Assassination Classroom is the best anime that I can remember seeing. There is not a single thing about it that I dislike. Who else agrees?
>>141966562
I only read its manga
its alright yo
>>141966562
I dropped it after 3 episodes.
I liked watching S1 and will probably watch S2 when it finishes but what bugs me about the show is how 1/2 - 3/4 of the cast are literally a waste of space
>>141968382
>I dropped it after 3 episodes.
JUST
>>141968382
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NRrgSFyK-Q
One of the best animes ive ever seen!!!
>>141968020
Nagisa should have gonefull edgelord when Kayano died and become an assassin.
Typical shounen anime filled with "life lessons" often given in speech form after some sort of revelation or some character beating a weakness.
Nobody has negative traits, if they do, rest assured an episode will come along to make sure that the negative trait is shown to be a positive or to stamp out that negative trait with an aforementioned life lesson. A plethora of "just passing through" characters typical for shounen anime. Most of the "bad guys" are just "misunderstood" or have have other feel good excuses for being "bad" and never have conflicting world ideals which would make for an actual interesting "bad guy".
The character design is bland. The animation is ok, it isn't bad but nothing stands out as particularly good either. The voice acting is bland.
Also the premise is as dumb as they come, even for anime&mongo standards. If you praise this but hate Naruto you are applying double standards, i.e. if you enjoy this there is no reason to not enjoy Naruto.
The only good thing about this anime was the idea that Nagisa might be a girl, but they thoroughly ruined that with that swimming episode.
>>141966562
Is this bait? Not even the biggest AssClass fans consider the anime to be that good. It's got some good episodes, but yeh it's very bland. The manga is of course better but even that's an 8/10 at best.
>>141966562
OP is the biggest faggot that I can remember seeing. There is not a single thing about him that I don't dislike. Who else agrees?
>>141971732
>Most of the "bad guys" are just "misunderstood"
Takaoka
Shiro
>Nagisa might be a girl
>wanting Nagisa to be a generic girl
Why?
>>141971839
If anything OP is a anti-AssClass fag
I'd give the manga a rare 9/10, but calling the anime the best is just plain bait.
>>141973300
I wouldn't even be surprised since majority of /a/ didn't even know the series existed until the anime
Now that they know it existed and is popular they must shit on every aspect of this seriesMatsui's next thing fucking when
>>141966562
I'd class Nagisa's ass, if you know what I mean.
>>141973663
classy
>>141966562
I dropped it at the end of chapter 1 when sensei preached that being a murderer is all about friendship.
Ass Class is the most average anime ever. Its not great, its not bad, I watch it and enjoy it and thats okay. I won't go out my way to watch every episode but in saying that I think I will get some feels when it ends.
>>141973709
You should watch the next two episodes then decide man
>>141966562
Even if we take away the ridiculous "want to be so cool with the edgiest theme we can find" shit, the main character is still a homo sexual's wet dream little boy, making the whole series shit.
>>141973782
The chairman backstory was great.
>>141966562
dubs
>>141973818
It's not anything you said though
>>141973846
Say how it isn't, or shut up, fagboy.
>>141966562
I can't blame you on that. Considering the amount of cancer shit anime that is running every season, in comparison to the like 1-2 actual good ones. It's absolutely incredible how much shit exists.
>>141966562
I dropped the manga at some point. It's boring trash.
>>141973881
t. One Punch Man reader
>>141973863
First of all, explain to me how is it edgy, or are you just pulling words out of your ass now? The main character is a "homosexual's wet dream little boy" only appearance-wise, and it is thoroughly explained in his backstory. But why should you care? I don't expect a mouthbreather like you to do.
>>141973818
>le everything I don't liek is edgy xD
Consider killing yourself
>>141973818
>"want to be so cool with the edgiest theme we can find"
This series is extremely light-hearted with the given premise, to the point where it makes some people sick.
>>141973901
>how is it edgy
Assassination classroom. Assassination. That is probably the edgiest theme I can think of for an anime with school age characters.
>main character is a homosexual's wet dream" only appearance-wise
That's far more than enough though. A girly faggot little boy ruins the series for everyone but underage fags or fujo, I am pretty sure about that.
>>141973818
Hello, ESL-kun.
>>141973955
Have you read the manga? Or are we just drawing conclusions basing of names now? It's a light-hearted series with little dark elements in it. If a main character's appearance affects your taste towards a series then I'd really hate to be you.
>>141973955
>That is probably the edgiest theme I can think of for an anime with school age characters.
http://bato.to/comic/_/comics/fukushuu-kyoushitsu-r13992
>>141974010
>Have you read the manga?
No, god no. 5 episodes were more than enough.
>Or are we just drawing conclusions basing of names now?
I told you that the theme is edgy. How is the theme not edgy, however light hearted they are about it?
>If a main character's appearance affects your taste towards a series then I'd really hate to be you
Anime is a visual medium, of course it matters to me whether they're trying to appeal to my taste, or pander to homos/fujos instead.
I knew that fanboys are the worst kind of people, especially when it comes to something this casual, but damn is it still cringe worthy.
