This is a serious question. Is a non offending pedophile, ( still a pedophile ) that gross or weird to people? I mean what If the guy looks average, and is in his late teens?
Yes. My advice is for him to keep it to himself.
>>16455906
>does me looking average make me any better as pedophile
just keep it to yourself, and dont engage. most pedos are able to maintain adult relationships as well, but if not just dont go for it. its not worth it.
>>16455910
To never to anyone? Not even his best friend ?
>>16455917
I can have normal relationships, I recently had a GF.
>>16455918
Correct.
Youre honestly fucked , not many ppl look at pedos in a normal way man , i mean every1 has kids or nephews or something , fuck having a pedo around them. But yeah keep it to yourself , and dont go into the ghettos....
>>16455937
Well I have a 6 yr old sister who lives with me . I take care of her, and I swear Ive NEVER done anything to her.
>>16455929
If you found out your best friend was a pedophile , would you just never be able to look at him the same ?
>>16455937
The normal way to look at pedos is as scum of the earth.
One thing I've always wondered is with paedos are you is it like only an attraction or is it like an urge to rape?
yes, every pedo is disgusting
>>16455962
Basically nobody ever would. Even the thought of it alone is pretty vile and inhuman to the average member of society.
As a 29 year old weirdo I'm more grossed out that you're a teen than pedo. I'd rather hang out with a pedophile than a teen any day.
>>16456923
You're average person thinks being a pedo means you want to rape children but that isn't necessarily true. Just because you're attracted to beatiful women does that mean you're fighting an urge to rape them. It's the same for a pedo.
>>16456963
I have an urge to have sex with veautiful women and do a lot to make that happen as regularly as I can.
It's not rape. Problem is a child can't consent. If you have the urge to shag a child then you have the urge to rape one
>>16456931
This
>>16455906
>>16455906
People will hate pedos no matter how they loom or how old they are
>>16457950
seconding
>>16455906
Firstly- what would make said person a pedo? Then, we can thoroughly evaluate him.
Most men find underage girls attractive. You shouldn't worry about being a ''pedo''.
The problem is when people act on it or consider themselves pedos. When you say that you're a pedo it implies that you only find kids attractive, when in reality you are most likely not all that different from the average man.
Anyone who says they aren't attracted to pic related is most definitely a liar. Just don't sweat about it. Don't break the law.
>>16458323
>liking 10 year olds with bad teeth
pedo pls
>>16458328
No one cares what tripfags think. Go back to /lgbt/
>>16458331
>no one cares
>reply anyway
Pedos will never be accepted because they will rape literally any kid for sadistic pleasure
>>16458323
In regards to the picture, I think that little girl will grow up to be a very beautiful woman. It is an aesthetically pleasing photo. Am I attracted to the little girl? No. Would I want to kiss her and touch her if I could get away with it? No.
This is the difference between pedos and normal people.
It's a huge taboo and I would keep it to myself, never tell anyone anon. Most people don't differentiate between pedo and child molester, which is very unfortunate imo. because it keeps pedos who wants help from seeking it.
If we lived in a world where pedophilia was accepted as another fetish, we would likely know much more about it and be better at recognizing and preventing molestation of children.
A pedophile
> person who has a sexual attraction to small kids.
Child molester/rapist
> Person who acts on those attractions.
This is sadly one of those situation where the initial emotional response will never be replaced with a logical one.
People will see you as the most depraved enemy of humanity there is - whenever you need to point out the ultimate evil, it'll be "pedophiles", because "think of the children".
In the end, society is shooting itself in the foot with that, because the isolation breeds desperation and eventual *actual* molestation, instead of being supportive and offering therapy and supervision.
But hey, we need reasons to censor and control the internet, because "pedophiles"!
>>16458323
No anon. It is a cute looking child, but I'm attracted to adults with curves, hair on their pussies and a mind compatible with my own. It does not matter if the child looks beautiful or is dressed as an adult, the simple fact that it is a child is a huge fucking turn-off.
