the end of the day stupid people will always destroy themselves, maybe all of us.
>>16978270
Says who?
>>16978279
When you're number 30, one more or less doesn't really matter. You're used to the emotional trauma of breaking up and it doesn't hurt anymore.
>>16978301
You're just making an unfounded generalization. It's definitely possible to love with an open heart even if you've been hurt a lot.
>>16978250
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginity_auction
>>16978315
I suspect (but cannot prove) that continuous casual sex (for both sexes) make one's brain indifferent to hormones (dopamine and oxytocin), just like drug habit.
>>16978332
Well that's interesting. Why would it have to be casual sex, though? If anything this seems like it would be a good idea to limit your sexual encounters overall. Even if you're monogamous and married.
>>16978037
>>16978315
In my humble and limited experience, that girls that have many partners are more likely to cheat.
Look, I'm a monogamous guy. I don't think anyone loses value after sex, nor gains it. All I ask is for you not to cheat, and to be quite honest I will have a hard time trusting someone who is promiscuous. Once again, I acknowledge my experience is limited to what I have lived.
Not the guy you're replying to, by the way.
>>16978370
So funny how people try to make fun of Oliver. He's sexy af and always on point.
>>16978377
And that's fine. You're free to look for whatever sort of girl you want. For your sake though I hope you don't let paranoia turn you off of some girls. Trust is something you can build with a partner :)
>>16978348
Let me explain with a poor quality analogy.
I suppose you're a female,so not sure if it works. Let me explain:
When I fap to a certain porn video, and after a while I want to fap again, it's easier for me to fap a new video than to the old one. This is related to a certain hormone (which I don't remember the name).
So, when you're having costant casual sex with new people, you're overloading your endocrine system. You'll need a huge amount (which you cannot provide) of released hormones to have a strong deep connection.
>>16977947
I can smell your fish roast from here, whore.
>>16978418
Yeah we'll need to perform some studies to see if there's anything to your claim. Sounds a little far-fetched and definitely not something that would result in concrete advice.
>>16978370
Pointing out that someone mentioned the current year when the argument doesn't have a lot to do with the current year is a red herring.
Pointing out that someone else has committed a logical fallacy instead of addressing the argument at hand is argumentum ad logicam.
FALLACIES FOR DAYS
Phalli too.
>>16978226
Only because you posted delicious bibimbap.