>>141974053
>5 episodes were more than enough
So you think your opinion amounts to anything? Kek
>How is the theme not edgy, however light hearted they are about it?
Look up the word "charm", you'll surely appreciate it a lot. The series takes a theme that is supposed to be edgy light-heartedly, which in turn produces a story that piques the interest of readers. It's a bit tough for you to understand but try to keep up. Repeating umbrella terms only make your arguments incoherent don't you agree?
>or pander to homos/fujos instead.
t. projecting
I knew that haters are the worst kind of people, especially when it comes to something this casual, but damn is it still cringe worthy.
>>141974053
How is kids trying to kill their octopus teacher with bb guns and rubber knives edgy?
Goofy, yeah.
Controversial, sure.
But edgy?
>>141966562
Fucking OP got what he wanted in this thread. Are you happy now shitlord?
>>141974145
So you don't even have argument, just ad hominem attacks.
That's what I thought, thanks for playing.
>>141974179
>personal insults = ad hominem!
>I win by default haha
I wasn't refuting the argument on the basis that you are a retard, I am refuting your argument based on statements I have provided while simultaneously calling you a retard. Your biggest mistake was thinking that summoning the angels of ad hominem will give you a decisive edge in an argument, when it is apparent you are the one with no arguments. You've been dying to use that classy Latin word haven't you? If >>141973992 is right, please educate yourself before you make a fool out of yourself.
>>141974179
>sorry engrish not my first langauge xD
Look at these child-bearing hips. You'd smash that and you know it.
>>141974331
>>141974278
>>141974246
I'm extremely sorry I won my argument so hard you don't even have anything to counter with.
I'm sorry, but blame OP for asking someone to do so.
>>141974361
>>141974179
Still waiting for a reply to my stuff
If not I'm probably going to assume you're replying to yourself
And everyone thinks OP is retarded, even fans of the series
>>141974331
Calling out fallacies incorrectly is also a fallacy. Calling him fallacy man is saying that he's using fallacies incorrectly, and being fallacy man yourself.
>>141974361
Haha you definitely won that one by offering no valuable riposte to anything I said. I was wrong because I used a personal insult and that apparently makes me commit the ad hominem fallacy and undermines all of my arguments! You're winner! On side note OP is a faggot
>>141966562
Japan has a shitty school system and culture the manga the anime the experience.
>>141974329
I love how Nagisa makes people nervous and angry when he's not even the most popular character in the series
>h-he should've been a girl
Hahaha,Just like his mom.
>>141974429
How is it fallacy fallacy when he was the one using fallacies incorrectly?
>>141971732
>my opinions are facts
>if you enjoy this there is no reason to not enjoy Naruto.
What?
Naruto is a show about retard ninjas, who wear ORANGE while they try to be Gokus and Vegetas.
You complain about how every character improve itsself, but this what this show is about.
A teacher should teach more than "2+2=4", teachers shold teach about life too and every character desenvolved a bit, everyone grew up.
And it is a fun anime to watch just that, we are not reading a book here.
>>141968382
same here
>discussing action shounen anime is somehow acceptable these days
>>141974361
>everyone that doesn't agree with me is samefagging
Disgusting
>>141971732
I liked this but Naruto is shit.
>>141974361
Whatever makes you sleep at night
>>141974554
Blame DBZ being allowed.
You know what kind of people it attracts to talk about.
Yes, people who enjoy teen boy orientated shows like AssClass.
>>141974554
Try saying this in the eternal One Piece general or Naruto threads and see what happens
>action
Bit more of dramedy
>>141974466
Probably explains why it resonates more with them.
>>141974535
Ya, naruto is retarded because ninjas wear orange, but this is totally fine despite it having a yellow octo who destroyed the moon, promises to destroy earth and teaches a class that is tasked with killing him, all while the jap government hangs back and does nothing because mach20 = invincible.
This show is equally retarded, honestly the only reason it is better is because it isn't an eternal show crammed with fillers.
>>141974613
I do all the time.
>>141974638
That's what people don't seem to understand
People will shit on me for this but I like that the series actually uses the school setting rather than it just being a backdrop to relate to the audience
>>141974670
>all while the jap government hangs back and does nothing because mach20 = invincible
Sup
>>141974670he didn't destroyed the moon
Both shows are totally diferent, one is a batle shonen (a bad batle shonen) while the other is a uhm, comedy/slice of life with some insane things only japs could make.
I swear I can't think of a better homo OTP in any anime. They were made to be together.
>>141974246
>>141974361
>won hard
>>141973888
Nothing happens the manga. Literally every situation ever is solved through some bullshit solution and has no impact on the overall plot besides some development for the student central to said situation. Student that is going to spend the rest of the manga doing almost nothing.
I dropped it when Kaede or whatever is her name got defeated by a kiss. Of all the bullshit solutions, this one takes the cake. Not like "le god of death xD" being a completely underwhelming villain just before that helped anything.
68 posts
28 IP's
This is just a handful of younglings defending their precious favourite shounen anime.
>>141974872
YOU"RE WRONG WEEB!
>>141974872
Because every poster in this thread must be different individuals, noted.
>>141974856
Daily reminder that the people who complain about the plot of AssClass also praise One Punch Man at the same time.