It is not pedo to be attracted to well developed teenagers though. That is something American age of consent laws have made up.
I feel sorry for you anon. It's not your fault. You didn't choose to be a pedo. But you can't tell anyone irl as things are now.
If my best friend told me he was a pedo, I wouldn't want him around my young siblings anymore, even if I knew he wasn't going to touch them inappropriately, just knowing that he might have sexual thoughts about them would be enough. Honestly I would probably be so weirded out over it that we wouldn't be friends anymore.
>>16458389
>But you can't tell anyone irl as things are now.
So, you waiting for 2020 when being pedophile is what being gay is now? :3
OP, if you were my friend of a long time and I considered you otherwise normal and responsible (read: trustworthy enough to have a ton of self control), I would be okay with it. But my situation is a little different.
My grandfather was a child molester and touched some of my cousins. We'll never be sure the extent of what else he may have done, because he's dead. When I was a teenager, I thought that maybe I was attracted to kids too, because it might be genetic, but as I grew up I realized I was just attracted to developed teens and adults. I mean, I'm still an ephebeobile, or whatever the term is, but I'd never act on it either.
Still, most people will not be accepting, and will immediately spread the news like wildfire. Keep it to yourself. Maybe see a therapist.
>>16458404
I know you're taking the piss, but yes to some extent. We should try to understand non-offender pedos instead of demonizing them.
Pedophilia, unlike homosexuality, is something that can not be practiced without the absence of consent being present. So imo, a pedo who abstains from touching children is a morally sound person who is suffering due to their sexual preference. They should be helped, not shunned.
>>16458345
I don't know that she'll be very beautiful. She has a huge forehead and wide face and wide-set eyes offset by the hairstyle and angles. Also needs braces.
Otherwise I agree. Imagining doing anything is repulsive even if I could get away with it and even if she thought she wanted to.
Try a fantasy thought experiment. If it were just her and me left in the world I'd still have to wait until she developed. If waiting wasn't an option because the world would sooner end, "now or never" then I would be willing to do only what she initiated. The key being for her pleasure and not mine. It would be awkward beyond belief. I'm not gay but might pleasure a gay guy in such a situation as well. But I would prefer my last moments not to be so primitive.
A lot of hot women only look so good because of makeup though. Girls are naturally cute. A lot of girls I grew up with got uglier after middle school when I thought they'd only get hotter. With makeup they can still be good looking. That's probably mainly our cultural ideals of maintaining a youthful appearance for women. But then other girls who were totally average looking if not ugly just became smoking hot as they got older.
>>16458376
It is not pedo to be attracted to well developed teenagers though. That is something American age of consent laws have made up.
Purely sexually, sure. But I would be hard pressed to date someone so young even if it were socially acceptable. They may be well developed, but not fully developed. A gf is also a status symbol. What could a well developed 13-17 year old offer besides awkward sex? Maybe in a world where that's the norm, just getting a girl that age would be a catch, but in that world the girls would have to be more mature than typical Americans to be gf material. Perhaps our modern system does hold back maturity compared to the level of psychological maturity a person is capable of at those ages. And for marriage, you'd know they're more likely a virgin.
>>16455906
>that gross or weird to people?
yes you pervert
get professional counseling
get castrated
or just kill yourself
>>16458409
>Maybe see a therapist
Do NOT see a therapist. Regardless of what they tell you about confidentiality, if you tell them you're attracted to kids, police WILL be contacted and you'll be treated like a criminal.
>>16455906
there was a time when it was accepted. in ancient rome. but the way USA is headed just give it a decade or two and your deviant fetish will be another protected class. because the 14th ammendment let's us make shit up now instead of passing laws.
>>16455906
Feminists have made it a no go, just like many other harmless shit in the world. Never tell anyone ever, especially not a woman.
>>16457912
Consent is a social construct. Never forget that. Tomorrow the government could lower the aoc to three and suddenly kids can consent. Pick a better argument
>>16458492
What are you talking about you pervert? It's indisputably 100% rape under all circumstances until the second that the clock strikes midnight on their birthday, then they're good for anything.
