im a bit curious about how anons like the cartoon porn.
personally im a neutral on this, i like character with "real body standards" but there are great on-model artists.
>what is that on her vagina?
is a leaf bush. and sorry for the body of the off-model one, i comite big mistakes with that.
I prefer they stay to the original style because that is the one I was attracted to in the first place.
I love all the random Simpsons bimbos, but Simpsons porn is so off-model that I can't enjoy it
I like it when an artist can do it on-model, but I'm just a happy with off-model as long as the character is still recognisable.
>>626693
There's a comfortable medium. You need to take artistic liberties with noodle leg shit, but it's better to understand the tone of the character instead of going full balloon tit stripper mode.
>>627063
Unless of course, the fetish you're aiming for is balloon tit stripper, i.e. bimbo.
I think a lot of people SAY they want on-model porn, but as best I can tell most really don't when pressed on the issue. I see fanart from time to time that is legitimately on-model and a lot of the time people don't really seem to care, but take a mostly on-model head, slap it on a generic "hot" body that vaguely resembles the style (and maybe size down the head a bit if the OG proportions are too cartoony) or give them a giant ass and tits and people will like it and think it is hot and say it is "on-model," but there is more to drawing on-model than just copying the head with 90% accuracy.
For example, if you don't like regular Vicky with saggy, pointy tits or regular Frankie Foster with shapeless, thin tube legs, you don't like them on-model, just like Wendy Corduroy without noodle limbs is an off-model Wendy. Period.
> when the artist tries to go off-model but removes the one key element that tied the parody to the source material
>>626693
On-model is the only way to go
Also, huntress wizard a best
I prefer stylistically off-model. So they look like the character, but not 100%, and still cartoonish instead of completely humanized.
Example, Garabage manages to capture everything that is quintessentially "Vicky" but without the limitations of Hartman's art style
>>626693
I think on model is usually great, but off model can be good in it's own way.
First example is Tinkerbell. It's by Zimmerman, and so far off model it's comical.
>>626693
The next example is Midna by Legoman. Almost the same. pretty far off model, but I like it alot.
>>626693
The next two are examples by the same artist. The first is a pretty close to original style piece that is great. Gadget by Joe Randel.
>>628525
woops forgot the pic
This is the second pic by Joe Randel, Really far off source, but it's good in it's own way.
I guess my point is that if the art is good, then it's going to be good, but once you get far enough off base, and the art is shit, it seems like a waste of time to call it that character. If that first pic by Zimmerman weren't labeled Tinkerbell I wouldn't guess it was her.
Oh and here is another pic by Joe he's lovely.
One more. Another from Joe which is kinda of half way between the two. Charlotte from Princess and the Frog. Kind of his own take, but still recognizable.
>>628521
Because Zimmerman can LITERALLY only draw a single body type.
It really depends on what the on-model style is to begin with, and how suited that is to porn.
On-model Marceline the Vampire Queen doesn't do much for me, but off-model does. But something like Wakfu or ATLA, definitely on-model is preferable.
>>631601
>wakfu
>off-model
who degenerate can ruin that cute/hot art style?
>>627063
what this anon said. OP I think you did a good job in your pic with the on-model.
>>631639
thank you anon, glad that somebody like my shitty art.
Doesn't it depend on how fapable the original model is?
>>626693
AT style is more cute than hot so you pretty much have to go off model for fapping purposes.
>>626693
On-model
>>628521
on model is better
There was a time artists would go way off-model with a character to appeal to the average person. Now, where's the non-bbw/non-large-ass Toriel?
on-model if the character is hot
off-model if it's not
I can't fucking fathom why people fap to on-model pictures of stick figures.
I like both of them, however I am not favourable towards of model Xenos and monsters. I feel it kind of misses the point.
I love it when it's fanart and its the same style as the original cartoon.
Because sincerely, when i search for porn of a cartoon, i want to see the same cartoon but naked.
I also love 3d porn, it's difficult to fail on that one and ass bouncing are the best.
>>626696
Fucking this, really good way to put it
IMO, on model porn is just too fucking good.
>>626693
Honestly it depends on the art-style.
On-model's only good if the original art style's good. But it's rather frustrating when on-model art is popular with a show that has ugly art. I'm baffled at how much on-model porn there is of Lois Griffin when she has an enormous nose and her head looks like a dickhead.
>>626693
Depends on the model frankly
Page 10 bumping
That's a great on-model drawing OP, kudos.
>>626709
I think Aeolus06 does a pretty good job.
>>648954
this
![01[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/fl7eKsq.jpg "01[1].jpg")
