Girls, pretend I'm somebody who has never talked to you but my face looks attractive and I'm a bit thin (a bit out of shape) what kind of personality traits would make you like me? How much does it matter that I don't have much muscle?
>>16507778
Do you like pizza? I like ham and pineapple
>>16507778
Funny, nice, approachable, charming, interesting, relaxed, ect.
Honesty, genuine niceness (not that fake nice guy bullshit), not a horrible pervert, goal-oriented.
>>16507778
Doesn't matter as long as you don't listen to gay music like Justin bieber or some shit we'll chill, and eat ham and pineapple pizza
>>16507778
Holy Jesus fucks.
Women are very diverse in the characteristics they want men to have. Here is a couple things almost all women like: confidence and comfort with who they are.
This thread implies you lack both of those.
bump for more details
I study economics, and you are posting idiotic neocon/libertarian memes on 4chan, so right out of the gate, you're could be doing better.
>>16507905
Me too, it seems like you're clueless about anything to do with the subject or politics for that matter. Being against socialism does not equate to being a neocon or libertarian.
>>16507943
Socialism is the best economy we could hope for. Raise all taxes.
>>16507987
I hope you're joking. We can see the wonderful results of socialism from Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Sweden is also a great example.
But I'm not here to talk about that shit - answer my questions.
>>16507943
Reducing Sanders' politics to "we want free shit", even in jest, is absurd and exactly the sort of thing a sheltered college-aged libertarian would say to win points at parties.
>>16507997
Next time, don't post a provocative image if you want advice.
>>16507997
murrican "political" "education", ladies and gentlemen
>>16508017
Wow, what a bunch of worthless unsubstantiated ad hominem
>supporting bernie sanders, even in jest, is absurd and exactly the sort of thing a sheltered college-aged liberal would say to win points with the black student union on campus to reduce his privilege points
See anyone can pull this shit. In the end, you're as backwards as OP
>>16508073
Except you took his argument, which successfully pointed out the logical fallacy in yours, and then changed the context to create a second logical fallacy, which is hilarious but makes you wrong, twice
not a cunt, gives out, is fun to be around, doesn't talk about boring shit, like her friends or drama shit.
>>16508089
He didn't point out anything in that persons argument, only accused him of something irrelevant.
Can you really not see that?
>>16508106
>im not like the other girls!
>>16508089
Nobody is saying anything worthwhile or of value at all, just going back and forth with buzzwords like "socialist" and "neo-con" and acting haughty and superior by using demeaning language
>neo-cons everyone
>implying stalin wasnt socialist
Back and forth forever. That was the point of flipping the ad hominem, to show that both sides are backwards ass-faggots who just spout shit and buzzwords at each other
Ya fuck
>>16508112
He pointed out that it's retarded to simplify a complex issue like the image does by making a comparison. The reply replaced that with "supporting Bernie sanders" which is the same retarded simplification as the original image
>>16507997
>Sweden is also a great example.
Sweden is one of the better places in the world.
>>16508112
He didn't accuse him of something irrelevant - he accused him of vastly oversimplifying an a political issue in order to make a caricature of it's proponents. And it's true, the image vastly oversimplifies the issue to turn a complex political problem into "hurr stoopid kids want free stuff". It's a typical political comic "I'm the author and I'm level headed, you're my opponent and you're outrageous, silly and childish" instead of actually addressing the points
>>16508133
>Reducing Sanders' politics to "we want free shit", even in jest, is absurd
This is worthwhile. You ignore it because it brings up a logical point in opposition to the comic and the main arguments of the thread - something you would have to refute but choose not to in favor of saying "everyone is just being silly desu~"
>>16507997
What's wrong with Sweden?
Next time don't post a bullshit image if you want serious responses.
>>16507997
m-muh freedumb!
wasn't this an advice thread at one point
>>16508133
>>implying stalin wasnt socialist
stalin was a communist, do you even understand the difference? do you even know that politics isn't rigid at all? there are at LEAST 3 (three) types of socialists...
again, >>16508040
>>16508281
If you want advice don't post stupid neocon shit