>>141974872
Not my favourite, sorry. It's a chill enjoyable SoL to read.
>>141974872
>this is my first time in a thread about this series
Newfag?
Or can you not defend your shit opinions?
>>141974872
>analyzing a 4chan threand
Your life would really sucks.
>>141974856
Shounen anime is childish shit designed to appeal to japanese junior high kids, more news at nine.
>>141974893
>>141974899
>>141974902
>>141974906
>proving me right; the posts.
>>141974900
Oh right, so typing that was a waste of my time. Should have known. Let me speak your language then:
Daily reminder that I never praised OPM.
Nothing happens the manga. Literally every situation ever is solved through some bullshit solution and has no impact on the overall plot besides some development for the hero central to said situation. Hero that is going to spend the rest of the manga doing almost nothing.
I dropped it when Tatsumaki or whatever is her name got defeated by a kiss. Of all the bullshit solutions, this one takes the cake. Not like "le Boro xd" being a completely underwhelming villain just before that helped anything.
>>141974943
>I have no argument the post
Whether people replied to your post or not you were gonna twist shit around anyway. So why bother?
>>141974943
>Newfag?
>Or can you not defend your shit opinions?
Oh wait you're one of those tards who mass quote
>>141974982
I was never arguing. Enjoy your shounen
>>141975005
Hey, don't blame me when my post gets replied to 5 times all in the space of <40 seconds.
>>141974979
Read the post right before yours you retard.
Still, I'm going to be pretty proud if this becomes a pasta.
>>141974943
>still analyzing a 4chan thread and the posters
Yep, your life sucks.
It's pretty good. Not my favourite but a lot of fun.
Nagisa and Karma are the best non-homo homos of the season, and they were when the last season came out as well.
>>141975088
All the numbers are right there on your screen buddy. Hows your summer holiday?
>>141975121
t. Summerfag
>>141975049
So how does the amount of posters matter to the thread or arguments, assuming we're not circlejerkimg harder than a Madoka thread?
People replied to that because we've known the series is unpopular on /a/ since S1 of the anime, and the manga ended months ago.
why are you guys taking the bait?, you should know better
>>141975175
Because baiting is the only way to get /a/ to talk about this series, and I'm only half-joking when I say that.
Watch how dead the thread is when we have an episode airing.
>>141975137
Your assumption is wrong.
>>141975209
>/a/ hates shounen anime, more news at 10
>>141975250
>Your assumption is wrong.
What?
>>/a/ hates shounen anime, more news at 10
If you look at the catalog there's a thread for each of the Big 3
And /a/ loves Ashita no Joe
>>141975366
>Ashita no Joe
>shounen
No, stop
As for the big 3 threads, everyone except the people who post in those threads would like to see them, and everything in them go up in flames. Though I guess /a/ would rather have all the shounen shit contained in 3 cancer generals than it spilling over into every single fucking thread like it used to.
>>141975544
>ran on Weekly Shonen Magazine
>not shonen
Kill yourself, my man.
>>141975632
Why did you add that coma?
>>141975544
>you
>not being retarded
No, stop
Seriously stop being one of those tards who think Shonen = Battle Shonen only
>>141975664
Why not, anon?
>>141975675
>>141975366
Are you two seriously putting ashita no joe in the same box as naruto and assclowns because of a shounen tag? Ashita no Joe ran over 40 years ago, shounen manga then isn't comparable to shounen manga now.
>>141975544
>than it spilling over into every single fucking thread like it used to
Little too late for that with >>141971732 and his high quality posts
>>141975750
Move those goalposts fast! Maybe no one will notice.
>>141975750
The amount of years ago that it ran doesn't matter, dumbass.
Shonen is Shonen.
I guess Dragon Ball is gonna suddenly becomes Seinen in a few years, right?
HnK too?
What a shitty argument, fucking bait harder.
This thread is ass.
>>141975781
He is right, though the post is TL;DR and should have just said "assclowns is a shitty naruto tier shounen anime".
>>141975852
He's talking about the giving the naruto treatment to ashita no joe threads just because it's shonen. That's what I think he's saying.
>>141975852
>Putting ashita no joe in the box of naruto and assclowns wasn't enough
>He puts DBZ in with assclowns and naruto too
oy vey, the absolute madman, why do you hate anime?
>>141975880
No, I am saying that what animation studios made for boys 40 years ago isn't the same as what animation studios make for boys these days. Shounen 40 years ago was fine, shounen nowadays is shit. Ashita no joe is great, naruto and assclowns is shit
>>141975880
Then he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about he should've said "Shonen I like vs Shonen I hate" so I could dismiss him faster.
He also really wants this "assclowns" thing to catch on.
>>141975901
>oy vey
>the absolute madman
So where does the memespeak end and the actual argument begin, /v/?
>>141971839
If anything, it's better than the sea of filth we've had this past and current season.
>>141975982
So your saying it's Toei fault?
>>141975982
Yeah what happened to MANIME, right guys?!
>>141975997
Argument? We aren't arguing anon kun. I am just here making sure everyone is well aware that this anime is no better than naruto or any other modern shounen show. You are helping me in this with your pathetic attempt to put it in the same box as ashita no joe based on a "they are both shounen!" which is really just grasping at straws.