>>16458485
No it was accepted up until a few decades ago. Almost everyone has a grandfather or great grandfather who married a child. You are likely descended from a child bride
>>16458485
Was it in Rome ? Greece too ? I am think they liked teenage boys , what about girls ? I think men were the figure of beauty instead of women for some reason. And young teenage boys like twinks were popular. But not children , or teenage girls I do not know.
>>16458494
Consent is a social construct. It's a legal construct. The only place consent exists is within the law. The only reason statutory rape exists is because there is a law that says so. Laws can be changed. Appealing to authority is a bad way to look at this. Look at how it's physically dangerous to fuck kids instead of gagging on government dick
>>16458492
>consent is a social construct
Jej no what are you talking about? One can not consent if the brain areas that coordenate decision, risk and morality aren't fully developed, this is a fact. I agree that there isn't a proper age mark that says when sex with an adult is okay, but to say it is just a social/legal construct is überretarded.
Literally worst post I've ever seen anon.
>>16455906
You're a pedo.
Yes people are going to be grossed out and think you're a predator.
Best thing you can do for your own sake is to keep it to yourself and repress it as much as you possibly can.
>>16458323
>Anyone who says they aren't attracted to pic related is most definitely a liar.
Wow, you're twisted and you don't even know it.
>>16458546
You can't point to an age that makes consent possible. You destroyed your own argument. There are people over eighteen who are not developmentally adults yet they can still consent.
You're so caught up in smelling your own farts that you refuse to entertain anything that disagrees with you
>>16458323
No one has any reasons to lie here. A person who isn't a pedophile is immediately disgusted by the idea of wanting to touch a child in a sexual manner, that includes the girl in your picture.
A 20 year old who wants to fuck a busty 17 year old is not a pedo, but you definitely are.
>>16458573
>You can't point to an age that makes consent possible
That does not mean consent or lack of it does not exist, but that age of consent is impossible to determine if you have to consider each individual. You're saying age of consent is a social construct, which it is.
Not the anon you're replying to btw,
No one is ever going to believe a pedo is "non offending". Just sounds similar to a serial killer having urges to do something, over time the urges get so strong they are acted upon.
I think they should have their brains extensively studied so we can see what causes it...but that does not happen because those people end up in jail or dead or on some list that does nothing.
Even offending pedos get out of prison....and they should not.
>>16458323
Yeah... No. I think she's a cute little girl. She'll probably be beautiful in 10+ years. Do I want to fuck her? No. No I do not. I like boobs and curves on my women.
Yes. If you like girls without shapes in 2015 you're basically a pedophile trying to blend in to society. Girls that don't have shapes are unhealthy and malnourished. Preying on the weak also means you have confidence issues / a small dick.
>>16455906
It depends on exactly what you consider "pedo" since the age of consent is 18 in most states of America liking a teen under 18 usually qualifies into the "pedo" category.
In my opinion- if you are 18 and like a girl younger than you it should not be considered "pedo"
However as men get older the acceptability decreases. Anyone who is in their late or mid twenties and still pursues ladies under the age of 18 is sort of pedo. That's just my opinion though. It's not like someone turns 18 and bam they instantly stop liking younger ladies. Some people just realize it's weird and immoral later in life. And, although most men wouldn't admit this, that's the progression most men go through.
>>16458597
>Just sounds similar to a serial killer having urges to do something, over time the urges get so strong they are acted upon.
No. See it like this: Some people like to watch gore and torture movies, maybe they have folder of fictional noncon-gore porn, they have BDSM related fetishes, but this is all a fantasy, not once do they ever think of or consider doing this for real to another person. This is what differentiates them from being just a person with some fucked up interests to a serial killer/rapist .
In the same way I believe a pedo can also be completely harmless, it's a fantasy they can't help having. But that does not mean they are compelled to do it, because like the rape/torture fetishist, they are aware that outliving their sexual fantasies in the actual real world could harm someone, and no mentally sound person wants to harm a child.
