Girls would you go on 1 date with a 50 year old married man for $200?
Asking for a friend who is considering this
>>16918626
It is prostitution but if you're okay with that, then do what you please. Morally, it is shameful.
>>16918626
go to sugardaddy sites
lots of sugarbabies there
>>16918626
Depends if she has to pay and no profit is made then no. Profit is life.
>>16918626
do you know what a prostitute is anon
>>16918630
Theres no sex, dont even gotta touch the guy. That is not prostitution, but morally shameful maybe because the guys married but definitely not because its "prostitution"
>>16918633
Of course she doesn't have to pay..the guy is.
>>16918637
Why do you consider this prostitution? Theres no sexual relations.
>>16918631
Thats how she met the guy..shes getting paid to have lunch with him. I was just curious if other people would want to do this.
If there's no sex and I'm really really poor, I'd consider it, otherwise, I wouldn't do it.
I don't care about my reputation too much, but I still wouldn't wanna be seen with an old guy in a restaurant because it's kinda low.
She can get whatever easy job and earn 200$ in no time.
>>16918641
no I mean, girls will literally let you fuck their holes any way you want for money why would you think they wouldnt go on a date for money
>>16918626
I'm not female OP, but I don't approve of either him trying to buy people's affection, or your friend who's considering it when she can just get a job.
>>16918803
>She can get whatever easy job and earn 200$ in no time.
Probably not one where she can get 200$ for eating lunch with someone..with little to no effort. I see no problem with it as long as theres no sexual relations.
>>16918814
Supply & demand. Surely he knows.
>>16918626
>Girls would you go on 1 date with a 50 year old married man for $200?
As long as it was clear that there would be no sex, in any shape or form, I'd do it. It'd be no different than going out to eat with a friend.
I just don't "get it" as far as paid companionship goes. Escorts, strippers, whatever but paying for cuddling or a simple lunch date how organic can it be? I think it'd make him feel worse or more lonely.
>>16918811
This
>>16919026
I think the appeal is that he wants to feel young again, remind himself what it was like to take babes on dates and whatnot. His wife is probably driving him nuts, and he wants to let off steam without actually cheating.
That's the only thing I can think of.
>>16919026
>I think it'd make him worse or more lonely.
Maybe. But thats what he paid for.
>How organic can it be?
If the girls good at acting/socializing.. it will feel organic to him. But if by some chance she really does like him then there you go.
>>16919023
>with a really old friend who will be staring at your ass
What if your mom's best friend is in the same restaurant? He's paying 200$, he will take her somewhere he can be seen with her by a lot of people.
It's ok for girls without dignity, though.
>>16919052
If you're ashamed of doing something like this then its not for you and you probably shouldn't be doing it in the first place..But everyones different
>>16919047
>But if by some chance she really does like him then there you go
If she really does like him then maybe she should go on a regular date and cut the whore drama?
>>16919052
>Its ok for girls without dignity
Lol..We aren't talking about prostitution. Its simply going to have lunch with someone. Has nothing to do with lacking dignity.
>>16919086
>Its simply going to have lunch with someone
For a price
>>16919052
>What if your mom's best friend is in the same restaurant?
So? As far as they know, I'm just meeting a friend from work. My mom would probably give you the same exact answer. You're pretty much getting paid to eat and talk. That's it.
>It's ok for girls without dignity, though.
I have dignity, which is why I wouldn't sleep with said person. Would you talk and eat with someone without getting paid? Yes, because you have co-workers, friends and acquaintances, right? Why does adding money to the equation make it dirty?
>>16919079
You dont have to pay for a second date with them. If she likes him she'll go on a second date and he wont pay her for it.
>>16919090
>Why does adding money to the equation make it dirty?
If you can't see it for yourself I doubt I'll be able to explain it to you.
>>16919097
>If you can't see it for yourself I doubt I'll be able to explain it to you.
It wouldn't hurt to try. Or is it that you can't?
>>16919052
>>16919097
So do talk show hosts have no dignity? They do the same thing, only it's televised.
>>16919099
Sex isn't bad at all. Why does adding money to the equation make it dirty?
>>16918641
It is prostitution. She is selling herself for money.
What is he paying for? Her. Don't have to like it, but it's true. Being an actress is prostitution too, generally. They are being paid to be seen, or to be seen with.
>>16919106
>So do talk show hosts have no dignity?
Lol, as in Jenny Jones or Cristina? LOL
>>16919107
I don't think it does, and I don't judge the people that do it. I think a regulated sex industry would do the world a service, as it would greatly cripple the sex slave trade. It's just not for me, personally.
>>16919114
I meant more along the lines of Regis and Kelly, The View, etc. Pretty much anyone on TV that gets paid to talk or eat.
