Last thread
>>140629
enough with the cgi shit, post some art.
>>168313
>asking to post art
>doesn't post anything
Anyone got that Alien V Predator, choose your own ending story?
It had electro stim, and excessive fluid and load of other good stuff
>>168333
>Skinny-ass rose
At least make her fit ffs
Full body armor is for pussies
Rupert Everton is da gawd
>>168333
Is this the controversial drawing that lead Tumblr to Cyber Bully the artist telling he/she to kill themselves?
>>169130
No actually, its a part of the backlash from that.
Tumblr artists drew a bunch of skinny roses and racial/body swaps to piss off the ones who were triggered
>>169345
Ah. Well shit that's even better.
Be mad.
>be me
>be together with a derby girl
>she often has a black eye or a bruise somewhere.
>get looks from strangers who think i beat her.
i never asked for this.
>>169880
sounds worth it
>>168499
Totally. Popeye arms are where it's at!
Kinda thin for a supposed barbarian, but I like her clothes.
Are futuristic warriors ok?
>>170734
Definitely
>>170734
Of course!
Amuricah, all about tits and battleaxes.
>>168512
>Thread asks for warriors
>Clearly posts a thief
shiggidydigs
>>168891
How is this an adult illustration?
>>168922
>boob armor
God damn it.
>>171518
Unfortunate as it is, there's a damn fair number of artists and people who don't understand how armor works.
>>171534
>>171541
>>171550
These are supposed to be warriros?
>>171562
This is not a warrior woman. It's a wizard dog.
>>171586
Anon, that is a dog. Anon, don't put your dick in that.
>>171593
>Not giving your good girl a reward
>>171604
Ok, pretty sure Warriors can't cast Create Healthstone. Now you're just spamming without looking.
>Warrior women thread
>Mostly casters
>>171740
And some dogs.
>>171213
OF COURSH!
>FTFY
>>170724
Would love to see a movie with female 300. This would be world peace
>>172232
There's this toony webcomic called Cerintha that takes place in ancient rule63 Rome, but with magic. It might be up your alley.
>>171759
>implying they are not war dogs
>>171740
>western porn art board
>posting mostly /tg/ character art material
Some things just don't make sense in this life
most of these pics just look like skinny chicks holding a sword
very disappointing.
>>171525
What if the cleavage area has extra armour? Would it work a bit better then? Add a gorget to protect the throat and head from slipped thrusts?
>>173202
I think that would just make it heavier and more expensive than a much lighter and cheaper breast plate without actual breasts could be. It'd dig into the cost-weight ratio big time.
Mind you I'm not one of those people who go sperg mode when there's a boobplate since things like the muscle cuirass show there was some limited use of anatomically correct armor.
>>173296
Got the weiner version?
>>173168
Her arms are disproportionate to her body. It's off putting.
>>173296
Affirmative. I have a few Amazons and such, but a lot of them have dicks. I've been holding back on posting them here because I don't want to flood the thread with futa even though I'm a raging futa fan.
>>173674
Whoops, >>174276 was meant for you.
>>173296
>>173202
There's also the issue of the shape of the armor.
A boobplate armor will give a chance of deflecting blows upwards, and towards the face and neck due to the curvature of the breast.
Besides, unless the entire chestpiece is a single piece of metal, which isn't advisable since it doesn't allow for growth or change in breast size, then it just adds another seam or weak point in the armor which could be exploited or has a higher chance of snapping off, rendering the armor largely ineffectual.
>>174276
Im interested in them, also thanks for the pic!
>>174634
All very true. There's little reason to have defined breasts for physical warriors unless for ceremonial purposes. Even an anatomically correct muscle cuirass offers better protection from being mostly flat with outward facing slopes.
It still irks me somewhat though how much hate boob-apparel gets even when the person wearing it is expressly not a front line soldier or physical warrior or in instances where the universe and technology feature armor that doesn't rely on simple physicality.
That fantasy rogue and the cyberpunk spy can wear form fitting clothes if they want. You're not the boss of them!
But this is a warrior thread, so that's off-topic.
>>174634
Here. She's totally a futa.
>>170734
>>174897
that's a very big...
hammer
>no korra
>>175180
Very wide...
and girthy.
Barbarian elf.
>>177358
Cyberpunk mode
>>177361
Nekked
>>169624
>Be mad.
It's Chaos, heresy is expected.
>>171507
>How is this an adult illustration?
Leather fetish?
>>177598
I drew it so...
>>177358
Most lewd.
Ridiculous sword too.
>>177600
It's just that the nose from the front made it look more beastly.
>>177573
this one is really cool. I feel like I could spend 10 or 15 minutes just looking at all the details.
.
>>177720
>>177721
>>177722
>>177724
>>169880
>derby girl
So, you're a lesbian?
>>171218
She's pretty hot, reminds me of Sharla from Xenoblade.
>>168217
Why do people not give them muscle fuck
>>183145
Female poser models have two settings, slender female and disgusting muscled giant
>>183728
Nope everything in between.This elf is not necessarily a warrior, but she DOES show that that is not a true statement about poser figures.
(Just a test render I did playing with lights and shadows.)
Hope this is cool i enjoy them def warr quality
good ol' Red
>>184507
Personally I don't care, but this is Eastern so you might end up getting in trouble.
>>171525
>a damn fair number of artists and people who don't understand how armor works.
And you posted high-heels with that statement. Hypocrisy much?
>>171724
That's hot
>>171547
That's the first time I saw art of shamans from Heroes V.
It's rare as hell
>>188686
Get a grip.
>>171525
But wouldn't standard armor hurt a womans chest? I had this discussion before with this chick and she said it would most likely hurt the chest if a chick wore standard armor.
i'm posting some brown if nobody minds..
>>189353
>>189362
brown is best
>>189348
Actually most standard armor plate armor had a shitload of padding behind it to help absorb blows, there isn't much point in having a sheet of metal against your chest to stop incoming attacks if all the enemy has to do to hurt you is slam something heavy into you.
Hell that's one of the main reasons maces were so effective, they didn't have to rely on piercing the skin to cause damage, they could just cause large amounts of blunt trauma to a general area.
The padding also helped slow down arrows or crossbow bolts that got through the outer shell, since it absorbed a large amount of the force of the arrow, though they were still rather effective in killing armored targets.
Hell the most basic type of armor most people in the middle ages used was called a Gambeson, which was just layer upon layer of wool or other tough cloth, and was often used as padding underneath chain or plate armor.
Not to say it wasn't very comfortable to wear, imagine fighting for more than an hour at a time wearing thick layers of wool, then pile some chain and maybe even plate on top of that if you want to feel extra safe.
>>189528
That makes sense, i guess it would depend on the padding as well since women breast are more sensitive than a mans?
[spoiler]Sorry if i seem real stupid to me the boob armor thing always made sense but you have put it in perspective.[/spoiler]
>>171513
>death prophet
>warrior
if you say sooooo anon
>>190165
>Responding to a post from a week ago
Do you actively try to shitpost or does it come naturally to you?
>>183728
But why
>>191208
Why what? I have already said it is bullshit. More proof