>>141976037
No, I am saying assclowns is a shitty anime.
>>141976099
Nobody's comparing it to AnJ.
They're saying that AnJ is still a Shonen, regardless of whatever you say.
This is probably asking too much from the "special" community but can you actually read?
>>141976099
What a bizarre form of shitposting. Nobody actually cares about AssClass anymore. It ended months ago and no one watches the anime. You're better off "trolling" the Nanatsu no Taizai thread.
>>141976179
>can you actually read
Not a requirement, being over 18 is though.
>>141976226
>Nobody actually cares about AssClass
You think I am shitposting. I think you and everyone defending this show, claiming it to be good, is shitposting.
>>141976226
That's what I'm thinking, why not bait a series with more potential fish instead of one that majority of /a/ already seems to hate since a year ago?
I guess someone shitposted against him with an image from this show or something
>>141976288
Guess you really can't read. I specifically stated in my post that no one on /a/ even watches the anime. No one is defending it.
>>141974856
THIS
Plot Convenience, the show.
Plus: the story should be about students who try to kill the teacher and consequently learn life lessons from it. But strangely they never do this. Practically there are no assassination attempts from the kids.
>>141974900
And stop using OPM as an excuse. I don't even like the series, but is part of the comical premise everything be easy to Saitama. In AC, on the other hand, everything be easy makes no sense, since the story is about students learning things.
The villains are so shit. They are always presented as if they were the most evil thing in the universe and, a second later, are overthrown. Nagisa wins Takaoka only with his "muh bloodlust" eyes.
>>141976288
>You think I am shitposting. I think you and everyone defending this show, claiming it to be good, is shitposting.
What the fuck did I just read?
>>141976288
>Not a requirement
>not knowing how to read is not a requirement to browse image boards or form an argument
>being over 18 is though
Yet you can't manage to fit either one
>>141976349
Life as ESL person is suffering.
>>141976372
You meet requirements, you don't fit them. So much for those English skills.
>>141976384
It's ok, just take the time to learn, it ain't that hard.
>>141976384
Do you think it was the Brazil part that pissed them off?
I like to think so
>>141976384
>every opinion that I don't like is a shitpost
If a guy have this mindset while browsing this site he would lose his marbles really quickly.
>>141976346
>Nagisa wins Takaoka only with his "muh bloodlust" eyes
>I'm going to magically ignore physical training and the fucking stun gun
>>141976346
At least be subtle when samefagging. The show is shit and so are you.
>>141976346
t. Never read the Manga or just too stupid for basic comprehension
>>141976504
He always says "but Takaoka but Ketchup"
Followed by muh sues
I wish the shitposting we got was at least comedic
>>141976546
>was at least comedic
When you look at his appalling English you might smile.
>>141976412
>>141976412
>>141976610
Oh the irony. How's summer?
>>141976610
Is that your phone's auto correct you are posting?
The idiom is "to meet a requirement" not "to fit a requirement", but go ahead and scour the internet to find that one obscure site that tells you "to fit requirements" is correct.
>>141976793
>>141976793
If you want to be pedantic you must at least be proficient.
Much like Neuro, interesting characters and concepts but absolutely mediocre execution that wastes all its potential. I guess this is what happens when you write for kids. Matsui should just leave WSJ to not be held back.
It's not horrible, I'm sticking with it until the end. I still like the characters and most episodes aren't offensively bad. But it's nothing special and it feels like it tries not to be anything special.
>>141976954
>just leave WSJ
While I feel like he should write a Seinen manga one day I think this series was limited because of the way it was set up
I still like both series a lot though, and am eager for his next thing (hopefully with a lot of weird and surreal shit)
>>141976877
You do realize it bases that of searches right? So all you have proven is that "fit a requi-" is most often completed as "fit a requirement".
Also, after typing in "fit a requi-" ho many ways do you think google can finish that sentence? There are 3-4 words in the English language that start with "requi-", of course it is going to autocomplete it as "requirement".
Can you at least try to prove me wrong, this shit is embarrassing. Is this how you spellcheck your homework? By typing it into google and seeing how it autocompletes it?please be American
>>141977127
>>141977193
You have increased the possible words by 2(two) or so. Stop using google autocomplete that uses information keyed in by idiots like you.
>>141977127
The Oxford Collocations Dictionary says the following:
VERB+requirement: comply with, fit, fulfill, match, meet, satisfy, suit. The Macmillan Collocations Dictionary gives three more verbs, "achieve", "adhere to", "conform to".
Educate yourself peasant, accepting defeat isn't that hard even with your inflated ego.
>>141977334
What are you babbling about? No honestly, I have no idea what you are posting this for. Why do you think we are talking about the definition of the word requirement? Nobody has even mentioned it up until this point.
I am going to go ahead and assume you are not the same guy and are a 3rd party butting in. I might be disagreeing with the other guy, but at least he isn't being a turbo retard like your special self.