Just keep it to yourself 'lad, you have a little sister, all the better and more the reason to keep it to yourself.
If you can still have relationships like you claim >>16455928, all the better, enjoy your lolis and then fug your adult-girlfriend. Not all of us can have it that easy.
Stop caring what others think, most don't even hold their own opinions on matters of such. I've found most people say they hate pedos, but if they know you or you talk, they really don't care as they understand you aren't what they imagine a pedo to be.
That being said, don't go out and advertise your love for cuties, just don't let what normies say get to you. If you really were a monster, or should kill yourself, etc etc, like many will say (and have ITT), then why do people not say that when they see you with your sister, and why (hopefully) does your sister like you so much and people say you're good with her?
Just stay safe, make sure you can't be imprisoned, cuddle your cuties, and don't speak too much about it under your real name, or connected to big social media that may expose your IP or report you.
Personally I work as a babysitter and I couldn't wish for a better job. Don't let it hold you back 'lad.
As a note, I really wouldn't discuss it on here either, 4chan isn't the most pedo-friendly. Try another chan or pedo forum. Just make sure you don't reveal yourself.
>>16458630
For the record, a pedo who looks at actual child pornography, not drawn or fictional stuff, is an offender and should kill themselves.
>>16458605
I don't care about bust size, just waist-hip-shoulder ratio. I especially love petite women with boyish bodies. Hnnng. Left>right every time. Guess I'm a closet gay pedo kekeke
>>16458573
The fact that it's hard to define the maturity of some adult people has no correlation with the fact that most (if not all, I'm giving the benefit of doubt), let's say, thirteen year olds aren't mature enough to have sex. Nice deviation of the argument btw.
I remember this radio interview some years back with an 18 year old boy who was attracted to small girls. He'd begun watching porn when he was 12, and hadn't thought anything of it when the girls were his own age, but had kept watching that kind of porn until he suddenly realized the girls weren't getting older while he was soon an adult. He then quit watching that sort of porn and made a forum for pedos who don't want to touch children to talk about their struggles with suicidal thoughts and supporting each other in staying away from child pornography.
But before that he had already told his therapist, who had been utterly disgusted by him and immediately told his parents.
Made me really sympathize with non-offenders and wish we knew more about it to help them.
>>16458689
An example like that, while it's a bit more extreme than what I detailed, is what I referred to here:>>16458618
So, my question now is, if that person now realized that it's unacceptable, immoral, and weird. And, has moved away from that phase, would that person still be considered "pedo"?
Let's say the person is 24 and watched jailbait for years until stoping and changing his life views.
>>16458704
Any person who is a attracted sexually to children is a pedo, but if they act on it and contribute by watching CP they're child molesters. Unfortunately, pedo and child molester is the same to many people.
But I don't think a person who watches porn with the title "BARELY 18 VIRGINS SUCK COCK" is a pedo.
>>16458737
It sucks that-- let's say I know someone who falls more or less in to the example I provided. To most people, he is considered pedo. Even though he has gone through a substantial transition.
The worst part is that said person was raped/molested on multiple occasions by a man who was much older than him. That, to me, is really fucked up because we have a person who has been sexually molested and raped, who began to reflect on what he was subjected to as a child. Then, began to think of the general immoral aspects of watching JB. Would a realization of said event not be qualifying enough to draw someone away from JB and realize that type of age bracket is completely wrong?
There's had been news report after news report of grown men coming to realize they were molested by their priest or coach as a child. It's not something people realize as they are growing up. But, when you're a grown man you begin to reflect on life and recollect memories that you haven't thought of in decades.
>>16455906
So long as you never act on those urges, you're golden.
>>16458977
One thing that always bothers me is when people say this.
You realize "those urges" aren't just sexual, right? Most don't just want to have sex, and that's because generally they're actual ones and not just fetishist control-freaks. "Those urges" are emotional too, just like most people have with their sexuality.
>>16458454
>comparing 13 year olds and 17 year olds
