is she proof you can have female protagonists without ruining the story?
Exception to the rule
>>142862833
Not really. Jojo exists in a weird situation where it's impossible to ruin the story because the more retarded it gets, the better it is. And it gets very, VERY retarded during Stone Ocean.
As far as I could tell /a/ is generally of the opinion that female protags > male ones though? Fuck I can't keep up with you guys anymore
>>142862833
Twelve Kingdoms and Rose of Versailles are
>>142862833
Part 5-6 is the low point of JoJo.
>>142864024
Bu the japs love part 5 so there's a chance we just hate it because of the shitty translations.
>part 6 wasn't bad
>part 6 had Heavy Weather
>>142863656
It's almost as if /a/ is browsed by more than one person, and people can have
>different opinions
>>142864218
On the other hand the japs also like SAO and GSD
>>142862833
except she literally ruined everything. not to mention, her character was a carbon copy of jotaro which is not a good thing. the only amusing part of part 6 was pucci.
>>142862833
She's more of a man than Josuke
>>142864024
Low point was 1 through 3 faggot
>>142866221
Pucci was shit.
>>142864218
>good taste
>be a nip
choose one
>>142866369
way better than part 3 dio/kira who everyone worships