>>141966562
i died inside everytime they said "our bloodlust"
>>141977326
No, this discussion right now is the necessary chemo
>>141977413
That cognitive dissonace is really hitting hard on you huh? Kek. Your pseudo-intellectualism is absolutely repulsive. Can't you read? >VERB+requirement: comply with, fit, fulfill, match, meet, satisfy, suit
All of these words can be used in front of requirement you mouth-breather. But I've got to say, you're functioning pretty well for an autist.
>>141977413
>Why do you think we are talking about the definition of the word requirement?
No, that's just you. He didn't post the definition of the word "requirement", ESL-kun. Read it again.
>>141977413
>definition of the word requirement
Either you are the stupidest man alive or the best baiter of them all.
>>141977476
>>141977463
Well then I stand corrected.
>>141977334
I have it here on my desk, and word for word it is the same as what you just said, accept for "fit". How convenient.
What are you faggots even discussing about now?
>>141977565
except*
>>141977565
>I have it here on my desk, and word for word it is the same as what you just said, accept for "fit". How convenient.
Kek. Show it to me, ESL-fag.
>>141977492
>>141977413
This isn't me, you don't honestly think I am going to back down after going down the rabbit hole this far.
>>141977577
Engrish
You gonna tell me this is any worse than Naruto comparisons or "but it's not-Shonen"?
Because the thread was shit since the OP
>>141977601
>>141976453
This is the perfect example of what is plot convenience. You are using relativity to justify a resolution. So just because I trained I'll automatically win without problems. He tricked the guy twice consecutively in less than six months. Even in crap like Naruto, there is some sense of difficulty.
>>141976546
Oh, it's Matsui's wife again. I miss you.
>>141977601
>>141978044
Btw, this isn't me being "unwilling to admit defeat" as you put it. If you have a more recent copy of the dictionary which contains the option "fit" that is fine by me and I will "admit defeat".
However, so far it has been my copy of Oxford's collocation dictionary vs some guy using google autocomplete, excuse me for believing my Oxford dictionary over google's incompetent autocomplete.
>>141978044
https://www.google.com/#q=%22fit%20the%20requirements%22&tbm=bks&lr=lang_en&gws_rd=ssl
>>141978200
>So just because I trained I'll automatically win without problems
You pretending like the series turned Nagisa into Jesus when he just turned a knife fight into a stun gun to the throat.
And it's an exaggerated version of an real life technique.
>Even in crap like Naruto, there is some sense of difficulty
You mean have nobody else be relevant again and have the MC and rival turn into to Jesus?
And let the guy who sparked all this shit live free and unharmed?
Lots of blood gushing does not equal effort.
>He tricked the guy twice consecutively in less than six months
Have you never been pranked before?
>>141978290
Literally all books with foreign non native authors. Like I said in my last post, Oxford collocation dictionary trumps all. I admittedly do not have the latest version, so I am sincerely and patiently waiting for someone with a more recent copy to show me the "fit" addition.
>>141976954
>Much like Neuro, interesting characters and concepts but absolutely mediocre execution that wastes all its potential.
why do you think the execution is mediocre?
>I guess this is what happens when you write for kids. Matsui should just leave WSJ to not be held back.
what the target audience has to do with it? the author knows to whom he is writing from the beginning. many people said that the death note failures were because of the limitations of the wsj. now the authors are in a different magazine and writing only got worse.
>>141978405
Are you shitting on Neuro now, ESL?
The series that admitted that you never finished?
>>141978388
Go to the next few pages. I'm pretty sure that David P. DeVenney, Daniel B. Wallace and Jack Vance are native authors.
>>141978471
But then again, that wouldn't be enough to disprove you. You would probably just call them wrong.
>>141978471
If it isn't in an acclaimed University's collocation dictionary, it is wrong. When it comes to (collocation) dictionaries Oxford trumps all.
Continuing to patiently wait for someone to post a more recent copy than mine.
>>141978530
Do you blame me? This entire thread I am getting ad hominems and bullshit flung my way. Then some guy mentions the de facto authoritative oxford collocation dictionary stating that "fit" is included, but doesn't actually add proof. Then I post my copy showing it isn't included and all of a sudden the guy is nowhere to be found and the goalposts have moved away from the oxford collocation dictionary to google fucking books instead.
Most recent Oxford collocation dictionary > all.
>>141978605
That is a bold statement. Not being in the dictionary doesn't necessary make it wrong, but yeah. Please wait.
>>141978708
Wipe those tears away, ESL-kun. The bad men are gone now.
>>141978378
>Lots of blood gushing does not equal effort.
Neither overcome skilled enemies without hardship and make them fall into silly tricks several times. You are forgetting that they are children learning things.
>Have you never been pranked before?
Twice? For a kid who mocked me the first time? A kid who until recently did not know anything about killing techniques? The same kid for whom I planned a revenge?
>>141978708
>ad hominem
Please see >>141974246
>>141978761
Like I said, don't care about "admitting defeat" as the other shitposter so childishly put it, but so far nobody has shown the mental capacity to be able to do that.
It is honestly reaching a point where I want someone to come along and prove me wrong so I can close the thread in the knowledge that I wasn't trolled into nearly believing "fit requirements" is correct but that it actually IS correct.
>>141978791
>twice
>Multiple times
Is Takaoka your husbando? I'm really starting to wonder.
