>>16622339
I see no risk involved in getting too drunk at new year's eve.

>>16622339
Of course it's better to risk getting "not drunk enough".

>>16622339

depends what the risk is. so much that you die? wouldn't risk it. so much that you cant remember anything? why not. its new years. do what you want.

>>16622342
I might lose my wallet again and ruin my friend's night. I've ruined a lot of her nights, virtually every time we get drunk together.

>>16622347
I've kind of learnt how to not black out by now (or at least black out on smaller moments) so I think I could handle it.

I'm still not sure whether to take a big bottle of wine or a small bottle of vodka.

>>16622379
>>16622339
As someone who has ruined many night, I find it a serious amount more fun to only get slightly drunk, and then assist others getting totally wankered.
Just remember drunk people are drunk people and you'll be fine

>>16622403
There's only going to be me and my friend (and briefly, her boyfriend) and I don't know how much she's drinking. I've never witnessed her get more drunk than me.

If you need to hit a certain level, keep in mind that it's easier to act drunk than sober

>>16622442
The thing is, a bottle of wine is 8 euros, and a bottle of vorka is 15.

A bottle of wine can get me almost-drunk, and a vodka bottle can get me really drunk twice.

Better to be too drunk

Death before sobriety