>>16919117
Well, going into paid dates isn't for me either. Then again, you're someone who actually cheers for prostitution which is why I doubted I would be able to explain why I find it dirty
>>16919120
But they aren't being paid for company. That's more or less what an escort gets paid for.
>>16919086
>>16919090
I wouldn't talk and eat alone with a guy 20 years older than me that is staring at my ass, money or not. Even if he isn't staring, the problem is that he would be old.
I don't make friends or acquaintances with that sorts of people, and I certainly don't hang out with them, because I don't think it's normal.
>>16919126
>Well, going into paid dates isn't for me either.
But I'm not judging you for your choices or saying that you should or shouldn't do something. I'm asking you to explain to me why it's bad.
>Then again, you're someone who actually cheers for prostitution which is why I doubted I would be able to explain why I find it dirty
Because you can't. All you have to say is, "I don't like it!" And that's fine, but give reasons why.
>>16919138
It's bad because you're selling your company, you're selling yourself. That means that anyone who made the right offer would get you to do whatever they wanted. How can you not understand that you'd be selling yourself?
>>16919132
They're paid to interview people, bring on celebrities, and talk to a camera. They might as well be televised escorts.
>I don't make friends or acquaintances with that sorts of people, and I certainly don't hang out with them, because I don't think it's normal.
That's fine. I have friends of varying ages, backgrounds and gender, but they're all respectable people. We buy each other dinner because we're friends and we like to talk about similar interests. If you think you can't share interests with someone just because they're old, then I'm sorry for you.
>>16919156
You're quoting someone else.
>>16919147
>How can you not understand that you'd be selling yourself?
Now tell me what's wrong with selling myself. As long as I'm happy with the hypothetical situation, I'm able to give my consent, and no one is hurt, then what is the issue? I have to sell myself to my job every single day by making high quality cake. I sell my set of skills to a company, and they distribute it to customers. Everyone has to do this on some level.
>>16919158
Not intentionally, but I don't see how that matters. I'm not surprised that others hold the same view.
>>16919161
You have no dignity, which is what brought up the argument. Nothing wrong with having no dignity.
Lol hell no
>>16919167
I do. We just hold different viewpoints, so I can understand how you would think differently.
>>16919165
It matters because I'm arguing against selling yourself as opposed to being friends with different types of people, I have no issues with that.
>>16919176
How does someone having a similar view matter? I don't even know what the quote is, who said it, or how it somehow makes my viewpoint less relevant.
>>16919137
Thats YOU.. what you think is normal & weird isn't the same for everyone else. Not everyone is uncomfortable with being around older men, and they aren't weird for thinking differently than you.
>>16919147
>That means that anyone who made the right offer would get you to do whatever they wanted.
Not even close. I would never have sexual relations with someone for money. There is a huge difference between fucking someone and having lunch with them in a public place. If you think they're the same thing because theres money involved you're a very close minded person.
>>16919182
You should have replied to someone else, not me because I don't have a problem with being friends with all tyoes of people, that's all i'm saying damn it. Learn to use 4chan.
>>16919185
Having sex isn't bad. Why does adding money to te equation make it bad? Whatever your answer us, will be the same for being paid to eat lunch with someone.
>>16919195
No, you should have replied to someone else. I was accused of quoting someone, as if that somehow takes anything away from my statement, and I'm addressing it. You don't seem to understand what you're doing.
>>16919201
You are an idiot. Let me refer you to your post, moron:
>>16919156
GREENTEXT IS FOR QUOTING AND I DID NOT DAY THAT. How can you be so stupid and even say that I don't know what I'm talking about? What a retard.
>>16919185
That's me, and most of normal people and people with dignity.
What would you talk about with your old friend guy? The weather? Or he's gonna talk about how he's tired from work, some silence here and there, and you'll talk about this new song you and your friend danced to, knowing that he'll fap to the thought later.
Cmon, it's not uncommon to sell yourself for money, especially if you're poor and desperate, but even if you aren't selling your body, don't pretend that you aren't selling your dignity.
>>16919207
Right, I was quoting >>16919137. The top half was for >>16919132. Anyone with half a brain could see that, even if I left it out. You're still not addressing how quoting someone else is relevant. It doesn't matter, anon. Calm your tits.
>>16919201
Dude seriously, lurk moar. You're making an ass of yourself.
>>16919223
Let her be, she doesn't seem to understand.
>>16919228
No, I do. I addressed it here >>16919218. Anyone that cares, and is actually paying attention to the thread, will realize that I left out one post, which was three above the one I had made. It's really not hard to figure out, and I don't understand why people are sperging out over it instead of paying attention to the topic at hand. It's still not relevant to the conversation because we're all anonymous here.
200 for the date. If he wanted sex it would be a lot more.
Don't say that you're married. Keep it to yourself.
>>16918626
if I were single and there was no sex, sure. I'd rent myself out as a meal companion for people.