>For a kid who mocked me the first time?
Except he never did, he kindly asked to leave after hitting his classmates, losing the bet that he set up himself.
It's Takaoka's own fault for fucking up.
>>141978819
>>141978781
>samefagging
>>141978964
>everyone I don't agree with is samefagging
Getting real tired of your shit
>>141966562
aside from the faggot boy who looks/acts like a girl
>>141978465
what the fuck are you talking about? why the execution is mediocre after all?
>>141978781
Oh hey, you back? Planning on posting that elusive copy of your OCD anytime soon? Or did you really just fantasize that "fit" into your post?
>>141978992
As is everyone with your obvious samefagging.
When will moot finally ban all the ESLs from posting? It'd cut down the shitposting and newfags by about 60%, I'd wager.
>>141978995
Can somebody tell me what makes Nagisa act like a girl?
I can understand looks but I can never understand acts.
>>141979056
Never because then Dragon Ball threads would be dead.>moot
>>141979010
You have to realize that there are multiple people here mocking you, ESL-kun.
>>141979051
Whatever deludes you ok
>>141979056
But the shitposters are Australians according to moot.
>>141979056
Considering he isn't around anymore and didn't ban samefaggers either when he still was, I'd wager never.
>>141979130
Nah, just 1 guy being wrong and shitposting with an evidently non existent OCD copy.
>>141978920
Don't tell me you really expect all collocations to be there, do you? If you think a collocation isn't found in the dictionary implies that it doesn't exist then that's pretty myopic, even though that other anon could just be shitting.
>>141978925
>Is Takaoka your husbando?
Is Matsui your waifu? But if you want I can use other examples like GoF and Team Houjou. You choose.
>Except he never did, he kindly asked to leave after hitting his classmates, losing the bet that he set up himself.
Takaoka was fooled twice in the most ridiculous way possible (bloodlust eyes and smile + be my guinea pig). That's the point . It's like Nagisa had control of everything.
>It's Takaoka's own fault for fucking up.
Plot convenience: the villain is stupid for the sake of the good guy.
>Assclass anime is the best ever
fucking lmaoing at your real life right now
>>141979195
Sure, ESL-kun. This particular thread has just been people shitting on you but let's just pretend it's one person. That should really help you calm down.
>>141979225
>it's in the OCD
>hah you are wrong
>it isn't in the OCD
>b-but that doesn't m-mean anything!
Nah.
I actually want soomeone to post it. Someone post that mysterious "fit" addition to the "requirement" entry in the OCD. I want to be wrong.
>>141979398
You think that is me? kek, try again.
>>141979401
https://prowritingaid.com/en/Collocation/Dictionary?word=requirement
Will this satisfy you? Even if he was contradicting himself it wouldn't change the fact that if a collocation isn't found in the dictionary implies that it doesn't exist.
>>141979444
Curses, foiled again by your masterful grasp of the English language.
>>141979269
>calm eyes to knife
>bloodlust eyes to drop knife, break concentration, and stun gun
Yeah dude, completely the same.
>I can use other examples like GoF and Team Houjou
So you can move the goalpost and spout the same shit again?
>the villain is stupid for the sake of the good guy
>smart people can't fuck up
For a guy who hates Mary Sues you sure want your husbando to be one
>>141979394
Nobody took him seriously.
>>141979444
Your comprehension skills are abysmal.
How does Nagisa's hair work?
>>141979490
But nobody is shitting on me in the picture you added to your post
>>141979521
They're short pigtails behind his head
>>141979555
Yeah, I'm not really sure what you're saying here. Did you mistake what that image was supposed to convey? The filename and reply chain may help you in deciphering its actual intended purpose.
>>141979665
Come on now, you wouldn't want him to hurt his head do you
>>141979665
The only post in that picture made by me is the
>You have increased the possible words by 2(two) or so
Which received exactly 1 reply. I would hardly call that "being shat on by multiple people" or whatever your exact wording may have been.
>>141979744
A swing and a miss. That wasn't the point of the picture. Two more tries. This time, pay attention to the (you)s
Oh, and are you claiming you're not >>141977413?
>>141979931
Who would want to admit being a retard?
>>141979974
He does have a trip now.
>>141979974
This guy >>141978200 does with every post
In every thread
And he never quits
>>141979931
>a swing and a miss
Nah.
This post >>141977413 is indeed not me.
I realize you are posting the picture to prove you aren't samefagging. I am merely saying that I am not getting shat on by multiple people because that simply isn't me.
Or in other words, your comment;
>This particular thread has just been people shitting on you but let's just pretend it's one person.
is wrong in the sense that the post that is being shat on in that picture isn't me. You up to speed now?
Still patiently waiting for someone to post a recent entry of "requirement" in the OCD.
>>141979931
While we are at it, I'll point out again that this >>141977492 isn't me either.
I guess in a way I am getting shat on in this thread, just not in the way you meant it.
>>141980150
>I knew all along!
Oh. Good job. Full marks.
>is wrong in the sense that the post that is being shat on in that picture isn't me. You up to speed now?
But that wasn't the intended purpose of that picture. Do you understand now? It wasn't meant to show you the people shitting on you.
Assuming you're the same guy who insinuated that Ashita no Joe wasn't shonen (and why wouldn't you be? The stupid grammar class shit branched off from that), then yes, the whole thread is dedicated to shitting on you and that other guy who >>141980113
is arguing with.
>>141980150
You can deny all you want honestly, that wouldn't change anything in the slightest. You say that you are not shat on multiple people but unless the only post you've made is >>141977326 you're blatantly bullshitting. Like that other guy said, if a collocation isn't found in the dictionary doesn't implies that it doesn't exist. What is with your repugnant intransigence on your clearly flawed stance? Is it the fact that you are too hot-headed to think logically?
>>141980410
>Oh. Good job. Full marks.
>oh no, my assumptions were wrong, better ridicule.
>Assuming you're the same guy who insinuated that Ashita no Joe wasn't shonen
More wrong assumptions
Meanwhile nobody is posting that sp00ky OCD entry. You do realize I want you, or anyone else for that matter, to prove me wrong?
>>141980574
Requirements can be better or worse than others.
EG. I must have a drink.
I can have a preference for certain kinds of drinks.
Think about it like a GRE problem, anon. There are questions that can have 5 correct answers but only one is more correct than the others.
Happy? Not every collocation has to be in that compact bible of yours to be right.
>>141980574
I've been ridiculing you the whole time, though Taking three posts to say you knew all along and still focusing on your perceived notion on what that picture was supposed to prove only makes you look more dubious
>More wrong assumptions
Feel free to quote your first post then. I trust your honesty, ESL-kun.
>>141980430
A lot of words, but you aren't saying a whole lot. The OED and by extension the OCD is the de facto authority on the English language, and while it receives criticism for exactly that, it doesn't change the fact in the slightest.
If "fit requirements" is correct, I promise you it will be in the more recent version of the OCD (which I do not own). All you have to do is post it, some anon in this thread claimed to have it, but he has yet to post an image proving it.
>>141980686
Well while we are busy lets just accept nigger speak as well since it gets used a lot. Lets just forget about my "compact bible" because that is convenient now.
>>141980843
Change what the fact in the slightest? You are reluctant to admit that your logic is flawed and while I do admire your perseverance you are nevertheless purblind towards open thinking and resort towards a book which you admitted yourself is quite flawed. Answer my question. If a collocation isn't found in the dictionary does it mean it would be wrong to collocate the aforementioned words? You are grasping at a ridiculously thin straw here while so far the only rebuttal you have is that the collocation does not exist in the dictionary and subsequently provide no more arguments.
>>141980810
Buddy, it wasn't me who worded your post, you were the one talking about "all the people shitting on you". All I did was point out that was wrong.
You samefagging or not is really a moot point to me, no way to prove it so I just took your word for it.
I never even accused you of it anyway, the only thing I said was that you were the only person mocking me, which to my knowledge is still correct. Others might have been throwing bullshit arguments my way, but the only one continuously trying to mr funny with me is you.
As to my first post that would be:
>>141976412
>>141981118
I am mocking you too, too subtle for you to take a glimpse perhaps. Speaking of bullshit arguments, you were the one vehement in spouting them, am I not mistaken?
It's alright, Last episode felt a bit too rushed.
The Kaede reveal was so fucking good, I'd have never have guessed even though it made sense, Such a good part probably the best between both seasons.
I don't mind watching it but it's not amazing.
>>141981102
Would I know what a person meant when they said it? Yes
Would I be a pedantic zealout about it IRL? No.
Will I be a pedantic zealout about it when anons try to bullshit me with google autocomplete and a, as of yet, elusive copy of the OCD? Look at this thread for the answer to that.
Personally I would be very reluctant to use it if it was not mentioned in the OCD, there isn't a single instance in which you couldn't replace "fit" with, for example, "meet".
>>141981217
I am not keeping tabs on who is posting what. It feels like I am talking to 4 or so people, but who knows, like I said, no way to prove any of it anyway so who cares.
>>141981274
Even after all those bullshit evidence the others provided that hold no veracity, you refused to acknowledge the further arguments that have been quite coherent. You personal whims are highly irrelevant to the credence of the collocation itself, which I believe an alleged pedantic zealot like you should know. Even if the verb "fit" before requirement is interchangeable most of the time, it does not dent its validity in the slightest.
>>141981118
>you were the one talking about "all the people shitting on you". All I did was point out that was wrong.
Yeah, by insisting that the picture I posted was to show you the people clowning you even after being told it wasn't.
>I never even accused you of it anyway, the only thing I said was that you were the only person mocking me, which to my knowledge is still correct.
No, you said
>>141979010 and >>141979195
which leads back to the purpose of that picture.
>you were the only person mocking me, which to my knowledge is still correct.
That's where you're blatantly wrong. Just read the latter half of the thread.
>As to my first post that would be:
>>141976412
I must say, you really do clean up nicely. I trust you fully, ESL-kun. I won't pursue this any further.
>>141981586
It does when "meet" is included in the OCD and "fit" is not. It isn't as if we are talking about an obscure colloquialism from some Welsh village. If "fit" is as widely used as is being implied in this thread, it will be included in the OCD, this isn't an amateur student project we are talking about.
I keep repeating this, but it really is quite simple. Just point me towards the edition of the OCD that includes "fit".
>>141981627
>That's where you're blatantly wrong. Just read the latter half of the thread.
Well fair enough then. That being said, I am still waiting for that anon who claimed to have found "fit" in a copy of the OCD.
>he is just lurking enjoying the shitfest he caused
I would be lying if I said that it wouldn't "upset" me a tad if that is the case
>>141981697
How does frequency of a collocation affect its validity I may ask? No one here said that "fit" is widely used, the Google Books results only suggests that the collocation has been used by several authors, which is why it wasn't included in the dictionary in the first place. Then again, the collocation "match requirement" isn't in your dictionary as well. Would you call that wrong too? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, is that too hard to understand?
>>141981268
>The Kaede reveal was so fucking good.
The revelation was great, but the execution from it was disappointing. The author seems to care only with shock value and forget the rest.
>>141982053
>only with shock value and forget the rest
It set up the flashback and future event and made the series a little more somber
But that's just like
Your opinion, man
>>141981914
No, but it would be peculiar for the OCD to not add it to say the least, and until they do there is no reason to accept it as strictly speaking correct. Languages evolve, shit gets changed all the time, but like I said OED and OCD are final.
Golliwogs&co here speak English in the most butchered forms. Do I understand them and do they understand each other? Yes, sure, that doesn't make it correct though, not until the guys at the top decide to say it is correct and add it.which I honestly hope is never, the day they start blanket adding wogspeak is the day I am packing up and leaving for a different island
>>141982157
Yes, I understand your point, but this makes it seem like everything served only as a plot device. The resolution of Kaede's drama was too fast. I expected a little more substance, a little more participation of her classmates. The scene was perfect for that.
>>141982205
The problem with all of this is that your points mainly constitute of argumentum ad ignorantiam. Does the dictionary denounce the usage of the collocation? Well this might be negative proof as well, you fail to realize that the OCD is merely a book that systematizes commonly accepted combinations of words rather than a de facto authoritative, which I pardon for dismissing that statement earlier. As stated on the cover of the book itself, it is for students of English, so it was meant to be a reference book. Having that said, your nignog example is not relevant in this case, as it is highly implausible to call "fit requirement" a butchered form of English, where it may be an obscure collocation at worst.How long are you gonna be here anyway, that person ain't coming back I assure you
>>141982503
Yeah it should've just been an orgy in the ring of fire, right?
Maybe next time
>>141979584
So, there are more than two?
>>141982506
We are reaching a point where it is just going to turn into a "muh burden of proof" issue.
Is it on me to prove words not in the OCD are strictly speaking incorrect?
or
Is it in you to prove words not in the OCD are not strictly speaking incorrect?
Either way I will have to admit that it has become more a matter of principle, to see this entry, than anything else.
I close tabs once a week, so I'll be here until the thread dies (and later).
>>141982854
No?
>this fucking thread
>>141982948
The burden of proof is on both sides but I have provided my argument in this post >>141980686
No, it would be one-dimensional of me to state the burden of proof solely lies on your back. Put all of the de facto authoritative aside, I'm all ears for what proof you will bring to the table.
I won't be active from here onwards as I have a job and I doubt this thread will last the night but it's been a fairly interesting discussion to say the least.
>>141983105
This thread is great right now
We're just going through chemotherapy
>>141983105
/a/ at its finest
>>141983234
>chemotherapy
implying that ever cured cancer
>>141983316
Never said it did
But we need it anyway
>>141983105
Came in for the boipussi, stayed for the autism
>>141968382
this
>>141982552
Well, certainly it would be more fun than "here, take a kiss and your problem is completely solved". That's just safe writing, really.
>>141983614
Kaede's issue was the fact that she wanted to know why her sister died and why Koro-sensei is the way he is
The kiss was basically a "calm the fuck down and listen"
Why does nobody understand this
>>141983614
The kiss was great, though. Nagisa should've had more shit like that instead of constantly relying on the fucking clap.
>>141983185
Well without it authoritative nature the OED/OCD loses all meaning. This has always been one of it biggest criticisms. It being a language Nazi dictating what goes and what doesn't.
Without these books giving us the "rules" we can all agree on, it would boil down to if you can make yourself understood or not. This is already largely the case with textspeak, streetspeak, wogspeak etc., none of it is "official" but it all finds major use anyway.
There is a fine line to be drawn though, if you go with an "anything goes policy" there is no agreed upon language to communicate with each other with, oevr time you'd need to bring along a translator for each separate county you entered. On the other hand Oxford at the moment is arguably too conservative, not moving with its time of the digital/internet era. The people at the top running the show at Oxford are to set in their ways and unwilling to accept unconventional/modern language into the officially recognized "correct" language.
How and where you would want to balance "new language vs old language" is a question that goes over my head though.
TL;DR
Without Oxford's authoritative nature "fit requirement" would be as correct as people understand it.
>>141983867
I don't know why people hate the kiss now
https://foolz.fireden.net/a/thread/122729751
